The (s)elective Mountain

Are there social inequalities regarding access to the ‘nearby mountain’ - that is, mountain for day hikes or hikes lasting a few days with overnight stays in tents or refuges? Are they so strong that the hikers who meet on mountain paths and in and around mountain refuges share homogenous social pro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pierre Mercklé, Delphine Moraldo, Caroline Datchary, Benoît Tudoux
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Institut de Géographie Alpine 2024-01-01
Series:Revue de Géographie Alpine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/rga/13702
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849702098886721536
author Pierre Mercklé
Delphine Moraldo
Caroline Datchary
Benoît Tudoux
author_facet Pierre Mercklé
Delphine Moraldo
Caroline Datchary
Benoît Tudoux
author_sort Pierre Mercklé
collection DOAJ
description Are there social inequalities regarding access to the ‘nearby mountain’ - that is, mountain for day hikes or hikes lasting a few days with overnight stays in tents or refuges? Are they so strong that the hikers who meet on mountain paths and in and around mountain refuges share homogenous social profiles? Or does the ‘nearby mountain’ bring together people from different social backgrounds, with potentially antagonistic approaches and representations of the mountains? And what happens then? To answer these questions, the article draws on the results of a survey conducted between 2015 and 2017 mainly in and around two refuges accessible in a few hours from adjacent towns, one in the Pyrenees and the other in the Alps, using mixed methods (questionnaire, interview, observation, analysis of documentary corpus). The first two parts of the article explore the differentiation logics at work in the social space of recreational uses of the mountains, to show how they articulate in a complex way the tastes for performance (‘to sweat’), nature (‘to contemplate’) and sociability (‘to share’). The final section shows how the relations of domination that produce this particular social space are perceived through the tensions between users, whose discourses, structured by oppositions between ‘them’ and ‘us’, re-translate in the mountains social class relations developed in other social spheres and other spaces. Finally, the analysis shows that the domination of one type of user (belonging to the educated fractions of the privileged classes) and a distinctive type of use of the mountains (combining sporting asceticism, recharching one’s battery and cultivated sociability) means that the mountains are at once the site of opposition between socially differentiated uses, and the site of the maintenance of a dominant legitimate use that tends to overshadow the others.
format Article
id doaj-art-25dc6437146445b7ba8a45cd0ef4daed
institution DOAJ
issn 0035-1121
1760-7426
language deu
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Institut de Géographie Alpine
record_format Article
series Revue de Géographie Alpine
spelling doaj-art-25dc6437146445b7ba8a45cd0ef4daed2025-08-20T03:17:46ZdeuInstitut de Géographie AlpineRevue de Géographie Alpine0035-11211760-74262024-01-01112310.4000/139tyThe (s)elective MountainPierre MerckléDelphine MoraldoCaroline DatcharyBenoît TudouxAre there social inequalities regarding access to the ‘nearby mountain’ - that is, mountain for day hikes or hikes lasting a few days with overnight stays in tents or refuges? Are they so strong that the hikers who meet on mountain paths and in and around mountain refuges share homogenous social profiles? Or does the ‘nearby mountain’ bring together people from different social backgrounds, with potentially antagonistic approaches and representations of the mountains? And what happens then? To answer these questions, the article draws on the results of a survey conducted between 2015 and 2017 mainly in and around two refuges accessible in a few hours from adjacent towns, one in the Pyrenees and the other in the Alps, using mixed methods (questionnaire, interview, observation, analysis of documentary corpus). The first two parts of the article explore the differentiation logics at work in the social space of recreational uses of the mountains, to show how they articulate in a complex way the tastes for performance (‘to sweat’), nature (‘to contemplate’) and sociability (‘to share’). The final section shows how the relations of domination that produce this particular social space are perceived through the tensions between users, whose discourses, structured by oppositions between ‘them’ and ‘us’, re-translate in the mountains social class relations developed in other social spheres and other spaces. Finally, the analysis shows that the domination of one type of user (belonging to the educated fractions of the privileged classes) and a distinctive type of use of the mountains (combining sporting asceticism, recharching one’s battery and cultivated sociability) means that the mountains are at once the site of opposition between socially differentiated uses, and the site of the maintenance of a dominant legitimate use that tends to overshadow the others.https://journals.openedition.org/rga/13702mountainhikingrefugessocial inequalities
spellingShingle Pierre Mercklé
Delphine Moraldo
Caroline Datchary
Benoît Tudoux
The (s)elective Mountain
Revue de Géographie Alpine
mountain
hiking
refuges
social inequalities
title The (s)elective Mountain
title_full The (s)elective Mountain
title_fullStr The (s)elective Mountain
title_full_unstemmed The (s)elective Mountain
title_short The (s)elective Mountain
title_sort s elective mountain
topic mountain
hiking
refuges
social inequalities
url https://journals.openedition.org/rga/13702
work_keys_str_mv AT pierremerckle theselectivemountain
AT delphinemoraldo theselectivemountain
AT carolinedatchary theselectivemountain
AT benoittudoux theselectivemountain
AT pierremerckle selectivemountain
AT delphinemoraldo selectivemountain
AT carolinedatchary selectivemountain
AT benoittudoux selectivemountain