Evidence for Mixed Rationalities in Preference Formation

Understanding the mechanisms underlying the formation of cultural traits is an open challenge. This is intimately connected to cultural dynamics, which has been the focus of a variety of quantitative models. Recent studies have emphasized the importance of connecting those models to empirically acce...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexandru-Ionuț Băbeanu, Diego Garlaschelli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-01-01
Series:Complexity
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3615476
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849307163797749760
author Alexandru-Ionuț Băbeanu
Diego Garlaschelli
author_facet Alexandru-Ionuț Băbeanu
Diego Garlaschelli
author_sort Alexandru-Ionuț Băbeanu
collection DOAJ
description Understanding the mechanisms underlying the formation of cultural traits is an open challenge. This is intimately connected to cultural dynamics, which has been the focus of a variety of quantitative models. Recent studies have emphasized the importance of connecting those models to empirically accessible snapshots of cultural dynamics. In particular, it has been suggested that empirical cultural states, which differ systematically from randomized counterparts, exhibit properties that are universally present. Hence, a question about the mechanism responsible for the observed patterns naturally arises. This study proposes a stochastic structural model for generating cultural states that retain those robust empirical properties. One ingredient of the model assumes that every individual’s set of traits is partly dictated by one of several universal “rationalities,” informally postulated by several social science theories. The second, new ingredient assumes that, apart from a dominant rationality, each individual also has a certain exposure to the other rationalities. It is shown that both ingredients are required for reproducing the empirical regularities. This suggests that the effects of cultural dynamics in the real world can be described as an interplay of multiple, mixing rationalities, providing indirect evidence for the class of social science theories postulating such a mixing.
format Article
id doaj-art-265e3eca0a264e2db1a39c58d7b7978a
institution Kabale University
issn 1076-2787
1099-0526
language English
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Complexity
spelling doaj-art-265e3eca0a264e2db1a39c58d7b7978a2025-08-20T03:54:51ZengWileyComplexity1076-27871099-05262018-01-01201810.1155/2018/36154763615476Evidence for Mixed Rationalities in Preference FormationAlexandru-Ionuț Băbeanu0Diego Garlaschelli1Lorentz Institute for Theoretical Physics, Leiden University, Leiden, NetherlandsLorentz Institute for Theoretical Physics, Leiden University, Leiden, NetherlandsUnderstanding the mechanisms underlying the formation of cultural traits is an open challenge. This is intimately connected to cultural dynamics, which has been the focus of a variety of quantitative models. Recent studies have emphasized the importance of connecting those models to empirically accessible snapshots of cultural dynamics. In particular, it has been suggested that empirical cultural states, which differ systematically from randomized counterparts, exhibit properties that are universally present. Hence, a question about the mechanism responsible for the observed patterns naturally arises. This study proposes a stochastic structural model for generating cultural states that retain those robust empirical properties. One ingredient of the model assumes that every individual’s set of traits is partly dictated by one of several universal “rationalities,” informally postulated by several social science theories. The second, new ingredient assumes that, apart from a dominant rationality, each individual also has a certain exposure to the other rationalities. It is shown that both ingredients are required for reproducing the empirical regularities. This suggests that the effects of cultural dynamics in the real world can be described as an interplay of multiple, mixing rationalities, providing indirect evidence for the class of social science theories postulating such a mixing.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3615476
spellingShingle Alexandru-Ionuț Băbeanu
Diego Garlaschelli
Evidence for Mixed Rationalities in Preference Formation
Complexity
title Evidence for Mixed Rationalities in Preference Formation
title_full Evidence for Mixed Rationalities in Preference Formation
title_fullStr Evidence for Mixed Rationalities in Preference Formation
title_full_unstemmed Evidence for Mixed Rationalities in Preference Formation
title_short Evidence for Mixed Rationalities in Preference Formation
title_sort evidence for mixed rationalities in preference formation
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3615476
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandruionutbabeanu evidenceformixedrationalitiesinpreferenceformation
AT diegogarlaschelli evidenceformixedrationalitiesinpreferenceformation