3D computed tomography-dacryocystography (3D CT-DCG) and the contrast agents: direct comparison of Lipiodol and barium sulfate

Abstract To compare the performance of two contrast agents, barium sulfate and lipiodol, in the performance of 3D CT-DCG. A prospective interventional radiological study was performed on 15 lacrimal drainage systems of 14 patients who clinically presented with nasolacrimal duct obstructions. All pat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rafal Nowak, Izabela Nowak-Gospodarowicz, Aleksandra Kinga Kicinska, Marek Rękas, Maja Nowak, Mohammad Javed Ali
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-02-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-89894-1
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849723857771954176
author Rafal Nowak
Izabela Nowak-Gospodarowicz
Aleksandra Kinga Kicinska
Marek Rękas
Maja Nowak
Mohammad Javed Ali
author_facet Rafal Nowak
Izabela Nowak-Gospodarowicz
Aleksandra Kinga Kicinska
Marek Rękas
Maja Nowak
Mohammad Javed Ali
author_sort Rafal Nowak
collection DOAJ
description Abstract To compare the performance of two contrast agents, barium sulfate and lipiodol, in the performance of 3D CT-DCG. A prospective interventional radiological study was performed on 15 lacrimal drainage systems of 14 patients who clinically presented with nasolacrimal duct obstructions. All patients underwent CT-DCG, traditionally first using lipiodol and a week later by barium sulfate. CT-DCG data was used to construct 3D models as per standard published protocols. A 3D software was used to calculate the volume (which reflects the filling ability of the dye) and the number of details (counted by the number of different faces creating the object) of the 3D CT-DCG of the studied lacrimal drainage systems. The analysis was performed in R, version 4.3.2. The overall mean volume of the dye (filling feature) in the 3D CTDCG reconstructed models of the lacrimal system following lipiodol injection was 55.2 mm3 vs. 244.2 mm3 with barium sulfate (p < 0.001). A minimum of 94% gain was noted in volume with barium sulfate contrast (p < 0.001). The barium sulfate was superior to lipiodol for the same lacrimal drainage system and provided a better appreciation of lacrimal drainage details. The visualization of the stenosis and obstructions of the nasolacrimal duct were better delineated. The filling defects in cases of dacryoliths were more pronounced with barium sulfate with intricate visualization of the presumed shape and size of the dacryolith. The present study is the first to highlight the advantages of barium sulfate over the traditional contrast agent, lipiodol, for the acquisition of 3D CT-DCG images. Barium sulfate is a viable alternative and an economically more feasible option for performing 3D CT-DCG.
format Article
id doaj-art-25af950efb9e4618b486045defecde6e
institution DOAJ
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-25af950efb9e4618b486045defecde6e2025-08-20T03:10:54ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-02-011511810.1038/s41598-025-89894-13D computed tomography-dacryocystography (3D CT-DCG) and the contrast agents: direct comparison of Lipiodol and barium sulfateRafal Nowak0Izabela Nowak-Gospodarowicz1Aleksandra Kinga Kicinska2Marek Rękas3Maja Nowak4Mohammad Javed Ali5Department of Ophthalmology, Jozef Strus City HospitalDepartment of Ophthalmology, Military Institute of Medicine-National Research InstituteDepartment of Ophthalmology, Military Institute of Medicine-National Research InstituteDepartment of Ophthalmology, Military Institute of Medicine-National Research InstituteDepartment of Ophthalmology, Jozef Strus City HospitalGovindram Seksaria Institute of Dacryology, L.V. Prasad Eye InstituteAbstract To compare the performance of two contrast agents, barium sulfate and lipiodol, in the performance of 3D CT-DCG. A prospective interventional radiological study was performed on 15 lacrimal drainage systems of 14 patients who clinically presented with nasolacrimal duct obstructions. All patients underwent CT-DCG, traditionally first using lipiodol and a week later by barium sulfate. CT-DCG data was used to construct 3D models as per standard published protocols. A 3D software was used to calculate the volume (which reflects the filling ability of the dye) and the number of details (counted by the number of different faces creating the object) of the 3D CT-DCG of the studied lacrimal drainage systems. The analysis was performed in R, version 4.3.2. The overall mean volume of the dye (filling feature) in the 3D CTDCG reconstructed models of the lacrimal system following lipiodol injection was 55.2 mm3 vs. 244.2 mm3 with barium sulfate (p < 0.001). A minimum of 94% gain was noted in volume with barium sulfate contrast (p < 0.001). The barium sulfate was superior to lipiodol for the same lacrimal drainage system and provided a better appreciation of lacrimal drainage details. The visualization of the stenosis and obstructions of the nasolacrimal duct were better delineated. The filling defects in cases of dacryoliths were more pronounced with barium sulfate with intricate visualization of the presumed shape and size of the dacryolith. The present study is the first to highlight the advantages of barium sulfate over the traditional contrast agent, lipiodol, for the acquisition of 3D CT-DCG images. Barium sulfate is a viable alternative and an economically more feasible option for performing 3D CT-DCG.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-89894-1DacryocystographyLacrimal imagingCTNasolacrimal duct obstructionDacryolith
spellingShingle Rafal Nowak
Izabela Nowak-Gospodarowicz
Aleksandra Kinga Kicinska
Marek Rękas
Maja Nowak
Mohammad Javed Ali
3D computed tomography-dacryocystography (3D CT-DCG) and the contrast agents: direct comparison of Lipiodol and barium sulfate
Scientific Reports
Dacryocystography
Lacrimal imaging
CT
Nasolacrimal duct obstruction
Dacryolith
title 3D computed tomography-dacryocystography (3D CT-DCG) and the contrast agents: direct comparison of Lipiodol and barium sulfate
title_full 3D computed tomography-dacryocystography (3D CT-DCG) and the contrast agents: direct comparison of Lipiodol and barium sulfate
title_fullStr 3D computed tomography-dacryocystography (3D CT-DCG) and the contrast agents: direct comparison of Lipiodol and barium sulfate
title_full_unstemmed 3D computed tomography-dacryocystography (3D CT-DCG) and the contrast agents: direct comparison of Lipiodol and barium sulfate
title_short 3D computed tomography-dacryocystography (3D CT-DCG) and the contrast agents: direct comparison of Lipiodol and barium sulfate
title_sort 3d computed tomography dacryocystography 3d ct dcg and the contrast agents direct comparison of lipiodol and barium sulfate
topic Dacryocystography
Lacrimal imaging
CT
Nasolacrimal duct obstruction
Dacryolith
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-89894-1
work_keys_str_mv AT rafalnowak 3dcomputedtomographydacryocystography3dctdcgandthecontrastagentsdirectcomparisonoflipiodolandbariumsulfate
AT izabelanowakgospodarowicz 3dcomputedtomographydacryocystography3dctdcgandthecontrastagentsdirectcomparisonoflipiodolandbariumsulfate
AT aleksandrakingakicinska 3dcomputedtomographydacryocystography3dctdcgandthecontrastagentsdirectcomparisonoflipiodolandbariumsulfate
AT marekrekas 3dcomputedtomographydacryocystography3dctdcgandthecontrastagentsdirectcomparisonoflipiodolandbariumsulfate
AT majanowak 3dcomputedtomographydacryocystography3dctdcgandthecontrastagentsdirectcomparisonoflipiodolandbariumsulfate
AT mohammadjavedali 3dcomputedtomographydacryocystography3dctdcgandthecontrastagentsdirectcomparisonoflipiodolandbariumsulfate