The Reception of Cicero’s contiones in the 20th and Early 21st Centuries

The paper explores the different approaches taken by 20th and 21st century scholars to Cicero’s extant political speeches before the Roman people (contiones). These speeches offer a resource for Cicero’s views on the role of this political body in the Roman res publica of his time. This study focuse...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Panagiotes Kontonasios
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Università degli Studi di Torino 2019-07-01
Series:Ciceroniana On Line
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ojs.unito.it/index.php/COL/article/view/3524
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849417009642602496
author Panagiotes Kontonasios
author_facet Panagiotes Kontonasios
author_sort Panagiotes Kontonasios
collection DOAJ
description The paper explores the different approaches taken by 20th and 21st century scholars to Cicero’s extant political speeches before the Roman people (contiones). These speeches offer a resource for Cicero’s views on the role of this political body in the Roman res publica of his time. This study focuses on accounting for the reasons for those differences and how these readings of the contiones underpin diverse portraits of Cicero as an orator and politician. This bibliographic review of contrasting interpretations of the body of contiones helps shed light on why different generations of Cicero scholars and historians of the Roman Republic have judged Cicero as a “consistent” or “inconsistent” orator and politician. This focused bibliographic evaluation leads to a more rounded understanding of Cicero’s personality as portrayed in recent scholarly history and the dimensions this personality has taken on over the period.  L’article étudie les approches opposées adoptées par les chercheurs du 20e siècle et du début du 21e siècle, quant aux discours politiques de Cicéron devant le peuples romain (contiones). Ils contiennent les vues de Cicéron sur le rôle de ce corps politique dans la res publica de son temps. Je me concentre sur les raisons mêmes de ces différences et sur la description de Cicéron en tant qu’orateur et homme politique. L’étude bibliographique que j’offre pour les points de vue contrastés clarifie les facteurs qui ont contribué à ces points de vue et éclairent la question de la cohérence ou de l’incohérence de Cicéron en tant qu’orateur et homme politique romain. Tout cela nous mène finalement à une meilleure compréhension de la personnalité de Cicéron et de ses divers impacts dans diverses circonstances historiques.
format Article
id doaj-art-2401c034163f4c3e9159100e08269baf
institution Kabale University
issn 2532-5299
2532-5353
language deu
publishDate 2019-07-01
publisher Università degli Studi di Torino
record_format Article
series Ciceroniana On Line
spelling doaj-art-2401c034163f4c3e9159100e08269baf2025-08-20T03:32:58ZdeuUniversità degli Studi di TorinoCiceroniana On Line2532-52992532-53532019-07-013110.13135/2532-5353/3524The Reception of Cicero’s contiones in the 20th and Early 21st CenturiesPanagiotes Kontonasios0University of Ioannina, GreeceThe paper explores the different approaches taken by 20th and 21st century scholars to Cicero’s extant political speeches before the Roman people (contiones). These speeches offer a resource for Cicero’s views on the role of this political body in the Roman res publica of his time. This study focuses on accounting for the reasons for those differences and how these readings of the contiones underpin diverse portraits of Cicero as an orator and politician. This bibliographic review of contrasting interpretations of the body of contiones helps shed light on why different generations of Cicero scholars and historians of the Roman Republic have judged Cicero as a “consistent” or “inconsistent” orator and politician. This focused bibliographic evaluation leads to a more rounded understanding of Cicero’s personality as portrayed in recent scholarly history and the dimensions this personality has taken on over the period.  L’article étudie les approches opposées adoptées par les chercheurs du 20e siècle et du début du 21e siècle, quant aux discours politiques de Cicéron devant le peuples romain (contiones). Ils contiennent les vues de Cicéron sur le rôle de ce corps politique dans la res publica de son temps. Je me concentre sur les raisons mêmes de ces différences et sur la description de Cicéron en tant qu’orateur et homme politique. L’étude bibliographique que j’offre pour les points de vue contrastés clarifie les facteurs qui ont contribué à ces points de vue et éclairent la question de la cohérence ou de l’incohérence de Cicéron en tant qu’orateur et homme politique romain. Tout cela nous mène finalement à une meilleure compréhension de la personnalité de Cicéron et de ses divers impacts dans diverses circonstances historiques.https://www.ojs.unito.it/index.php/COL/article/view/3524Cicerocontionesres publica20th centuryearly 21st century
spellingShingle Panagiotes Kontonasios
The Reception of Cicero’s contiones in the 20th and Early 21st Centuries
Ciceroniana On Line
Cicero
contiones
res publica
20th century
early 21st century
title The Reception of Cicero’s contiones in the 20th and Early 21st Centuries
title_full The Reception of Cicero’s contiones in the 20th and Early 21st Centuries
title_fullStr The Reception of Cicero’s contiones in the 20th and Early 21st Centuries
title_full_unstemmed The Reception of Cicero’s contiones in the 20th and Early 21st Centuries
title_short The Reception of Cicero’s contiones in the 20th and Early 21st Centuries
title_sort reception of cicero s contiones in the 20th and early 21st centuries
topic Cicero
contiones
res publica
20th century
early 21st century
url https://www.ojs.unito.it/index.php/COL/article/view/3524
work_keys_str_mv AT panagioteskontonasios thereceptionofciceroscontionesinthe20thandearly21stcenturies
AT panagioteskontonasios receptionofciceroscontionesinthe20thandearly21stcenturies