Studies on Optimization of Fly Ash, GGBS and Precipitated Silica in Geopolymer Concrete
Considering the urgent need for sustainable construction materials, this study investigates the mechanical and microstructural responses of novel hybrid geopolymer concrete blends incorporating Fly Ash (FA), Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBS), Cement (C) and Precipitated Silica (PS) as part...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-04-01
|
| Series: | Construction Materials |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7108/5/2/29 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850156911276589056 |
|---|---|
| author | Anilkumar K S Sreekeshava C Bhargavi |
| author_facet | Anilkumar K S Sreekeshava C Bhargavi |
| author_sort | Anilkumar |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Considering the urgent need for sustainable construction materials, this study investigates the mechanical and microstructural responses of novel hybrid geopolymer concrete blends incorporating Fly Ash (FA), Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBS), Cement (C) and Precipitated Silica (PS) as partial replacements for traditional cementitious materials. The motive lies in reducing CO<sub>2</sub> emissions associated with Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC). The main aim of the study was to optimise the proportions of industrial wastes for enhanced performance and sustainability. The geopolymer mixes were activated using a 10 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH)—Sodium Silicate (Na<sub>2</sub>SiO<sub>3</sub>) solution and cast into cubes (100 mm), cylinders (100 mm × 200 mm) and prism specimens for compressive, split tensile and flexural strength testing, respectively. Six combinations of mixes were studied: FA/C (50:50), GGBS/C (50:50), FA/C/PS (50:40:10), FA/GGBS/PS (50:40:10), GGBS/C (50:50) and GGBS/FA/PS (50:40:10). The results indicated that the blend with 50% FA, 40% GGBS and 10% PS exhibited higher strength. Mixes with GGBS and PS presented a l0 lower slump due to rapid setting and higher water demand, while GGBS-FA-cement mixes indicated better workability. GGBS/C exhibited a 24.6% rise in compressive strength for 7 days, whereas FA/C presented a 31.3% rise at 90 days. GGBS/FA mix indicated a 35.5% strength drop from 28 days to 90 days. SEM and EDS analyses showed that FA-rich mixes had porous microstructures, while GGBS-based mixes formed denser matrices with increased calcium content. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-22d1385bfa724ece82d3dd04d030f3d3 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2673-7108 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-04-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Construction Materials |
| spelling | doaj-art-22d1385bfa724ece82d3dd04d030f3d32025-08-20T02:24:21ZengMDPI AGConstruction Materials2673-71082025-04-01522910.3390/constrmater5020029Studies on Optimization of Fly Ash, GGBS and Precipitated Silica in Geopolymer ConcreteAnilkumar0K S Sreekeshava1C Bhargavi2Department of Civil Engineering, Government Engineering College, Raichur, Affiliated to Visvesvaraya Technological University, Belagavi 590018, IndiaDepartment of Civil Engineering, Jyothy Institute of Technology, Affiliated to Visvesvaraya Technological University, Belagavi 590018, IndiaDepartment of Civil Engineering, Jyothy Institute of Technology, Affiliated to Visvesvaraya Technological University, Belagavi 590018, IndiaConsidering the urgent need for sustainable construction materials, this study investigates the mechanical and microstructural responses of novel hybrid geopolymer concrete blends incorporating Fly Ash (FA), Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBS), Cement (C) and Precipitated Silica (PS) as partial replacements for traditional cementitious materials. The motive lies in reducing CO<sub>2</sub> emissions associated with Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC). The main aim of the study was to optimise the proportions of industrial wastes for enhanced performance and sustainability. The geopolymer mixes were activated using a 10 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH)—Sodium Silicate (Na<sub>2</sub>SiO<sub>3</sub>) solution and cast into cubes (100 mm), cylinders (100 mm × 200 mm) and prism specimens for compressive, split tensile and flexural strength testing, respectively. Six combinations of mixes were studied: FA/C (50:50), GGBS/C (50:50), FA/C/PS (50:40:10), FA/GGBS/PS (50:40:10), GGBS/C (50:50) and GGBS/FA/PS (50:40:10). The results indicated that the blend with 50% FA, 40% GGBS and 10% PS exhibited higher strength. Mixes with GGBS and PS presented a l0 lower slump due to rapid setting and higher water demand, while GGBS-FA-cement mixes indicated better workability. GGBS/C exhibited a 24.6% rise in compressive strength for 7 days, whereas FA/C presented a 31.3% rise at 90 days. GGBS/FA mix indicated a 35.5% strength drop from 28 days to 90 days. SEM and EDS analyses showed that FA-rich mixes had porous microstructures, while GGBS-based mixes formed denser matrices with increased calcium content.https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7108/5/2/29geopolymer concreteGGBSfly-ashprecipitated silicaSEMEDS |
| spellingShingle | Anilkumar K S Sreekeshava C Bhargavi Studies on Optimization of Fly Ash, GGBS and Precipitated Silica in Geopolymer Concrete Construction Materials geopolymer concrete GGBS fly-ash precipitated silica SEM EDS |
| title | Studies on Optimization of Fly Ash, GGBS and Precipitated Silica in Geopolymer Concrete |
| title_full | Studies on Optimization of Fly Ash, GGBS and Precipitated Silica in Geopolymer Concrete |
| title_fullStr | Studies on Optimization of Fly Ash, GGBS and Precipitated Silica in Geopolymer Concrete |
| title_full_unstemmed | Studies on Optimization of Fly Ash, GGBS and Precipitated Silica in Geopolymer Concrete |
| title_short | Studies on Optimization of Fly Ash, GGBS and Precipitated Silica in Geopolymer Concrete |
| title_sort | studies on optimization of fly ash ggbs and precipitated silica in geopolymer concrete |
| topic | geopolymer concrete GGBS fly-ash precipitated silica SEM EDS |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7108/5/2/29 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT anilkumar studiesonoptimizationofflyashggbsandprecipitatedsilicaingeopolymerconcrete AT kssreekeshava studiesonoptimizationofflyashggbsandprecipitatedsilicaingeopolymerconcrete AT cbhargavi studiesonoptimizationofflyashggbsandprecipitatedsilicaingeopolymerconcrete |