Medications to reduce breast cancer risk: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract Background Given the rising incidence of breast cancer, especially in premenopausal women, there is an urgent need to identify additional risk-reducing medications to accelerate prevention, as only a few are currently approved. We, therefore, performed network meta-analysis (NMA) to identif...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ghazaleh Pourali, Minglu Liu, Supriya S. Sherpa, Angela Hardi, Chongliang Luo, Adetunji T. Toriola
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-07-01
Series:Breast Cancer Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-025-02059-w
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849333924829855744
author Ghazaleh Pourali
Minglu Liu
Supriya S. Sherpa
Angela Hardi
Chongliang Luo
Adetunji T. Toriola
author_facet Ghazaleh Pourali
Minglu Liu
Supriya S. Sherpa
Angela Hardi
Chongliang Luo
Adetunji T. Toriola
author_sort Ghazaleh Pourali
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Given the rising incidence of breast cancer, especially in premenopausal women, there is an urgent need to identify additional risk-reducing medications to accelerate prevention, as only a few are currently approved. We, therefore, performed network meta-analysis (NMA) to identify and compare the efficacy of medications for primary breast cancer prevention. Methods We performed a literature search completed on November 16, 2023, in Embase, Ovid-Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating risk-reducing medications in women without a history of invasive breast cancer. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data based on predefined criteria, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, and assessed the risk of bias using the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. The primary outcome was overall breast cancer incidence, with secondary outcomes including invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ. NMA was performed using a random-effects model, measuring efficacy with risk ratios (RR) and number needed to treat (NNT). Medications were ranked using the Surface Under the Cumulative RAnking curve (SUCRA). We performed subgroup analyses by menopause status, primary versus secondary/other outcomes, follow-up, and intervention duration. Results Out of 8,598 studies screened, 43 RCTs (n = 337,240 women) met inclusion criteria. Six medications reduced overall breast cancer risk compared to placebo: sulfonylurea (RR = 0.18, 95% CI = 0.04–0.91, NNT = 44.1, SUCRA = 0.90), thiazolidinediones (RR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.08–0.78, NNT = 48.3, SUCRA = 0.80), third-generation selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) (RR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.33–0.66, NNT = 67.3, SUCRA = 0.62), aromatase inhibitors (AIs) (RR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.39–0.66, NNT = 73.0, SUCRA = 0.55), raloxifene (RR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.47–0.84, NNT = 96.9, SUCRA = 0.37), and tamoxifen (RR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.65–0.88, NNT = 149.7, SUCRA = 0.23). AIs (RR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.33–0.71), tamoxifen (RR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.51–0.78), and raloxifene (RR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.47–0.86), were effective for invasive breast cancer. Third-generation SERMs (RR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.32–0.67), AIs (RR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.40–0.64), raloxifene (RR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.46–0.82), and tamoxifen (RR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.66–0.86) were effective in studies with breast cancer as a primary outcome, while thiazolidinediones (RR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.07–0.84) were effective in studies with breast cancer as a secondary/other outcome. Conclusions This NMA confirms the efficacy of tamoxifen, raloxifene, and AIs, and identifies thiazolidinediones and third-generation SERMs as promising agents for breast cancer prevention, though not currently included in guidelines. These findings extend prior evidence and highlight the need for trials in premenopausal and racially diverse populations to address existing gaps.
