Rehabilitating Transcendental Arguments: A Dialectical Dilemma for Stroud’s Meta-Epistemological Skepticism
The aim of this paper is to shake up the consensus view on transcendental arguments (TAs) that the ambitious “world-directed” kind fails and that only moderate, “belief-directed” transcendental arguments have a claim to validity. This consensus is based on Barry Stroud’s famous substitution objectio...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Simon Schüz |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Michigan Publishing
2023-11-01
|
| Series: | Ergo, An Open Access Journal of Philosophy |
| Online Access: | https://journals.publishing.umich.edu/ergo/article/id/4652/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Empathy, not Truth: Can a Dialectical and Skeptical Argumentation Enhance Both Democracy and Human Rights Courts?
by: Alberto Puppo
Published: (2018-08-01) -
Empathy, Not Truth: Can a Dialectical and Skeptical Argumentation Enhance Both Democracy and Human Rights Courts?
by: Alberto Puppo
Published: (2018-11-01) -
Skepticism and Virtue Epistemology: Wittgenstein and Sosa
by: Michael Willliams
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Skepticism and Davidson's Omniscient Interpreter Argument
by: Andrew Ward
Published: (2018-12-01) -
From the Buddhist Transcendental Epistemology to Viewing the Limitations of AI and a Recognition of Ontology
by: Xiaoyong Wang, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01)