The Inheritance of the Precept Tradition in 18th- and 19th-Century East Asian Buddhism and the Prelude to Modernity: Comparing the Korean and Japanese Precept Revival Movements

This article compares the precept revival movements in Korean and Japanese Buddhism in the early modern period. It examines how monks in both countries, in particular, in the Korean Hyujŏng lineage and the Japanese Shingon sect, restored and utilized the precept tradition to re-establish Buddhist id...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jarang Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-04-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/16/4/492
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849713518869217280
author Jarang Lee
author_facet Jarang Lee
author_sort Jarang Lee
collection DOAJ
description This article compares the precept revival movements in Korean and Japanese Buddhism in the early modern period. It examines how monks in both countries, in particular, in the Korean Hyujŏng lineage and the Japanese Shingon sect, restored and utilized the precept tradition to re-establish Buddhist identity in the midst of rapid political and social change. Although in different ways, Buddhism in the early modern period in both countries experienced state control and an anti-Buddhist milieu, making it difficult to maintain its religious identity. Various efforts were made to overcome this hardship, the most prominent of which was the precept revival movement. In the early 19th century, in Chosŏn Korea, Taeŭn and Paekp’a sought to restore the bhikṣu lineage by overhauling the bhikṣu ordination rituals through the “reception of the precepts through an auspicious sign” and “the reception of the ten wholesome precepts”, respectively, while in mid-to-late 18th-century Japan, the Shingon master Jiun advocated a return to the teachings of Śākyamuni through the Shōbō-ritsu movement. While both countries focused on precept revival as a way to solidify Buddhist religious identity, Korea emphasized the restoration of the bhikṣu lineage, while Japan, especially in the Shingon-shū, emphasized a return to the fundamental teachings of the Buddha. These differences stem from the unique historical backgrounds of the two countries and the distinctive developments of their Buddhist traditions. By comparing the precept revival movements in both countries, this study examines how different precept traditions influenced the identity of East Asian Buddhism in the early modern period and how these efforts have been fundamental in maintaining Buddhist orthodoxy into the modern era.
format Article
id doaj-art-24e188ffed0740fe9940837630ede08b
institution DOAJ
issn 2077-1444
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Religions
spelling doaj-art-24e188ffed0740fe9940837630ede08b2025-08-20T03:13:57ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442025-04-0116449210.3390/rel16040492The Inheritance of the Precept Tradition in 18th- and 19th-Century East Asian Buddhism and the Prelude to Modernity: Comparing the Korean and Japanese Precept Revival MovementsJarang Lee0Academy of Buddhist Studies, Dongguk University, Seoul 04620, Republic of KoreaThis article compares the precept revival movements in Korean and Japanese Buddhism in the early modern period. It examines how monks in both countries, in particular, in the Korean Hyujŏng lineage and the Japanese Shingon sect, restored and utilized the precept tradition to re-establish Buddhist identity in the midst of rapid political and social change. Although in different ways, Buddhism in the early modern period in both countries experienced state control and an anti-Buddhist milieu, making it difficult to maintain its religious identity. Various efforts were made to overcome this hardship, the most prominent of which was the precept revival movement. In the early 19th century, in Chosŏn Korea, Taeŭn and Paekp’a sought to restore the bhikṣu lineage by overhauling the bhikṣu ordination rituals through the “reception of the precepts through an auspicious sign” and “the reception of the ten wholesome precepts”, respectively, while in mid-to-late 18th-century Japan, the Shingon master Jiun advocated a return to the teachings of Śākyamuni through the Shōbō-ritsu movement. While both countries focused on precept revival as a way to solidify Buddhist religious identity, Korea emphasized the restoration of the bhikṣu lineage, while Japan, especially in the Shingon-shū, emphasized a return to the fundamental teachings of the Buddha. These differences stem from the unique historical backgrounds of the two countries and the distinctive developments of their Buddhist traditions. By comparing the precept revival movements in both countries, this study examines how different precept traditions influenced the identity of East Asian Buddhism in the early modern period and how these efforts have been fundamental in maintaining Buddhist orthodoxy into the modern era.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/16/4/492early modern period Buddhismbhikṣu lineageshōbō-ritsuTaeŭnPaekp’aJiun
spellingShingle Jarang Lee
The Inheritance of the Precept Tradition in 18th- and 19th-Century East Asian Buddhism and the Prelude to Modernity: Comparing the Korean and Japanese Precept Revival Movements
Religions
early modern period Buddhism
bhikṣu lineage
shōbō-ritsu
Taeŭn
Paekp’a
Jiun
title The Inheritance of the Precept Tradition in 18th- and 19th-Century East Asian Buddhism and the Prelude to Modernity: Comparing the Korean and Japanese Precept Revival Movements
title_full The Inheritance of the Precept Tradition in 18th- and 19th-Century East Asian Buddhism and the Prelude to Modernity: Comparing the Korean and Japanese Precept Revival Movements
title_fullStr The Inheritance of the Precept Tradition in 18th- and 19th-Century East Asian Buddhism and the Prelude to Modernity: Comparing the Korean and Japanese Precept Revival Movements
title_full_unstemmed The Inheritance of the Precept Tradition in 18th- and 19th-Century East Asian Buddhism and the Prelude to Modernity: Comparing the Korean and Japanese Precept Revival Movements
title_short The Inheritance of the Precept Tradition in 18th- and 19th-Century East Asian Buddhism and the Prelude to Modernity: Comparing the Korean and Japanese Precept Revival Movements
title_sort inheritance of the precept tradition in 18th and 19th century east asian buddhism and the prelude to modernity comparing the korean and japanese precept revival movements
topic early modern period Buddhism
bhikṣu lineage
shōbō-ritsu
Taeŭn
Paekp’a
Jiun
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/16/4/492
work_keys_str_mv AT jaranglee theinheritanceoftheprecepttraditionin18thand19thcenturyeastasianbuddhismandthepreludetomodernitycomparingthekoreanandjapanesepreceptrevivalmovements
AT jaranglee inheritanceoftheprecepttraditionin18thand19thcenturyeastasianbuddhismandthepreludetomodernitycomparingthekoreanandjapanesepreceptrevivalmovements