Public health impact and cost-effectiveness of introducing MenACWY vaccination strategies in Germany

Abstract Background The invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) routine immunization recommendation in Germany is a meningococcal serogroup C (MenC) conjugate vaccine for toddlers aged 12 months with a catch-up for unimmunized up to 17 years. However, there are no recommendations for routine meningococ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katharina Schley, Sabrina Janßen, Shannon M. Sullivan, Eszter Tichy, Jamie Findlow
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-05-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21491-3
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849729034546577408
author Katharina Schley
Sabrina Janßen
Shannon M. Sullivan
Eszter Tichy
Jamie Findlow
author_facet Katharina Schley
Sabrina Janßen
Shannon M. Sullivan
Eszter Tichy
Jamie Findlow
author_sort Katharina Schley
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) routine immunization recommendation in Germany is a meningococcal serogroup C (MenC) conjugate vaccine for toddlers aged 12 months with a catch-up for unimmunized up to 17 years. However, there are no recommendations for routine meningococcal serogroups A, C, W, Y (MenACWY) vaccination or for adolescent vaccinations; this differs from other European countries. This analysis aimed to understand the benefits of implementing adolescent MenACWY vaccination in Germany. Methods A static population-cohort model evaluating IMD burden and related health outcomes (e.g., cases, cases with long-term sequelae, deaths) was developed to compare any two meningococcal vaccination strategies. We compared hypothetical vaccination strategies that included different approaches to adolescent vaccination in Germany, such as vaccinating at 13-year olds versus 16-year olds and vaccinating with MenC versus MenACWY. Additional strategies considered the benefit that could be provided by switching the current MenC vaccine recommendation in toddlers to MenACWY. Results All strategies that included MenACWY vaccine were effective in decreasing the number of cases, preventing mortality and offered good value for money. The greatest benefit was observed in individuals vaccinated with MenACWY at 12 months and 16 years of age (2,978 IMD cases averted; 563 IMD deaths prevented). Compared with the current strategy of MenC vaccination at 12 months of age, two-dose strategies that included MenACWY reported incremental cost-effectiveness ratios <€13,205 per quality-adjusted life year. Adolescent strategies of MenC or MenACWY vaccine at 16 years old (with no vaccination at 12 months) dominated current vaccination strategies. Adolescent vaccination at 16 years old versus 13 years old offered slightly better value for money. Conclusions With recent increases in IMD cases and outbreaks occurring globally following the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a greater urgency to proactively implement a MenACWY vaccine recommendation to protect adolescents in Germany. This recommendation would provide direct protection to a group at increased risk and offer indirect protection to other population groups. Implementation of a school-based immunization program could increase vaccine uptake and overcome hurdles in adolescent vaccination.
format Article
id doaj-art-227debbf9cf54f50a7ddb3903df0144b
institution DOAJ
issn 1471-2458
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Public Health
spelling doaj-art-227debbf9cf54f50a7ddb3903df0144b2025-08-20T03:09:20ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582025-05-0125111410.1186/s12889-025-21491-3Public health impact and cost-effectiveness of introducing MenACWY vaccination strategies in GermanyKatharina Schley0Sabrina Janßen1Shannon M. Sullivan2Eszter Tichy3Jamie Findlow4Pfizer Pharma GmbHPfizer Pharma GmbHEvidera/PPDEvidera/PPDPfizer LimitedAbstract Background The invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) routine immunization recommendation in Germany is a meningococcal serogroup C (MenC) conjugate vaccine for toddlers aged 12 months with a catch-up for unimmunized up to 17 years. However, there are no recommendations for routine meningococcal serogroups A, C, W, Y (MenACWY) vaccination or for adolescent vaccinations; this differs from other European countries. This analysis aimed to understand the benefits of implementing adolescent MenACWY vaccination in Germany. Methods A static population-cohort model evaluating IMD burden and related health outcomes (e.g., cases, cases with long-term sequelae, deaths) was developed to compare any two meningococcal vaccination strategies. We compared hypothetical vaccination strategies that included different approaches to adolescent vaccination in Germany, such as vaccinating at 13-year olds versus 16-year olds and vaccinating with MenC versus MenACWY. Additional strategies considered the benefit that could be provided by switching the current MenC vaccine recommendation in toddlers to MenACWY. Results All strategies that included MenACWY vaccine were effective in decreasing the number of cases, preventing mortality and offered good value for money. The greatest benefit was observed in individuals vaccinated with MenACWY at 12 months and 16 years of age (2,978 IMD cases averted; 563 IMD deaths prevented). Compared with the current strategy of MenC vaccination at 12 months of age, two-dose strategies that included MenACWY reported incremental cost-effectiveness ratios <€13,205 per quality-adjusted life year. Adolescent strategies of MenC or MenACWY vaccine at 16 years old (with no vaccination at 12 months) dominated current vaccination strategies. Adolescent vaccination at 16 years old versus 13 years old offered slightly better value for money. Conclusions With recent increases in IMD cases and outbreaks occurring globally following the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a greater urgency to proactively implement a MenACWY vaccine recommendation to protect adolescents in Germany. This recommendation would provide direct protection to a group at increased risk and offer indirect protection to other population groups. Implementation of a school-based immunization program could increase vaccine uptake and overcome hurdles in adolescent vaccination.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21491-3Invasive meningococcal diseaseVaccinationPublic healthPublic policyGermanyMenACWY
spellingShingle Katharina Schley
Sabrina Janßen
Shannon M. Sullivan
Eszter Tichy
Jamie Findlow
Public health impact and cost-effectiveness of introducing MenACWY vaccination strategies in Germany
BMC Public Health
Invasive meningococcal disease
Vaccination
Public health
Public policy
Germany
MenACWY
title Public health impact and cost-effectiveness of introducing MenACWY vaccination strategies in Germany
title_full Public health impact and cost-effectiveness of introducing MenACWY vaccination strategies in Germany
title_fullStr Public health impact and cost-effectiveness of introducing MenACWY vaccination strategies in Germany
title_full_unstemmed Public health impact and cost-effectiveness of introducing MenACWY vaccination strategies in Germany
title_short Public health impact and cost-effectiveness of introducing MenACWY vaccination strategies in Germany
title_sort public health impact and cost effectiveness of introducing menacwy vaccination strategies in germany
topic Invasive meningococcal disease
Vaccination
Public health
Public policy
Germany
MenACWY
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21491-3
work_keys_str_mv AT katharinaschley publichealthimpactandcosteffectivenessofintroducingmenacwyvaccinationstrategiesingermany
AT sabrinajanßen publichealthimpactandcosteffectivenessofintroducingmenacwyvaccinationstrategiesingermany
AT shannonmsullivan publichealthimpactandcosteffectivenessofintroducingmenacwyvaccinationstrategiesingermany
AT esztertichy publichealthimpactandcosteffectivenessofintroducingmenacwyvaccinationstrategiesingermany
AT jamiefindlow publichealthimpactandcosteffectivenessofintroducingmenacwyvaccinationstrategiesingermany