Auditory evoked potential wave VI as an objective indicator of sedation depth in neonates undergoing chloral hydrate sedation: a double-blind randomized controlled study

BackgroundNeonatal sedation depth monitoring is critical yet depends on the subjective Ramsay scale when used and lacks objective biomarkers. Although auditory evoked potential (AEP) wave VI disappearance is linked to reduced consciousness, its use for neonatal sedation monitoring remains underexplo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zong Zheng, Shanpu Yang, Hongyan Liu, Zhimin Sheng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Pediatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2025.1629088/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849768324638965760
author Zong Zheng
Shanpu Yang
Hongyan Liu
Zhimin Sheng
author_facet Zong Zheng
Shanpu Yang
Hongyan Liu
Zhimin Sheng
author_sort Zong Zheng
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundNeonatal sedation depth monitoring is critical yet depends on the subjective Ramsay scale when used and lacks objective biomarkers. Although auditory evoked potential (AEP) wave VI disappearance is linked to reduced consciousness, its use for neonatal sedation monitoring remains underexplored. We aimed to determine whether wave VI could function as an objective indicator of sedation levels in neonates.MethodsThis prospective, double-blind, randomized trial enrolled 100 neonates requiring hearing screening. Participants were randomly assigned in a 4:1 ratio to either the treatment group (n = 80; 50 mg/kg oral chloral hydrate) or the control group (n = 20; 0.9% saline placebo). The treatment group was further divided into three subgroups according to Ramsay sedation scores, namely, level 4 (n = 22), level 5 (n = 23), and level 6 (n = 35), while the control group was divided into level 3 (n = 5), level 4 (n = 12), and level 5 (n = 3). All neonates received a standardized AEP test performed by an experienced audiologist. Sedation depth was evaluated using the Ramsay scale, and the latency and disappearance rate of wave VI were recorded and correlated with sedation levels. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the predictive ability of wave VI latency in deep sedation, analyzing its sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values.ResultsIn the treatment group, wave VI disappearance rates increased in a sedation-dependent manner across the Ramsay Sedation Scale: 0% at level 4, 26% at level 5, and 68.6% at level 6 (p < 0.05). No wave VI disappearance was observed in the control group. ROC analysis demonstrated that wave VI latency predicted deep sedation (Ramsay ≥ 5) with an area under the curve of 0.861 (95% confidence interval: 0.746–0.975). The optimal latency cutoff was 8.465 ms (72.7% sensitivity, 86.2% specificity).ConclusionAEP wave VI latency and disappearance are objective, sensitive, and specific indicators of sedation depth in neonates. With further validation, wave VI has the potential to become a reliable neurophysiological tool for precise sedation monitoring in neonates. Clinical Trial Registrationhttps://www.chictr.org.cn/index.html, identifier ChiCTR2300068407.
