Revisiting Balassa-Samuelson Hypothesis for Asia – A Critical Appraisal of Literature
Purpose: The present study is aimed at presenting a critical appraisal of the empirical literature on the Balassa-Samuelson hypothesis for emerging and developing Asian countries. Design/methodology/approach: A critical appraisal of the relevant studies is carried out across various important dim...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
2023-01-01
|
| Series: | Problemy Zarządzania |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://press.wz.uw.edu.pl/ems/vol21/iss1/2 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Purpose: The present study is aimed at presenting a critical appraisal of the empirical literature on the
Balassa-Samuelson hypothesis for emerging and developing Asian countries.
Design/methodology/approach: A critical appraisal of the relevant studies is carried out across various
important dimensions of the empirical estimation of the Balassa-Samuelson hypothesis including the scheme
of sectoral division followed, definitions and proxy variables used for constructing real exchange rate
and price series, choice of output and employment series and their subsequent transformation, empirical
methodology followed and (theoretically) different variants of the hypothesis chosen for empirical estimation.
Findings: Only a handful of studies have investigated the Balassa-Samuelson hypothesis for Asia.
Nevertheless, these studies are characterized by a variety of irregularities in dealing with different important
features of the theory, which may be of critical importance for yielding consistent empirical estimates.
In multi-country studies for Asia, serious inconsistencies are observed whilst handling these critical
aspects of the hypothesis. Such irregularities may hold serious implications for model estimates since
the empirical evidence from Asia is very mixed, and in many cases, not even robust.
Practical implications: The inconsistencies highlighted in this review paper hold strong implications for
future research in this area. The selection of price indicators for the construction of real exchange rate
series, choice of econometric methodology and the theoretical framework followed are aspects of the
empirical verification of the Balassa-Samuelson hypothesis that need to be handled with great caution since
they turn out to be most sensitive in relation to yielding intuitively correct and robust model estimates.
Originality: To our knowledge, so far, no study on Asia has presented such an extensive appraisal of
literature on the productivity-real exchange rate nexus. The present study is therefore novel in the sense
that it critically evaluates studies on Asia against all those features of the Balssa-Samuelson theory which
may stand responsible for yielding mixed and even contrasting empirical estimates for Asia. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2300-8792 |