Impact of different training modalities on anthropometric and metabolic characteristics in overweight/obese subjects: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

<h4>Background</h4>The aim of this systematic review of randomized controlled trials was to compare the effects of aerobic training (AET), resistance training (RT), and combined aerobic and resistance training (CT) on anthropometric parameters, blood lipids, and cardiorespiratory fitness...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lukas Schwingshackl, Sofia Dias, Barbara Strasser, Georg Hoffmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082853
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849320794047381504
author Lukas Schwingshackl
Sofia Dias
Barbara Strasser
Georg Hoffmann
author_facet Lukas Schwingshackl
Sofia Dias
Barbara Strasser
Georg Hoffmann
author_sort Lukas Schwingshackl
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>The aim of this systematic review of randomized controlled trials was to compare the effects of aerobic training (AET), resistance training (RT), and combined aerobic and resistance training (CT) on anthropometric parameters, blood lipids, and cardiorespiratory fitness in overweight and obese subjects.<h4>Methods</h4>Electronic searches for randomized controlled trials were performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Trial Register. Inclusion criteria were: Body Mass Index: ≥25 kg/m(2), 19+ years of age, supervised exercise training, and a minimum intervention period of 8 weeks. Anthropometric outcomes, blood lipids, and cardiorespiratory fitness parameters were included. Pooled effects were calculated by inverse-variance random effect pairwise meta-analyses and Bayesian random effects network meta-analyses.<h4>Findings</h4>15 trials enrolling 741 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to RT, AET resulted in a significantly more pronounced reduction of body weight [mean differences (MD): -1.15 kg, p = 0.04], waist circumference [MD: -1.10 cm, p = 0.004], and fat mass [MD: -1.15 kg, p = 0.001] respectively. RT was more effective than AET in improving lean body mass [MD: 1.26 kg, p<0.00001]. When comparing CT with RT, MD in change of body weight [MD: -2.03 kg, p<0.0001], waist circumference [MD: -1.57 cm, p = 0.0002], and fat mass [MD: -1.88 kg, p<0.00001] were all in favor of CT. Results from the network meta-analyses confirmed these findings.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Evidence from both pairwise and network meta-analyses suggests that CT is the most efficacious means to reduce anthropometric outcomes and should be recommended in the prevention and treatment of overweight, and obesity whenever possible.
format Article
id doaj-art-2374e51579d94a9eb9d3fe77b8171e1a
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-2374e51579d94a9eb9d3fe77b8171e1a2025-08-20T03:49:59ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-01812e8285310.1371/journal.pone.0082853Impact of different training modalities on anthropometric and metabolic characteristics in overweight/obese subjects: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Lukas SchwingshacklSofia DiasBarbara StrasserGeorg Hoffmann<h4>Background</h4>The aim of this systematic review of randomized controlled trials was to compare the effects of aerobic training (AET), resistance training (RT), and combined aerobic and resistance training (CT) on anthropometric parameters, blood lipids, and cardiorespiratory fitness in overweight and obese subjects.<h4>Methods</h4>Electronic searches for randomized controlled trials were performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Trial Register. Inclusion criteria were: Body Mass Index: ≥25 kg/m(2), 19+ years of age, supervised exercise training, and a minimum intervention period of 8 weeks. Anthropometric outcomes, blood lipids, and cardiorespiratory fitness parameters were included. Pooled effects were calculated by inverse-variance random effect pairwise meta-analyses and Bayesian random effects network meta-analyses.<h4>Findings</h4>15 trials enrolling 741 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to RT, AET resulted in a significantly more pronounced reduction of body weight [mean differences (MD): -1.15 kg, p = 0.04], waist circumference [MD: -1.10 cm, p = 0.004], and fat mass [MD: -1.15 kg, p = 0.001] respectively. RT was more effective than AET in improving lean body mass [MD: 1.26 kg, p<0.00001]. When comparing CT with RT, MD in change of body weight [MD: -2.03 kg, p<0.0001], waist circumference [MD: -1.57 cm, p = 0.0002], and fat mass [MD: -1.88 kg, p<0.00001] were all in favor of CT. Results from the network meta-analyses confirmed these findings.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Evidence from both pairwise and network meta-analyses suggests that CT is the most efficacious means to reduce anthropometric outcomes and should be recommended in the prevention and treatment of overweight, and obesity whenever possible.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082853
spellingShingle Lukas Schwingshackl
Sofia Dias
Barbara Strasser
Georg Hoffmann
Impact of different training modalities on anthropometric and metabolic characteristics in overweight/obese subjects: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
PLoS ONE
title Impact of different training modalities on anthropometric and metabolic characteristics in overweight/obese subjects: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
title_full Impact of different training modalities on anthropometric and metabolic characteristics in overweight/obese subjects: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
title_fullStr Impact of different training modalities on anthropometric and metabolic characteristics in overweight/obese subjects: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Impact of different training modalities on anthropometric and metabolic characteristics in overweight/obese subjects: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
title_short Impact of different training modalities on anthropometric and metabolic characteristics in overweight/obese subjects: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
title_sort impact of different training modalities on anthropometric and metabolic characteristics in overweight obese subjects a systematic review and network meta analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082853
work_keys_str_mv AT lukasschwingshackl impactofdifferenttrainingmodalitiesonanthropometricandmetaboliccharacteristicsinoverweightobesesubjectsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT sofiadias impactofdifferenttrainingmodalitiesonanthropometricandmetaboliccharacteristicsinoverweightobesesubjectsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT barbarastrasser impactofdifferenttrainingmodalitiesonanthropometricandmetaboliccharacteristicsinoverweightobesesubjectsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT georghoffmann impactofdifferenttrainingmodalitiesonanthropometricandmetaboliccharacteristicsinoverweightobesesubjectsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis