Restrictive use of labor induction in absence of proven benefit
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Renée J. Burger, Anita C. J. Ravelli, Sanne J. Gordijn, Wessel Ganzevoort |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2023-08-01
|
| Series: | Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14624 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Offspring school performance at age 12 after induction of labor vs non‐intervention at term: A linked cohort study
by: Renée J. Burger, et al.
Published: (2023-04-01) -
Fetal Growth Restriction: Mechanisms, Epidemiology, and Management
by: Hester D. Kamphof, et al.
Published: (2022-07-01) -
Practice variation in timing of antenatal corticosteroid administration in early‐onset fetal growth restriction: A secondary analysis of the Dutch STRIDER study
by: Leah I. Prins, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Consecutive prediction of adverse maternal outcomes of preeclampsia, using the PIERS-ML and fullPIERS models: A multicountry prospective observational study.
by: Guiyou Yang, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01) -
Does induction of labor at 41 weeks (early, mid or late) improve birth outcomes in low‐risk pregnancy? A nationwide propensity score‐matched study
by: Anita C. J. Ravelli, et al.
Published: (2023-05-01)