Mycoplankton in river-lake water systems with different pollution. Do lakes act as traps for river mycoplankton?

The aim of the study was to determine the abundance and species diversity of mycoplankton in lotic and lentic waters within the Rospuda river-lake system. Additionally, it aimed to explain the influence of lake waters on the abundance and species diversity of mycoplankton in the riverine sections of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anna Pietryczuk, Jakub Korpacz, Magdalena Świsłocka, Agata Jabłońska-Trypuć, Adam Więcko, Izabela Dobrzyńska, Józefa Wiater, Adam Cudowski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-04-01
Series:Desalination and Water Treatment
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1944398625001857
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849734183338901504
author Anna Pietryczuk
Jakub Korpacz
Magdalena Świsłocka
Agata Jabłońska-Trypuć
Adam Więcko
Izabela Dobrzyńska
Józefa Wiater
Adam Cudowski
author_facet Anna Pietryczuk
Jakub Korpacz
Magdalena Świsłocka
Agata Jabłońska-Trypuć
Adam Więcko
Izabela Dobrzyńska
Józefa Wiater
Adam Cudowski
author_sort Anna Pietryczuk
collection DOAJ
description The aim of the study was to determine the abundance and species diversity of mycoplankton in lotic and lentic waters within the Rospuda river-lake system. Additionally, it aimed to explain the influence of lake waters on the abundance and species diversity of mycoplankton in the riverine sections of the river-lake system. Water samples were collected using a Limnosa sampler during the summer seasons from 2019 to 2023 from surface layers of the entire Rospuda river-lake system, which has a total length of 102 km. Sampling included 10 lakes, of which four are mesotrophic, five are eutrophic, and one is at the boundary between mesotrophy and eutrophy, as well as 11 samples from the riverine sections of the studied system. The mycoplankton abundance in the studied system ranged from 8400 to 16,400 CFU/mL, with the lowest values found in limnic waters and the highest in riverine sections. The lakes Okrągłe, Bolesty, Sumowo, and Rospuda Augustowska, which are eutrophic, exhibited the lowest species diversity of mycoplankton. The highest species diversity was observed in the river sections connecting Długie and Garbaś Lakes (Rospuda River 4) and Głębokie and Sumowo Lakes (Rospuda River 6), with 8 and 7 fungal species in the water column, respectively. The most frequently occurring fungal species in the studied system were Penicillium chrysogenum and Penicillium commune, with as much as 43 % of the identified aquatic fungi being potential pathogens, representing mycological micro-contaminants of the water.The results indicate that aquatic fungi can be valuable indicators of pollution levels and the sanitary quality of waters. This study demonstrated that the species diversity and abundance of fungi in lentic waters primarily depend on the concentration of organic matter, phytoplankton biomass indicated by chlorophyll a concentration, and the degree of water pollution. Furthermore, mesotrophic lakes contributed to an increase in mycoplankton abundance in the riverine sections, while eutrophic lakes caused a decrease in the abundance of these microorganisms in flowing waters. Therefore, it can be conclusively stated that eutrophic lakes act as traps for river mycoplankton, whereas mesotrophic lakes are sources of aquatic fungi in rivers.
format Article
id doaj-art-23cb5ceaa3334407a9529de4c5a6ea13
institution DOAJ
issn 1944-3986
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Desalination and Water Treatment
spelling doaj-art-23cb5ceaa3334407a9529de4c5a6ea132025-08-20T03:07:51ZengElsevierDesalination and Water Treatment1944-39862025-04-0132210116910.1016/j.dwt.2025.101169Mycoplankton in river-lake water systems with different pollution. Do lakes act as traps for river mycoplankton?Anna Pietryczuk0Jakub Korpacz1Magdalena Świsłocka2Agata Jabłońska-Trypuć3Adam Więcko4Izabela Dobrzyńska5Józefa Wiater6Adam Cudowski7University of Białystok, Faculty of Biology, Department of Hydrobiology, Ciołkowskiego 1J Street, Białystok 15-245, PolandUniversity of Białystok, Faculty of Biology, Department of Hydrobiology, Ciołkowskiego 1J Street, Białystok 15-245, PolandUniversity of Białystok, Faculty of Biology, Department of Zoology and Genetics, Ciołkowskiego 1J Street, Białystok 15-245, PolandUniversity of Technology of Białystok, Department of Chemistry, Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Wiejska 45E Street, Białystok 15-351, PolandUniversity of Białystok, Faculty of Biology, Department of Hydrobiology, Ciołkowskiego 1J Street, Białystok 15-245, PolandUniversity of Białystok, Faculty of Chemistry, Department of Physical Chemistry, Ciołkowskiego 1K Street, Białystok 15-245, PolandUniversity of Technology of Białystok, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Department