On the specifics of valuing effort: a developmental and a formalized perspective on preferences for cognitive and physical effort
Effort is instrumental for goal pursuit. But its exertion is aversive and people tend to invest as little effort as possible. Contrary to this principle of least effort, research shows that effort is sometimes treated as if it was valuable in its own right, and people exhibit stable differences with...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Peer Community In
2024-08-01
|
| Series: | Peer Community Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://peercommunityjournal.org/articles/10.24072/pcjournal.444/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1825206374574850048 |
|---|---|
| author | Wolff, Wanja Stähler, Johanna Schüler, Julia Bieleke, Maik |
| author_facet | Wolff, Wanja Stähler, Johanna Schüler, Julia Bieleke, Maik |
| author_sort | Wolff, Wanja |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Effort is instrumental for goal pursuit. But its exertion is aversive and people tend to invest as little effort as possible. Contrary to this principle of least effort, research shows that effort is sometimes treated as if it was valuable in its own right, and people exhibit stable differences with respect to their valuation of effort. Critically, individual-difference research that investigates if this valuation of effort is domain-general or specific to cognitive or physical contexts is lacking. Simply put, do people value (or not) any effort or are preferences specific to the cognitive and/or physical domain? Here, we investigate this question using a formalized mathematical approach (study 1) and from a developmental perspective (study 2). Study 1 employed a validated decomposed binary decision task to measure preferences regarding the allocation of cognitive versus physical effort. In a sample of N = 299 paid online workers (37% female, Mage = 38.79 ± 11.24 years), we found that people differ markedly with respect to their preferred effort allocation. Multinomial regression analyses revealed that the disposition to value cognitive effort was linked to a preference for high cognitive effort, whereas the disposition to value physical effort was associated with a preference for physical effort. In study 2, we tested the robustness of these hypothetical preferences for effort allocations in a field context: In a sample of N = 300 schoolchildren (61% female, Mage = 15.25 ± 1.57 years), we found that the disposition to value cognitive effort was linked to better grades in mathematics but not sports, whereas valuing physical effort was linked to better grades in sports but not mathematics. Supporting the hypothesis that people find activities of low value boring, valuing cognitive effort was linked to less boredom in mathematics and valuing physical effort was linked to less boredom in sports. Taken together, these results suggest that people are specific in the type of effort they value (or not), and these preferences are present already at young age. This has theoretical and practical implications with respect to how people approach effortful tasks. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-24e7f796e18942caabea2acc617fcf89 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2804-3871 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-08-01 |
| publisher | Peer Community In |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Peer Community Journal |
| spelling | doaj-art-24e7f796e18942caabea2acc617fcf892025-02-07T10:17:18ZengPeer Community InPeer Community Journal2804-38712024-08-01410.24072/pcjournal.44410.24072/pcjournal.444On the specifics of valuing effort: a developmental and a formalized perspective on preferences for cognitive and physical effort Wolff, Wanja0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8130-0272Stähler, Johanna1https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4146-3966Schüler, Julia2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7790-0491Bieleke, Maik3https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2586-1416Dynamics of Human Performance Regulation Laboratory, Department of Movement Science, University of Hamburg, GermanyDepartment of Sport Science, University of Konstanz, GermanyDepartment of Sport Science, University of Konstanz, GermanyDepartment of Sport Science, University of Konstanz, GermanyEffort is instrumental for goal pursuit. But its exertion is aversive and people tend to invest as little effort as possible. Contrary to this principle of least effort, research shows that effort is sometimes treated as if it was valuable in its own right, and people exhibit stable differences with respect to their valuation of effort. Critically, individual-difference research that investigates if this valuation of effort is domain-general or specific to cognitive or physical contexts is lacking. Simply put, do people value (or not) any effort or are preferences specific to the cognitive and/or physical domain? Here, we investigate this question using a formalized mathematical approach (study 1) and from a developmental perspective (study 2). Study 1 employed a validated decomposed binary decision task to measure preferences regarding the allocation of cognitive versus physical effort. In a sample of N = 299 paid online workers (37% female, Mage = 38.79 ± 11.24 years), we found that people differ markedly with respect to their preferred effort allocation. Multinomial regression analyses revealed that the disposition to value cognitive effort was linked to a preference for high cognitive effort, whereas the disposition to value physical effort was associated with a preference for physical effort. In study 2, we tested the robustness of these hypothetical preferences for effort allocations in a field context: In a sample of N = 300 schoolchildren (61% female, Mage = 15.25 ± 1.57 years), we found that the disposition to value cognitive effort was linked to better grades in mathematics but not sports, whereas valuing physical effort was linked to better grades in sports but not mathematics. Supporting the hypothesis that people find activities of low value boring, valuing cognitive effort was linked to less boredom in mathematics and valuing physical effort was linked to less boredom in sports. Taken together, these results suggest that people are specific in the type of effort they value (or not), and these preferences are present already at young age. This has theoretical and practical implications with respect to how people approach effortful tasks.https://peercommunityjournal.org/articles/10.24072/pcjournal.444/effort, cognitive effort, physical effort, boredom, sports, school, Ring Task, decision making |
| spellingShingle | Wolff, Wanja Stähler, Johanna Schüler, Julia Bieleke, Maik On the specifics of valuing effort: a developmental and a formalized perspective on preferences for cognitive and physical effort Peer Community Journal effort, cognitive effort, physical effort, boredom, sports, school, Ring Task, decision making |
| title | On the specifics of valuing effort: a developmental and a formalized perspective on preferences for cognitive and physical effort
|
| title_full | On the specifics of valuing effort: a developmental and a formalized perspective on preferences for cognitive and physical effort
|
| title_fullStr | On the specifics of valuing effort: a developmental and a formalized perspective on preferences for cognitive and physical effort
|
| title_full_unstemmed | On the specifics of valuing effort: a developmental and a formalized perspective on preferences for cognitive and physical effort
|
| title_short | On the specifics of valuing effort: a developmental and a formalized perspective on preferences for cognitive and physical effort
|
| title_sort | on the specifics of valuing effort a developmental and a formalized perspective on preferences for cognitive and physical effort |
| topic | effort, cognitive effort, physical effort, boredom, sports, school, Ring Task, decision making |
| url | https://peercommunityjournal.org/articles/10.24072/pcjournal.444/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT wolffwanja onthespecificsofvaluingeffortadevelopmentalandaformalizedperspectiveonpreferencesforcognitiveandphysicaleffort AT stahlerjohanna onthespecificsofvaluingeffortadevelopmentalandaformalizedperspectiveonpreferencesforcognitiveandphysicaleffort AT schulerjulia onthespecificsofvaluingeffortadevelopmentalandaformalizedperspectiveonpreferencesforcognitiveandphysicaleffort AT bielekemaik onthespecificsofvaluingeffortadevelopmentalandaformalizedperspectiveonpreferencesforcognitiveandphysicaleffort |