Le capacity building ou comment construire sa place à travers la construction de compétences collectives
For several decades, individual housing has remained the privileged way of life in France and, more broadly, in Europe (Damon, 2017). Tributaries of private action, residential subdisions continue to develop to all-out, despite the political orientations aiming at "making the city on the city&q...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Université Lille 1
2021-09-01
|
| Series: | Territoire en Mouvement |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/tem/7795 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | For several decades, individual housing has remained the privileged way of life in France and, more broadly, in Europe (Damon, 2017). Tributaries of private action, residential subdisions continue to develop to all-out, despite the political orientations aiming at "making the city on the city" (ALUR, 2014). The vivacity of the debate illustrates the cleavages and convergences, but also the advantages and disadvantages of these urbanized spaces being set up.This evolution of the points of view poses residential subdivisions as a space in full mutation, which imposes to do with the inhabitants in place, which leads to two types of questions:• A first on what exists: what place do the inhabitants already there occupy? What are the forces in place?• A second questioning the logic of renewal, so both the vision (what it can be done) and the place of stakeholders in the process: how to involve the inhabitants in place? What place for future inhabitants?This article reports on research studies exploring capacity building processes. These experimentations test action levers to trigger project logic. The article begins with a theoretical framework on capacity building and explains the conceptual tools used to create negotiation spaces and build collective capacities. Then, a comparative analysis of two study cases will highlight the diversity of periurban spaces, while revealing the common challenges they face. Finally, the action research processes will be analyzed and will show how the inhabitants take their place in the transformation processes in course. More specifically, they question the possible points of convergence between "individual project" and "collective project", relying on the creation of new negotiation spaces and cooperation. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1950-5698 |