of Agri-Food Engineering and Environmental Management, Wiejska 45E Street, Białystok 15-351, PolandUniversity of Białystok, Faculty of Biology, Department of Hydrobiology, Ciołkowskiego 1J Street, Białystok 15-245, Poland; Corresponding author.The aim of the study was to determine the abundance and species diversity of mycoplankton in lotic and lentic waters within the Rospuda river-lake system. Additionally, it aimed to explain the influence of lake waters on the abundance and species diversity of mycoplankton in the riverine sections of the river-lake system. Water samples were collected using a Limnosa sampler during the summer seasons from 2019 to 2023 from surface layers of the entire Rospuda river-lake system, which has a total length of 102 km. Sampling included 10 lakes, of which four are mesotrophic, five are eutrophic, and one is at the boundary between mesotrophy and eutrophy, as well as 11 samples from the riverine sections of the studied system. The mycoplankton abundance in the studied system ranged from 8400 to 16,400 CFU/mL, with the lowest values found in limnic waters and the highest in riverine sections. The lakes Okrągłe, Bolesty, Sumowo, and Rospuda Augustowska, which are eutrophic, exhibited the lowest species diversity of mycoplankton. The highest species diversity was observed in the river sections connecting Długie and Garbaś Lakes (Rospuda River 4) and Głębokie and Sumowo Lakes (Rospuda River 6), with 8 and 7 fungal species in the water column, respectively. The most frequently occurring fungal species in the studied system were Penicillium chrysogenum and Penicillium commune, with as much as 43 % of the identified aquatic fungi being potential pathogens, representing mycological micro-contaminants of the water.The results indicate that aquatic fungi can be valuable indicators of pollution levels and the sanitary quality of waters. This study demonstrated that the species diversity and abundance of fungi in lentic waters primarily depend on the concentration of organic matter, phytoplankton biomass indicated by chlorophyll a concentration, and the degree of water pollution. Furthermore, mesotrophic lakes contributed to an increase in mycoplankton abundance in the riverine sections, while eutrophic lakes caused a decrease in the abundance of these microorganisms in flowing waters. Therefore, it can be conclusively stated that eutrophic lakes act as traps for river mycoplankton, whereas mesotrophic lakes are sources of aquatic fungi in rivers.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1944398625001857MycoplanktonRiver-lake systemRiverMezotrophic lakesEutrophic lakesEcological status
spellingShingle Anna Pietryczuk
Jakub Korpacz
Magdalena Świsłocka
Agata Jabłońska-Trypuć
Adam Więcko
Izabela Dobrzyńska
Józefa Wiater
Adam Cudowski
Mycoplankton in river-lake water systems with different pollution. Do lakes act as traps for river mycoplankton?
Desalination and Water Treatment
Mycoplankton
River-lake system
River
Mezotrophic lakes
Eutrophic lakes
Ecological status
title Mycoplankton in river-lake water systems with different pollution. Do lakes act as traps for river mycoplankton?
title_full Mycoplankton in river-lake water systems with different pollution. Do lakes act as traps for river mycoplankton?
title_fullStr Mycoplankton in river-lake water systems with different pollution. Do lakes act as traps for river mycoplankton?
title_full_unstemmed Mycoplankton in river-lake water systems with different pollution. Do lakes act as traps for river mycoplankton?
title_short Mycoplankton in river-lake water systems with different pollution. Do lakes act as traps for river mycoplankton?
title_sort mycoplankton in river lake water systems with different pollution do lakes act as traps for river mycoplankton
topic Mycoplankton
River-lake system
River
Mezotrophic lakes
Eutrophic lakes
Ecological status
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1944398625001857
work_keys_str_mv AT annapietryczuk mycoplanktoninriverlakewatersystemswithdifferentpollutiondolakesactastrapsforrivermycoplankton
AT jakubkorpacz mycoplanktoninriverlakewatersystemswithdifferentpollutiondolakesactastrapsforrivermycoplankton
AT magdalenaswisłocka mycoplanktoninriverlakewatersystemswithdifferentpollutiondolakesactastrapsforrivermycoplankton
AT agatajabłonskatrypuc mycoplanktoninriverlakewatersystemswithdifferentpollutiondolakesactastrapsforrivermycoplankton
AT adamwiecko mycoplanktoninriverlakewatersystemswithdifferentpollutiondolakesactastrapsforrivermycoplankton
AT izabeladobrzynska mycoplanktoninriverlakewatersystemswithdifferentpollutiondolakesactastrapsforrivermycoplankton
AT jozefawiater mycoplanktoninriverlakewatersystemswithdifferentpollutiondolakesactastrapsforrivermycoplankton
AT adamcudowski mycoplanktoninriverlakewatersystemswithdifferentpollutiondolakesactastrapsforrivermycoplankton