Human–African buffalo conflict: perceptions of damage, and mitigation strategies, in villages bordering Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania
Human–wildlife conflict is a critical and complex challenge in wildlife conservation. It arises when humans and wildlife interact and one or both parties suffer negative consequences from the interaction. This research assessed the extent of damage resulting from human–African buffalo Syncerus caffe...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Oryx |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0030605324000784/type/journal_article |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850276806536462336 |
|---|---|
| author | Kwaslema Malle Hariohay Ebenezer B. Marandu Emmanuel H. Lyimo Elibariki S. Bajuta |
| author_facet | Kwaslema Malle Hariohay Ebenezer B. Marandu Emmanuel H. Lyimo Elibariki S. Bajuta |
| author_sort | Kwaslema Malle Hariohay |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Human–wildlife conflict is a critical and complex challenge in wildlife conservation. It arises when humans and wildlife interact and one or both parties suffer negative consequences from the interaction. This research assessed the extent of damage resulting from human–African buffalo Syncerus caffer conflict and explored mitigation strategies. We used a semi-structured questionnaire-based survey of 131 households randomly selected in Kambi ya Simba, Oldeani and Tloma villages surrounding Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania. Our results revealed that resource competition was the main factor inducing human–African buffalo conflict. The impacts reported most frequently were crop damage (especially during the wet seasons) and human casualties. Crops that were most often damaged included maize, beans, wheat, peas and coffee. To minimize buffalo crop depredation, farmers currently use traditional mitigation approaches such as guarding farms, lighting fires, using torchlight and vocal and other auditory deterrents. In addition, a local coffee estate installed electrified fencing around its plantation. Our findings demonstrate the impacts of human–African buffalo conflict on local communities and the importance of continuing human–African buffalo conflict monitoring to improve conservation action and increase the participation of the local community in conservation activities. To minimize human–African buffalo conflict, we recommend conservation strategies that improve the natural habitat of the African buffalo. Most importantly, providing communities affected by human–African buffalo conflict with modern and more effective mitigation methods, paired with increased community awareness of the use of these methods, could result in significant reductions in the human cost of human–African buffalo conflict. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-2487be54cd57478ea90ebc3813a67e20 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 0030-6053 1365-3008 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Oryx |
| spelling | doaj-art-2487be54cd57478ea90ebc3813a67e202025-08-20T01:50:07ZengCambridge University PressOryx0030-60531365-30082025-01-015910110810.1017/S0030605324000784Human–African buffalo conflict: perceptions of damage, and mitigation strategies, in villages bordering Ngorongoro Conservation Area, TanzaniaKwaslema Malle Hariohay0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0372-6985Ebenezer B. Marandu1Emmanuel H. Lyimo2Elibariki S. Bajuta3College of African Wildlife Management, Mweka, Moshi, Kilimanjaro, TanzaniaCollege of African Wildlife Management, Mweka, Moshi, Kilimanjaro, TanzaniaCollege of African Wildlife Management, Mweka, Moshi, Kilimanjaro, TanzaniaNgorongoro Conservation Area Authority, Ngorongoro, Arusha, TanzaniaHuman–wildlife conflict is a critical and complex challenge in wildlife conservation. It arises when humans and wildlife interact and one or both parties suffer negative consequences from the interaction. This research assessed the extent of damage resulting from human–African buffalo Syncerus caffer conflict and explored mitigation strategies. We used a semi-structured questionnaire-based survey of 131 households randomly selected in Kambi ya Simba, Oldeani and Tloma villages surrounding Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania. Our results revealed that resource competition was the main factor inducing human–African buffalo conflict. The impacts reported most frequently were crop damage (especially during the wet seasons) and human casualties. Crops that were most often damaged included maize, beans, wheat, peas and coffee. To minimize buffalo crop depredation, farmers currently use traditional mitigation approaches such as guarding farms, lighting fires, using torchlight and vocal and other auditory deterrents. In addition, a local coffee estate installed electrified fencing around its plantation. Our findings demonstrate the impacts of human–African buffalo conflict on local communities and the importance of continuing human–African buffalo conflict monitoring to improve conservation action and increase the participation of the local community in conservation activities. To minimize human–African buffalo conflict, we recommend conservation strategies that improve the natural habitat of the African buffalo. Most importantly, providing communities affected by human–African buffalo conflict with modern and more effective mitigation methods, paired with increased community awareness of the use of these methods, could result in significant reductions in the human cost of human–African buffalo conflict.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0030605324000784/type/journal_articleAfrican buffalocrop damagecrop raidinghuman–buffalo conflictNgorongoro Conservation AreaSyncerus cafferTanzania |
| spellingShingle | Kwaslema Malle Hariohay Ebenezer B. Marandu Emmanuel H. Lyimo Elibariki S. Bajuta Human–African buffalo conflict: perceptions of damage, and mitigation strategies, in villages bordering Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania Oryx African buffalo crop damage crop raiding human–buffalo conflict Ngorongoro Conservation Area Syncerus caffer Tanzania |
| title | Human–African buffalo conflict: perceptions of damage, and mitigation strategies, in villages bordering Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania |
| title_full | Human–African buffalo conflict: perceptions of damage, and mitigation strategies, in villages bordering Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania |
| title_fullStr | Human–African buffalo conflict: perceptions of damage, and mitigation strategies, in villages bordering Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania |
| title_full_unstemmed | Human–African buffalo conflict: perceptions of damage, and mitigation strategies, in villages bordering Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania |
| title_short | Human–African buffalo conflict: perceptions of damage, and mitigation strategies, in villages bordering Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania |
| title_sort | human african buffalo conflict perceptions of damage and mitigation strategies in villages bordering ngorongoro conservation area tanzania |
| topic | African buffalo crop damage crop raiding human–buffalo conflict Ngorongoro Conservation Area Syncerus caffer Tanzania |
| url | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0030605324000784/type/journal_article |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kwaslemamallehariohay humanafricanbuffaloconflictperceptionsofdamageandmitigationstrategiesinvillagesborderingngorongoroconservationareatanzania AT ebenezerbmarandu humanafricanbuffaloconflictperceptionsofdamageandmitigationstrategiesinvillagesborderingngorongoroconservationareatanzania AT emmanuelhlyimo humanafricanbuffaloconflictperceptionsofdamageandmitigationstrategiesinvillagesborderingngorongoroconservationareatanzania AT elibarikisbajuta humanafricanbuffaloconflictperceptionsofdamageandmitigationstrategiesinvillagesborderingngorongoroconservationareatanzania |