Multiple fishways mostly maintain upstream teleost movement in a south-eastern Australian river

River development affects fish connectivity, with intra-river issues exacerbated via sequential barriers. Remediation typically involves installing ‘fishways' to facilitate upstream movements. Here we evaluated species-specific upstream fish-passage efficiencies through three sequential vertica...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Meaghan L. Rourke, Wayne Robinson, Lee J. Baumgartner, Jonathon Doyle, Martin Mallen-Cooper, Jason D. Thiem, Matt K. Broadhurst
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Fish Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frish.2025.1571172/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850041426968051712
author Meaghan L. Rourke
Meaghan L. Rourke
Wayne Robinson
Wayne Robinson
Lee J. Baumgartner
Jonathon Doyle
Martin Mallen-Cooper
Martin Mallen-Cooper
Jason D. Thiem
Jason D. Thiem
Matt K. Broadhurst
Matt K. Broadhurst
author_facet Meaghan L. Rourke
Meaghan L. Rourke
Wayne Robinson
Wayne Robinson
Lee J. Baumgartner
Jonathon Doyle
Martin Mallen-Cooper
Martin Mallen-Cooper
Jason D. Thiem
Jason D. Thiem
Matt K. Broadhurst
Matt K. Broadhurst
author_sort Meaghan L. Rourke
collection DOAJ
description River development affects fish connectivity, with intra-river issues exacerbated via sequential barriers. Remediation typically involves installing ‘fishways' to facilitate upstream movements. Here we evaluated species-specific upstream fish-passage efficiencies through three sequential vertical-slot fishways along the Nepean River in Australia via paired entry and exit trapping. Species-specific water velocity preferences associated with fishway entrance were informed by restricting head loss at the entry traps, but not at the exit traps. During 78 paired trap deployments 26,139 fish were caught, comprising 19 species; most of which successfully negotiated the fishways—albeit with considerable inter- and intra-specific variability among fishways. Catches of the most abundant species (38% of total), the amphidromous Gobiomorphus coxii (20–160 mm total length; TL), in the entry and exit traps were negatively and positively affected by water velocity, respectively at the second and third fishways, but not at the first. Catches of other species were also directly or indirectly affected by water velocity, with fewer catadromous Trachystoma petardi (145–460 mm fork length; FL) and Mugil cephalus (35–410 mm FL) recorded in entry than exit traps, implying (1) insufficient water velocity to permit entry and/or (2) confounding effects of the entry-trap design on capture. Conversely, two gudgeons [the potamodromous Philypnodon grandiceps (29–77 mm TL) and Hypseleotris galii (31–49 mm TL)] were caught in significantly greater abundances in the entry than exit traps implying some restriction to their passage and possibly due to deficits in fishway hydraulics and/or a lack of motivation to migrate in these species. The study highlights the value of location-specific monitoring for identifying key factors affecting fishway performance.
format Article
id doaj-art-25678eb3e5904583932e367cc1cc33ba
institution DOAJ
issn 2813-9097
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Fish Science
spelling doaj-art-25678eb3e5904583932e367cc1cc33ba2025-08-20T02:55:48ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Fish Science2813-90972025-04-01310.3389/frish.2025.15711721571172Multiple fishways mostly maintain upstream teleost movement in a south-eastern Australian riverMeaghan L. Rourke0Meaghan L. Rourke1Wayne Robinson2Wayne Robinson3Lee J. Baumgartner4Jonathon Doyle5Martin Mallen-Cooper6Martin Mallen-Cooper7Jason D. Thiem8Jason D. Thiem9Matt K. Broadhurst10Matt K. Broadhurst11NSW Department of Primary Industries, Narrandera Fisheries Centre, Narrandera, NSW, AustraliaGubali Institute for Agriculture, Water and Environment, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW, AustraliaNSW Department of Primary Industries, Narrandera Fisheries Centre, Narrandera, NSW, AustraliaGubali Institute for Agriculture, Water and Environment, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW, AustraliaGubali Institute for Agriculture, Water and Environment, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW, AustraliaNSW Department of Primary Industries, Narrandera Fisheries Centre, Narrandera, NSW, AustraliaGubali Institute for Agriculture, Water and Environment, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW, AustraliaFishway Consulting Services, St Ives Chase, NSW, AustraliaNSW Department of Primary Industries, Narrandera Fisheries Centre, Narrandera, NSW, AustraliaGubali Institute for Agriculture, Water and Environment, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW, AustraliaFisheries Conservation Technology Unit, NSW Department of Primary Industries, National Marine Science Centre, Southern Cross University, Coffs Harbour, NSW, AustraliaSchool of the Environment, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaRiver development affects fish connectivity, with intra-river issues exacerbated via sequential barriers. Remediation typically involves installing ‘fishways' to facilitate upstream movements. Here we evaluated species-specific upstream fish-passage efficiencies through three sequential vertical-slot fishways along the Nepean River in Australia via paired entry and exit trapping. Species-specific water velocity preferences associated with fishway entrance were informed by restricting head loss at the entry traps, but not at the exit traps. During 78 paired trap deployments 26,139 fish were caught, comprising 19 species; most of which successfully negotiated the fishways—albeit with considerable inter- and intra-specific variability among fishways. Catches of the most abundant species (38% of total), the amphidromous Gobiomorphus coxii (20–160 mm total length; TL), in the entry and exit traps were negatively and positively affected by water velocity, respectively at the second and third fishways, but not at the first. Catches of other species were also directly or indirectly affected by water velocity, with fewer catadromous Trachystoma petardi (145–460 mm fork length; FL) and Mugil cephalus (35–410 mm FL) recorded in entry than exit traps, implying (1) insufficient water velocity to permit entry and/or (2) confounding effects of the entry-trap design on capture. Conversely, two gudgeons [the potamodromous Philypnodon grandiceps (29–77 mm TL) and Hypseleotris galii (31–49 mm TL)] were caught in significantly greater abundances in the entry than exit traps implying some restriction to their passage and possibly due to deficits in fishway hydraulics and/or a lack of motivation to migrate in these species. The study highlights the value of location-specific monitoring for identifying key factors affecting fishway performance.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frish.2025.1571172/fullbarriersvertical-slot fishwaymigrationdiadromyfishway trapping
spellingShingle Meaghan L. Rourke
Meaghan L. Rourke
Wayne Robinson
Wayne Robinson
Lee J. Baumgartner
Jonathon Doyle
Martin Mallen-Cooper
Martin Mallen-Cooper
Jason D. Thiem
Jason D. Thiem
Matt K. Broadhurst
Matt K. Broadhurst
Multiple fishways mostly maintain upstream teleost movement in a south-eastern Australian river
Frontiers in Fish Science
barriers
vertical-slot fishway
migration
diadromy
fishway trapping
title Multiple fishways mostly maintain upstream teleost movement in a south-eastern Australian river
title_full Multiple fishways mostly maintain upstream teleost movement in a south-eastern Australian river
title_fullStr Multiple fishways mostly maintain upstream teleost movement in a south-eastern Australian river
title_full_unstemmed Multiple fishways mostly maintain upstream teleost movement in a south-eastern Australian river
title_short Multiple fishways mostly maintain upstream teleost movement in a south-eastern Australian river
title_sort multiple fishways mostly maintain upstream teleost movement in a south eastern australian river
topic barriers
vertical-slot fishway
migration
diadromy
fishway trapping
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frish.2025.1571172/full
work_keys_str_mv AT meaghanlrourke multiplefishwaysmostlymaintainupstreamteleostmovementinasoutheasternaustralianriver
AT meaghanlrourke multiplefishwaysmostlymaintainupstreamteleostmovementinasoutheasternaustralianriver
AT waynerobinson multiplefishwaysmostlymaintainupstreamteleostmovementinasoutheasternaustralianriver
AT waynerobinson multiplefishwaysmostlymaintainupstreamteleostmovementinasoutheasternaustralianriver
AT leejbaumgartner multiplefishwaysmostlymaintainupstreamteleostmovementinasoutheasternaustralianriver
AT jonathondoyle multiplefishwaysmostlymaintainupstreamteleostmovementinasoutheasternaustralianriver
AT martinmallencooper multiplefishwaysmostlymaintainupstreamteleostmovementinasoutheasternaustralianriver
AT martinmallencooper multiplefishwaysmostlymaintainupstreamteleostmovementinasoutheasternaustralianriver
AT jasondthiem multiplefishwaysmostlymaintainupstreamteleostmovementinasoutheasternaustralianriver
AT jasondthiem multiplefishwaysmostlymaintainupstreamteleostmovementinasoutheasternaustralianriver
AT mattkbroadhurst multiplefishwaysmostlymaintainupstreamteleostmovementinasoutheasternaustralianriver
AT mattkbroadhurst multiplefishwaysmostlymaintainupstreamteleostmovementinasoutheasternaustralianriver