format Article
id doaj-art-22ab85eabfaa4c15946b91bc82d95b13
institution DOAJ
issn 2296-2360
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Pediatrics
spelling doaj-art-22ab85eabfaa4c15946b91bc82d95b132025-08-20T03:03:50ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pediatrics2296-23602025-08-011310.3389/fped.2025.16290881629088Auditory evoked potential wave VI as an objective indicator of sedation depth in neonates undergoing chloral hydrate sedation: a double-blind randomized controlled studyZong Zheng0Shanpu Yang1Hongyan Liu2Zhimin Sheng3Department of Neonatology, People’s Hospital of Yuhuan City, Taizhou, ChinaDepartment of Neonatology, People’s Hospital of Yuhuan City, Taizhou, ChinaDepartment of Neonatology, People’s Hospital of Yuhuan City, Taizhou, ChinaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wenling Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Taizhou, ChinaBackgroundNeonatal sedation depth monitoring is critical yet depends on the subjective Ramsay scale when used and lacks objective biomarkers. Although auditory evoked potential (AEP) wave VI disappearance is linked to reduced consciousness, its use for neonatal sedation monitoring remains underexplored. We aimed to determine whether wave VI could function as an objective indicator of sedation levels in neonates.MethodsThis prospective, double-blind, randomized trial enrolled 100 neonates requiring hearing screening. Participants were randomly assigned in a 4:1 ratio to either the treatment group (n = 80; 50 mg/kg oral chloral hydrate) or the control group (n = 20; 0.9% saline placebo). The treatment group was further divided into three subgroups according to Ramsay sedation scores, namely, level 4 (n = 22), level 5 (n = 23), and level 6 (n = 35), while the control group was divided into level 3 (n = 5), level 4 (n = 12), and level 5 (n = 3). All neonates received a standardized AEP test performed by an experienced audiologist. Sedation depth was evaluated using the Ramsay scale, and the latency and disappearance rate of wave VI were recorded and correlated with sedation levels. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the predictive ability of wave VI latency in deep sedation, analyzing its sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values.ResultsIn the treatment group, wave VI disappearance rates increased in a sedation-dependent manner across the Ramsay Sedation Scale: 0% at level 4, 26% at level 5, and 68.6% at level 6 (p < 0.05). No wave VI disappearance was observed in the control group. ROC analysis demonstrated that wave VI latency predicted deep sedation (Ramsay ≥ 5) with an area under the curve of 0.861 (95% confidence interval: 0.746–0.975). The optimal latency cutoff was 8.465 ms (72.7% sensitivity, 86.2% specificity).ConclusionAEP wave VI latency and disappearance are objective, sensitive, and specific indicators of sedation depth in neonates. With further validation, wave VI has the potential to become a reliable neurophysiological tool for precise sedation monitoring in neonates. Clinical Trial Registrationhttps://www.chictr.org.cn/index.html, identifier ChiCTR2300068407.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2025.1629088/fullchloral hydrateneonatal sedationauditory evoked potentialswave VIRamsay scale
spellingShingle Zong Zheng
Shanpu Yang
Hongyan Liu
Zhimin Sheng
Auditory evoked potential wave VI as an objective indicator of sedation depth in neonates undergoing chloral hydrate sedation: a double-blind randomized controlled study
Frontiers in Pediatrics
chloral hydrate
neonatal sedation
auditory evoked potentials
wave VI
Ramsay scale
title Auditory evoked potential wave VI as an objective indicator of sedation depth in neonates undergoing chloral hydrate sedation: a double-blind randomized controlled study
title_full Auditory evoked potential wave VI as an objective indicator of sedation depth in neonates undergoing chloral hydrate sedation: a double-blind randomized controlled study
title_fullStr Auditory evoked potential wave VI as an objective indicator of sedation depth in neonates undergoing chloral hydrate sedation: a double-blind randomized controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Auditory evoked potential wave VI as an objective indicator of sedation depth in neonates undergoing chloral hydrate sedation: a double-blind randomized controlled study
title_short Auditory evoked potential wave VI as an objective indicator of sedation depth in neonates undergoing chloral hydrate sedation: a double-blind randomized controlled study
title_sort auditory evoked potential wave vi as an objective indicator of sedation depth in neonates undergoing chloral hydrate sedation a double blind randomized controlled study
topic chloral hydrate
neonatal sedation
auditory evoked potentials
wave VI
Ramsay scale
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2025.1629088/full
work_keys_str_mv AT zongzheng auditoryevokedpotentialwaveviasanobjectiveindicatorofsedationdepthinneonatesundergoingchloralhydratesedationadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT shanpuyang auditoryevokedpotentialwaveviasanobjectiveindicatorofsedationdepthinneonatesundergoingchloralhydratesedationadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT hongyanliu auditoryevokedpotentialwaveviasanobjectiveindicatorofsedationdepthinneonatesundergoingchloralhydratesedationadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT zhiminsheng auditoryevokedpotentialwaveviasanobjectiveindicatorofsedationdepthinneonatesundergoingchloralhydratesedationadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy