Implants with a Laser-microgrooved Collar Placed in Grafted Posterior Maxillary Extraction Sockets and in Crestally Grafted Sinuses: a 5-Year Multicentre Retrospective Study

Objectives: The aim of this retrospective multicentre cohort study was to compare clinical outcomes, soft tissues conditions and differences in marginal bone loss between implants with a laser-microgrooved collar placed in posterior maxillary extraction sockets grafted by 4 to 5 months, and in poste...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Renzo Guarnieri, Luca Savio, Alessandro Bermonds, Luca Testarelli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Faculty of Odontology 2020-12-01
Series:eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ejomr.org/JOMR/archives/2020/4/e2/v11n4e2ht.htm
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849247778628173824
author Renzo Guarnieri
Luca Savio
Alessandro Bermonds
Luca Testarelli
author_facet Renzo Guarnieri
Luca Savio
Alessandro Bermonds
Luca Testarelli
author_sort Renzo Guarnieri
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: The aim of this retrospective multicentre cohort study was to compare clinical outcomes, soft tissues conditions and differences in marginal bone loss between implants with a laser-microgrooved collar placed in posterior maxillary extraction sockets grafted by 4 to 5 months, and in posterior maxillary pristine bone (spontaneously healed posterior maxillary extraction sockets) by means of osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation, over a period of 5 years after functional loading. Material and Methods: Patients of Group 1 underwent extractions with sockets preservation using porcine-derived bone, covered with collagen membrane. Group 2 underwent extractions without socket preservation. Patients of Group 1 received implants in grafted sites, and Group 2 received implants in spontaneously healed bone using a maxillary sinus lift with crestal approach. Results: Over the observation period, the overall clinical success rate in Group 1 and Group 2 was 98% and 100%, respectively, with no differences between the procedures and implants used. Cumulative radiographic marginal bone loss ranged from 0.03 to 0.39 mm after 60 months of functional loading. There were no statistically significant differences in marginal bone loss between short and standard-length implants placed in grafted extraction sockets and in pristine bone. Conclusions: Short and standard implants with a laser-microgrooved collar, placed in posterior maxillary extraction sockets grafted by 4 to 5 months, and in posterior maxillary pristine bone (spontaneously healed posterior maxillary extraction sockets) by means of osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation, exhibited no statistical difference in success rate, clinical parameters and marginal bone loss
format Article
id doaj-art-24e9ab99b83e4fb6baa59afacbf52921
institution Kabale University
issn 2029-283X
language English
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Faculty of Odontology
record_format Article
series eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research
spelling doaj-art-24e9ab99b83e4fb6baa59afacbf529212025-08-20T03:58:07ZengLithuanian University of Health Sciences, Faculty of OdontologyeJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research2029-283X2020-12-01114e210.5037/jomr.2020.11402Implants with a Laser-microgrooved Collar Placed in Grafted Posterior Maxillary Extraction Sockets and in Crestally Grafted Sinuses: a 5-Year Multicentre Retrospective StudyRenzo GuarnieriLuca SavioAlessandro BermondsLuca TestarelliObjectives: The aim of this retrospective multicentre cohort study was to compare clinical outcomes, soft tissues conditions and differences in marginal bone loss between implants with a laser-microgrooved collar placed in posterior maxillary extraction sockets grafted by 4 to 5 months, and in posterior maxillary pristine bone (spontaneously healed posterior maxillary extraction sockets) by means of osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation, over a period of 5 years after functional loading. Material and Methods: Patients of Group 1 underwent extractions with sockets preservation using porcine-derived bone, covered with collagen membrane. Group 2 underwent extractions without socket preservation. Patients of Group 1 received implants in grafted sites, and Group 2 received implants in spontaneously healed bone using a maxillary sinus lift with crestal approach. Results: Over the observation period, the overall clinical success rate in Group 1 and Group 2 was 98% and 100%, respectively, with no differences between the procedures and implants used. Cumulative radiographic marginal bone loss ranged from 0.03 to 0.39 mm after 60 months of functional loading. There were no statistically significant differences in marginal bone loss between short and standard-length implants placed in grafted extraction sockets and in pristine bone. Conclusions: Short and standard implants with a laser-microgrooved collar, placed in posterior maxillary extraction sockets grafted by 4 to 5 months, and in posterior maxillary pristine bone (spontaneously healed posterior maxillary extraction sockets) by means of osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation, exhibited no statistical difference in success rate, clinical parameters and marginal bone losshttps://www.ejomr.org/JOMR/archives/2020/4/e2/v11n4e2ht.htmalveolar ridge augmentationdental implantssinus floor augmentationtooth extraction
spellingShingle Renzo Guarnieri
Luca Savio
Alessandro Bermonds
Luca Testarelli
Implants with a Laser-microgrooved Collar Placed in Grafted Posterior Maxillary Extraction Sockets and in Crestally Grafted Sinuses: a 5-Year Multicentre Retrospective Study
eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research
alveolar ridge augmentation
dental implants
sinus floor augmentation
tooth extraction
title Implants with a Laser-microgrooved Collar Placed in Grafted Posterior Maxillary Extraction Sockets and in Crestally Grafted Sinuses: a 5-Year Multicentre Retrospective Study
title_full Implants with a Laser-microgrooved Collar Placed in Grafted Posterior Maxillary Extraction Sockets and in Crestally Grafted Sinuses: a 5-Year Multicentre Retrospective Study
title_fullStr Implants with a Laser-microgrooved Collar Placed in Grafted Posterior Maxillary Extraction Sockets and in Crestally Grafted Sinuses: a 5-Year Multicentre Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Implants with a Laser-microgrooved Collar Placed in Grafted Posterior Maxillary Extraction Sockets and in Crestally Grafted Sinuses: a 5-Year Multicentre Retrospective Study
title_short Implants with a Laser-microgrooved Collar Placed in Grafted Posterior Maxillary Extraction Sockets and in Crestally Grafted Sinuses: a 5-Year Multicentre Retrospective Study
title_sort implants with a laser microgrooved collar placed in grafted posterior maxillary extraction sockets and in crestally grafted sinuses a 5 year multicentre retrospective study
topic alveolar ridge augmentation
dental implants
sinus floor augmentation
tooth extraction
url https://www.ejomr.org/JOMR/archives/2020/4/e2/v11n4e2ht.htm
work_keys_str_mv AT renzoguarnieri implantswithalasermicrogroovedcollarplacedingraftedposteriormaxillaryextractionsocketsandincrestallygraftedsinusesa5yearmulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT lucasavio implantswithalasermicrogroovedcollarplacedingraftedposteriormaxillaryextractionsocketsandincrestallygraftedsinusesa5yearmulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT alessandrobermonds implantswithalasermicrogroovedcollarplacedingraftedposteriormaxillaryextractionsocketsandincrestallygraftedsinusesa5yearmulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT lucatestarelli implantswithalasermicrogroovedcollarplacedingraftedposteriormaxillaryextractionsocketsandincrestallygraftedsinusesa5yearmulticentreretrospectivestudy