format Article
id doaj-art-2465faf9b0424509ba98d0a39daf59cd
institution Kabale University
issn 1465-542X
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Breast Cancer Research
spelling doaj-art-2465faf9b0424509ba98d0a39daf59cd2025-08-20T03:45:43ZengBMCBreast Cancer Research1465-542X2025-07-0127111610.1186/s13058-025-02059-wMedications to reduce breast cancer risk: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsGhazaleh Pourali0Minglu Liu1Supriya S. Sherpa2Angela Hardi3Chongliang Luo4Adetunji T. Toriola5Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of MedicineDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of MedicineDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of MedicineBernard Becker Medical Library, Washington University School of MedicineDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of MedicineDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of MedicineAbstract Background Given the rising incidence of breast cancer, especially in premenopausal women, there is an urgent need to identify additional risk-reducing medications to accelerate prevention, as only a few are currently approved. We, therefore, performed network meta-analysis (NMA) to identify and compare the efficacy of medications for primary breast cancer prevention. Methods We performed a literature search completed on November 16, 2023, in Embase, Ovid-Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating risk-reducing medications in women without a history of invasive breast cancer. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data based on predefined criteria, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, and assessed the risk of bias using the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. The primary outcome was overall breast cancer incidence, with secondary outcomes including invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ. NMA was performed using a random-effects model, measuring efficacy with risk ratios (RR) and number needed to treat (NNT). Medications were ranked using the Surface Under the Cumulative RAnking curve (SUCRA). We performed subgroup analyses by menopause status, primary versus secondary/other outcomes, follow-up, and intervention duration. Results Out of 8,598 studies screened, 43 RCTs (n = 337,240 women) met inclusion criteria. Six medications reduced overall breast cancer risk compared to placebo: sulfonylurea (RR = 0.18, 95% CI = 0.04–0.91, NNT = 44.1, SUCRA = 0.90), thiazolidinediones (RR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.08–0.78, NNT = 48.3, SUCRA = 0.80), third-generation selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) (RR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.33–0.66, NNT = 67.3, SUCRA = 0.62), aromatase inhibitors (AIs) (RR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.39–0.66, NNT = 73.0, SUCRA = 0.55), raloxifene (RR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.47–0.84, NNT = 96.9, SUCRA = 0.37), and tamoxifen (RR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.65–0.88, NNT = 149.7, SUCRA = 0.23). AIs (RR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.33–0.71), tamoxifen (RR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.51–0.78), and raloxifene (RR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.47–0.86), were effective for invasive breast cancer. Third-generation SERMs (RR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.32–0.67), AIs (RR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.40–0.64), raloxifene (RR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.46–0.82), and tamoxifen (RR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.66–0.86) were effective in studies with breast cancer as a primary outcome, while thiazolidinediones (RR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.07–0.84) were effective in studies with breast cancer as a secondary/other outcome. Conclusions This NMA confirms the efficacy of tamoxifen, raloxifene, and AIs, and identifies thiazolidinediones and third-generation SERMs as promising agents for breast cancer prevention, though not currently included in guidelines. These findings extend prior evidence and highlight the need for trials in premenopausal and racially diverse populations to address existing gaps.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-025-02059-wRisk-reducing medicationsBreast cancerSelective estrogen receptor modulatorsAromatase inhibitorsNetwork meta-analysisTamoxifen
spellingShingle Ghazaleh Pourali
Minglu Liu
Supriya S. Sherpa
Angela Hardi
Chongliang Luo
Adetunji T. Toriola
Medications to reduce breast cancer risk: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Breast Cancer Research
Risk-reducing medications
Breast cancer
Selective estrogen receptor modulators
Aromatase inhibitors
Network meta-analysis
Tamoxifen
title Medications to reduce breast cancer risk: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Medications to reduce breast cancer risk: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Medications to reduce breast cancer risk: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Medications to reduce breast cancer risk: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Medications to reduce breast cancer risk: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort medications to reduce breast cancer risk a network meta analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Risk-reducing medications
Breast cancer
Selective estrogen receptor modulators
Aromatase inhibitors
Network meta-analysis
Tamoxifen
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-025-02059-w
work_keys_str_mv AT ghazalehpourali medicationstoreducebreastcancerriskanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT mingluliu medicationstoreducebreastcancerriskanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT supriyassherpa medicationstoreducebreastcancerriskanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT angelahardi medicationstoreducebreastcancerriskanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT chongliangluo medicationstoreducebreastcancerriskanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT adetunjittoriola medicationstoreducebreastcancerriskanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials