Current Non-Invasive Imaging Techniques Used in the Diagnosis of Adenomyosis

Objective: This review aims to provide insights into the current non-invasive imaging methods used in the diagnosis of adenomyosis, as well as to highlight their diagnostic accuracy, advantages, disadvantages and limitations in the detection of this benign uterine condition. At the same time, this p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vlăduț Săsăran, Claudiu Mărginean, Lucian Pușcașiu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IMR Press 2023-03-01
Series:Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.imrpress.com/journal/CEOG/50/3/10.31083/j.ceog5003049
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849701798240059392
author Vlăduț Săsăran
Claudiu Mărginean
Lucian Pușcașiu
author_facet Vlăduț Săsăran
Claudiu Mărginean
Lucian Pușcașiu
author_sort Vlăduț Săsăran
collection DOAJ
description Objective: This review aims to provide insights into the current non-invasive imaging methods used in the diagnosis of adenomyosis, as well as to highlight their diagnostic accuracy, advantages, disadvantages and limitations in the detection of this benign uterine condition. At the same time, this paper emphasizes the importance of using consensus-based terminology in the imaging description of these lesions. Mechanism: A search of PUBMED database was conducted for articles published between January 1998 and August 2022 and studies which compared non-invasive imaging methods with postoperative histology examination of uterine specimens were primarily selected. Transvaginal two-dimensional ultrasound was for a long time the main non-invasive imagistic method used for assessment of adenomyosis lesions. The introduction of Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group criteria yielded a significantly better diagnostic outcome of adenomyosis in case of conventional ultrasonography, but the distinction of concomitant benign uterine conditions still remained challenging. Findings in Brief: The addition of three-dimensional ultrasound or elastosonography to conventional two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound yielded higher diagnostic sensitivity. Qualitative elastography particularly proved useful in the diagnosis of adenomyosis due to its capacity to achieve differential diagnosis of benign uterine pathologies based on lesion stiffness. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination presents higher diagnostic specificity and sensitivity, can assess the endometrial and myometrial layers in detail, but its use has been shadowed by costs and significantly longer examination time. Conclusions: The imaging terminology established by consensus by the MUSA group in recent years has facilitated the description of adenomyosis-specific lesions. Two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound in combination with three-dimensional ultrasound or combined with qualitative elastography offers similar diagnostic sensitivity and specificity to MRI. Despite some limitations, MRI remains a reliable diagnostic method for adenomyosis.
format Article
id doaj-art-2641790ddfd041b183d6b3c74567d6cc
institution DOAJ
issn 0390-6663
language English
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher IMR Press
record_format Article
series Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology
spelling doaj-art-2641790ddfd041b183d6b3c74567d6cc2025-08-20T03:17:51ZengIMR PressClinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology0390-66632023-03-015034910.31083/j.ceog5003049S0390-6663(22)01984-4Current Non-Invasive Imaging Techniques Used in the Diagnosis of AdenomyosisVlăduț Săsăran0Claudiu Mărginean1Lucian Pușcașiu2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2, Faculty of Medicine in English, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences, and Technology of Târgu Mureș, 540136 Târgu Mureș, RomaniaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2, Faculty of Medicine, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences, and Technology of Târgu Mureș, 540136 Târgu Mureș, RomaniaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1, Faculty of Medicine in English, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences, and Technology of Târgu Mureș, 540136 Târgu Mureș, RomaniaObjective: This review aims to provide insights into the current non-invasive imaging methods used in the diagnosis of adenomyosis, as well as to highlight their diagnostic accuracy, advantages, disadvantages and limitations in the detection of this benign uterine condition. At the same time, this paper emphasizes the importance of using consensus-based terminology in the imaging description of these lesions. Mechanism: A search of PUBMED database was conducted for articles published between January 1998 and August 2022 and studies which compared non-invasive imaging methods with postoperative histology examination of uterine specimens were primarily selected. Transvaginal two-dimensional ultrasound was for a long time the main non-invasive imagistic method used for assessment of adenomyosis lesions. The introduction of Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group criteria yielded a significantly better diagnostic outcome of adenomyosis in case of conventional ultrasonography, but the distinction of concomitant benign uterine conditions still remained challenging. Findings in Brief: The addition of three-dimensional ultrasound or elastosonography to conventional two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound yielded higher diagnostic sensitivity. Qualitative elastography particularly proved useful in the diagnosis of adenomyosis due to its capacity to achieve differential diagnosis of benign uterine pathologies based on lesion stiffness. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination presents higher diagnostic specificity and sensitivity, can assess the endometrial and myometrial layers in detail, but its use has been shadowed by costs and significantly longer examination time. Conclusions: The imaging terminology established by consensus by the MUSA group in recent years has facilitated the description of adenomyosis-specific lesions. Two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound in combination with three-dimensional ultrasound or combined with qualitative elastography offers similar diagnostic sensitivity and specificity to MRI. Despite some limitations, MRI remains a reliable diagnostic method for adenomyosis.https://www.imrpress.com/journal/CEOG/50/3/10.31083/j.ceog5003049adenomyosistransvaginal ultrasoundelastographymagnetic resonance imagingdiagnostic accuracy
spellingShingle Vlăduț Săsăran
Claudiu Mărginean
Lucian Pușcașiu
Current Non-Invasive Imaging Techniques Used in the Diagnosis of Adenomyosis
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology
adenomyosis
transvaginal ultrasound
elastography
magnetic resonance imaging
diagnostic accuracy
title Current Non-Invasive Imaging Techniques Used in the Diagnosis of Adenomyosis
title_full Current Non-Invasive Imaging Techniques Used in the Diagnosis of Adenomyosis
title_fullStr Current Non-Invasive Imaging Techniques Used in the Diagnosis of Adenomyosis
title_full_unstemmed Current Non-Invasive Imaging Techniques Used in the Diagnosis of Adenomyosis
title_short Current Non-Invasive Imaging Techniques Used in the Diagnosis of Adenomyosis
title_sort current non invasive imaging techniques used in the diagnosis of adenomyosis
topic adenomyosis
transvaginal ultrasound
elastography
magnetic resonance imaging
diagnostic accuracy
url https://www.imrpress.com/journal/CEOG/50/3/10.31083/j.ceog5003049
work_keys_str_mv AT vladutsasaran currentnoninvasiveimagingtechniquesusedinthediagnosisofadenomyosis
AT claudiumarginean currentnoninvasiveimagingtechniquesusedinthediagnosisofadenomyosis
AT lucianpuscasiu currentnoninvasiveimagingtechniquesusedinthediagnosisofadenomyosis