Demography, emergency interventions and outcome after severe pelvic injuries: a two-decade registry study from South- Western Norway

Abstract Background Severe pelvic injuries with ISS > 15 is associated with a high degree of morbidity and mortality. We aimed to describe the demography, emergency interventions and outcome of patients with these injuries and analyze changes in practice occurring in this timeframe. Methods Stava...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kenneth Thorsen, Pieter Oord, Jon K. Narvestad, Andreas Reite, Kjell E. Tjosevik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-06-01
Series:Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-025-01399-y
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849234980364877824
author Kenneth Thorsen
Pieter Oord
Jon K. Narvestad
Andreas Reite
Kjell E. Tjosevik
author_facet Kenneth Thorsen
Pieter Oord
Jon K. Narvestad
Andreas Reite
Kjell E. Tjosevik
author_sort Kenneth Thorsen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Severe pelvic injuries with ISS > 15 is associated with a high degree of morbidity and mortality. We aimed to describe the demography, emergency interventions and outcome of patients with these injuries and analyze changes in practice occurring in this timeframe. Methods Stavanger University Hospital (SUH) is located in South-Western Norway. All patients registered in the Stavanger University Hospital Trauma registry between 2004–2022 with a pelvic injury and concomitant ISS > 15 were included in this study. Results In total 462 patients with a pelvic injury were included in the trauma registry between 2004–2022. There were 160 patients with an ISS > 15, with 115 (72%) men and 45 (28%) women. Median age of men was 45 years, while women were slightly older at 52 years of age. The 30-day mortality in men (25/115) and women (10/45) was identical at 22%. Emergency intervention was performed in 33/160 (20.1%%) patients. In 27 patients a laparotomy, an EPP or an angioembolization was the primary hemostatic emergency procedure. All but one pelvic packing were done in the years 2010–2014, with one packing also performed in 2021. A significant decline both in number of patients receiving crystalloids and the amount of crystalloids administered, both prehospitally and in the ER were seen when comparing period 1–3. The mortality in the EPP group was very high at 6/8 (75%) while only 1/9 in the laparotomy group succumbed and 2/10 (20%) in the AE group. These discrepancies may be related to the high median ISS of 50 in the pelvic packing group, vs 40 in the angioembolization group vs 38 in the laparotomy group, reflected by a statistically significant difference in probability of survival (TRISS score) between emergency intervention groups (p < 0.001). Conclusion Severe pelvic injuries are quite rare, with about 1 incident per month. About 2/3 are men and transport related injuries are the most common mechanism of injury. Patients in need of emergency intervention are characterized by a high median ISS and concomitant high mortality. A significant decline in emergency interventions were seen over time, which may be related to declining infusions of crystalloids and better transfusion protocols.
format Article
id doaj-art-263baa80ecd6488da8dc555aa2017102
institution Kabale University
issn 1757-7241
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
spelling doaj-art-263baa80ecd6488da8dc555aa20171022025-08-20T04:02:56ZengBMCScandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine1757-72412025-06-013311910.1186/s13049-025-01399-yDemography, emergency interventions and outcome after severe pelvic injuries: a two-decade registry study from South- Western NorwayKenneth Thorsen0Pieter Oord1Jon K. Narvestad2Andreas Reite3Kjell E. Tjosevik4Section for Traumatology, Surgical Clinic, Stavanger University HospitalSection for Traumatology, Surgical Clinic, Stavanger University HospitalSection for Traumatology, Surgical Clinic, Stavanger University HospitalSection for Traumatology, Surgical Clinic, Stavanger University HospitalDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Stavanger University HospitalAbstract Background Severe pelvic injuries with ISS > 15 is associated with a high degree of morbidity and mortality. We aimed to describe the demography, emergency interventions and outcome of patients with these injuries and analyze changes in practice occurring in this timeframe. Methods Stavanger University Hospital (SUH) is located in South-Western Norway. All patients registered in the Stavanger University Hospital Trauma registry between 2004–2022 with a pelvic injury and concomitant ISS > 15 were included in this study. Results In total 462 patients with a pelvic injury were included in the trauma registry between 2004–2022. There were 160 patients with an ISS > 15, with 115 (72%) men and 45 (28%) women. Median age of men was 45 years, while women were slightly older at 52 years of age. The 30-day mortality in men (25/115) and women (10/45) was identical at 22%. Emergency intervention was performed in 33/160 (20.1%%) patients. In 27 patients a laparotomy, an EPP or an angioembolization was the primary hemostatic emergency procedure. All but one pelvic packing were done in the years 2010–2014, with one packing also performed in 2021. A significant decline both in number of patients receiving crystalloids and the amount of crystalloids administered, both prehospitally and in the ER were seen when comparing period 1–3. The mortality in the EPP group was very high at 6/8 (75%) while only 1/9 in the laparotomy group succumbed and 2/10 (20%) in the AE group. These discrepancies may be related to the high median ISS of 50 in the pelvic packing group, vs 40 in the angioembolization group vs 38 in the laparotomy group, reflected by a statistically significant difference in probability of survival (TRISS score) between emergency intervention groups (p < 0.001). Conclusion Severe pelvic injuries are quite rare, with about 1 incident per month. About 2/3 are men and transport related injuries are the most common mechanism of injury. Patients in need of emergency intervention are characterized by a high median ISS and concomitant high mortality. A significant decline in emergency interventions were seen over time, which may be related to declining infusions of crystalloids and better transfusion protocols.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-025-01399-yTraumaPelvic injuriesEmergency interventionResuscitation
spellingShingle Kenneth Thorsen
Pieter Oord
Jon K. Narvestad
Andreas Reite
Kjell E. Tjosevik
Demography, emergency interventions and outcome after severe pelvic injuries: a two-decade registry study from South- Western Norway
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Trauma
Pelvic injuries
Emergency intervention
Resuscitation
title Demography, emergency interventions and outcome after severe pelvic injuries: a two-decade registry study from South- Western Norway
title_full Demography, emergency interventions and outcome after severe pelvic injuries: a two-decade registry study from South- Western Norway
title_fullStr Demography, emergency interventions and outcome after severe pelvic injuries: a two-decade registry study from South- Western Norway
title_full_unstemmed Demography, emergency interventions and outcome after severe pelvic injuries: a two-decade registry study from South- Western Norway
title_short Demography, emergency interventions and outcome after severe pelvic injuries: a two-decade registry study from South- Western Norway
title_sort demography emergency interventions and outcome after severe pelvic injuries a two decade registry study from south western norway
topic Trauma
Pelvic injuries
Emergency intervention
Resuscitation
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-025-01399-y
work_keys_str_mv AT kenneththorsen demographyemergencyinterventionsandoutcomeafterseverepelvicinjuriesatwodecaderegistrystudyfromsouthwesternnorway
AT pieteroord demographyemergencyinterventionsandoutcomeafterseverepelvicinjuriesatwodecaderegistrystudyfromsouthwesternnorway
AT jonknarvestad demographyemergencyinterventionsandoutcomeafterseverepelvicinjuriesatwodecaderegistrystudyfromsouthwesternnorway
AT andreasreite demographyemergencyinterventionsandoutcomeafterseverepelvicinjuriesatwodecaderegistrystudyfromsouthwesternnorway
AT kjelletjosevik demographyemergencyinterventionsandoutcomeafterseverepelvicinjuriesatwodecaderegistrystudyfromsouthwesternnorway