Evaluating Safety and Effectiveness of Switching Biologics in Managing Severe Asthma Patients

Leena Al Awn,1– 3 Maha AlAmmari,1– 3 Dalal AlAbdulkarim,1– 3 Reem AlAhmed,3– 5 Bijesh Yadav,3,5 Hamdan AL-Jahdali3– 5 1Department of Pharmaceutical Care Services, King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 2College of Pharmacy, King Saud bin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Al Awn L, AlAmmari M, AlAbdulkarim D, AlAhmed R, Yadav B, AL-Jahdali H
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2025-08-01
Series:Journal of Asthma and Allergy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/evaluating-safety-and-effectiveness-of-switching-biologics-in-managing-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-JAA
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850038680128847872
author Al Awn L
AlAmmari M
AlAbdulkarim D
AlAhmed R
Yadav B
AL-Jahdali H
author_facet Al Awn L
AlAmmari M
AlAbdulkarim D
AlAhmed R
Yadav B
AL-Jahdali H
author_sort Al Awn L
collection DOAJ
description Leena Al Awn,1– 3 Maha AlAmmari,1– 3 Dalal AlAbdulkarim,1– 3 Reem AlAhmed,3– 5 Bijesh Yadav,3,5 Hamdan AL-Jahdali3– 5 1Department of Pharmaceutical Care Services, King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 2College of Pharmacy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 3King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 4Department of medicine, King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 5College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), Riyadh, Saudi ArabiaCorrespondence: Leena Al Awn, Email leena7ibraheem@gmail.comBackground: The Saudi Initiative for Asthma (SINA) defines severe asthma as asthma that is uncontrolled at SINA step 4 despite optimized management. Choosing the biologic agent that is most appropriate for each patient can be difficult for clinicians. Thus, switching to another biologic agent due to no or suboptimal response is a common practice among asthma specialists. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of switching biologics in patients with severe asthma at a tertiary care center.Methods: This was an observational retrospective cohort single-center study conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City-Central Region, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. All adult patients ≥ 18 years of age with a confirmed diagnosis of severe asthma and who were switched from one biologic agent (omalizumab, mepolizumab and dupilumab) to another were included.Results: Thirty-three patients were included in the final analysis. In the majority of patients (81%), switching occurred due to lack of clinical efficacy. Most patients were maintained on the first and second biologic for 6 months or more. Most switching occurred from omalizumab to mepolizumab and dupilumab was the most frequently used last-line biologic (54%). Compared to the first biologic, the mean number of exacerbations decreased after switching to a different biologic (6.6 vs 3.9, p = 0.1). On the other hand, sinus symptoms improved after patients were switched to a different biologic (18.5% vs 37.5%, p = 0.1).Conclusion: Switching from one biologic agent to another is effective and safe in patients who are not optimally controlled on the initial treatment. National and international guidelines should define and include criteria for switching biologics.Keywords: asthma, biologics, switching, effectiveness, safety
format Article
id doaj-art-25a940e280894b40bb0a019605b4366b
institution DOAJ
issn 1178-6965
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Asthma and Allergy
spelling doaj-art-25a940e280894b40bb0a019605b4366b2025-08-20T02:56:31ZengDove Medical PressJournal of Asthma and Allergy1178-69652025-08-01Volume 18Issue 111611166105456Evaluating Safety and Effectiveness of Switching Biologics in Managing Severe Asthma PatientsAl Awn L0AlAmmari M1AlAbdulkarim D2AlAhmed RYadav B3AL-Jahdali H4Pharmaceutical care services departmentDepartment of Pharmaceutical CarePharmaceutical Care Service and King Abdullah International Medical Research CenterBiostatisticsPulmonary Division-Sleep Disorder Center, Department of MedicineLeena Al Awn,1– 3 Maha AlAmmari,1– 3 Dalal AlAbdulkarim,1– 3 Reem AlAhmed,3– 5 Bijesh Yadav,3,5 Hamdan AL-Jahdali3– 5 1Department of Pharmaceutical Care Services, King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 2College of Pharmacy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 3King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 4Department of medicine, King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 5College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), Riyadh, Saudi ArabiaCorrespondence: Leena Al Awn, Email leena7ibraheem@gmail.comBackground: The Saudi Initiative for Asthma (SINA) defines severe asthma as asthma that is uncontrolled at SINA step 4 despite optimized management. Choosing the biologic agent that is most appropriate for each patient can be difficult for clinicians. Thus, switching to another biologic agent due to no or suboptimal response is a common practice among asthma specialists. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of switching biologics in patients with severe asthma at a tertiary care center.Methods: This was an observational retrospective cohort single-center study conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City-Central Region, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. All adult patients ≥ 18 years of age with a confirmed diagnosis of severe asthma and who were switched from one biologic agent (omalizumab, mepolizumab and dupilumab) to another were included.Results: Thirty-three patients were included in the final analysis. In the majority of patients (81%), switching occurred due to lack of clinical efficacy. Most patients were maintained on the first and second biologic for 6 months or more. Most switching occurred from omalizumab to mepolizumab and dupilumab was the most frequently used last-line biologic (54%). Compared to the first biologic, the mean number of exacerbations decreased after switching to a different biologic (6.6 vs 3.9, p = 0.1). On the other hand, sinus symptoms improved after patients were switched to a different biologic (18.5% vs 37.5%, p = 0.1).Conclusion: Switching from one biologic agent to another is effective and safe in patients who are not optimally controlled on the initial treatment. National and international guidelines should define and include criteria for switching biologics.Keywords: asthma, biologics, switching, effectiveness, safetyhttps://www.dovepress.com/evaluating-safety-and-effectiveness-of-switching-biologics-in-managing-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-JAAAsthmabiologicsswitchingeffectivenesssafety
spellingShingle Al Awn L
AlAmmari M
AlAbdulkarim D
AlAhmed R
Yadav B
AL-Jahdali H
Evaluating Safety and Effectiveness of Switching Biologics in Managing Severe Asthma Patients
Journal of Asthma and Allergy
Asthma
biologics
switching
effectiveness
safety
title Evaluating Safety and Effectiveness of Switching Biologics in Managing Severe Asthma Patients
title_full Evaluating Safety and Effectiveness of Switching Biologics in Managing Severe Asthma Patients
title_fullStr Evaluating Safety and Effectiveness of Switching Biologics in Managing Severe Asthma Patients
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Safety and Effectiveness of Switching Biologics in Managing Severe Asthma Patients
title_short Evaluating Safety and Effectiveness of Switching Biologics in Managing Severe Asthma Patients
title_sort evaluating safety and effectiveness of switching biologics in managing severe asthma patients
topic Asthma
biologics
switching
effectiveness
safety
url https://www.dovepress.com/evaluating-safety-and-effectiveness-of-switching-biologics-in-managing-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-JAA
work_keys_str_mv AT alawnl evaluatingsafetyandeffectivenessofswitchingbiologicsinmanagingsevereasthmapatients
AT alammarim evaluatingsafetyandeffectivenessofswitchingbiologicsinmanagingsevereasthmapatients
AT alabdulkarimd evaluatingsafetyandeffectivenessofswitchingbiologicsinmanagingsevereasthmapatients
AT alahmedr evaluatingsafetyandeffectivenessofswitchingbiologicsinmanagingsevereasthmapatients
AT yadavb evaluatingsafetyandeffectivenessofswitchingbiologicsinmanagingsevereasthmapatients
AT aljahdalih evaluatingsafetyandeffectivenessofswitchingbiologicsinmanagingsevereasthmapatients