GNSS Differential Code Bias Determination Using Rao‐Blackwellized Particle Filtering

Abstract The Assimilative Canadian High Arctic Ionospheric Model (A‐CHAIM) is a near‐real‐time data assimilation model of the high latitude ionosphere, incorporating measurements from many instruments, including slant Total Electron Content measurements from ground‐based Global Navigation Satellite...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ben Reid, David R. Themens, Anthony McCaffrey, P. T. Jayachandran, Mainul Hoque, Andrew J. Mazzella Jr.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-05-01
Series:Space Weather
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2023SW003611
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841536388502126592
author Ben Reid
David R. Themens
Anthony McCaffrey
P. T. Jayachandran
Mainul Hoque
Andrew J. Mazzella Jr.
author_facet Ben Reid
David R. Themens
Anthony McCaffrey
P. T. Jayachandran
Mainul Hoque
Andrew J. Mazzella Jr.
author_sort Ben Reid
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The Assimilative Canadian High Arctic Ionospheric Model (A‐CHAIM) is a near‐real‐time data assimilation model of the high latitude ionosphere, incorporating measurements from many instruments, including slant Total Electron Content measurements from ground‐based Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receivers. These measurements have receiver‐specific Differential Code Biases (DCB) which must be resolved to produce an absolute measurement, which are resolved simultaneously with the ionospheric state using Rao‐Blackwellized particle filtering. These DCBs are compared to published values and to DCBs determined using eight different Global Ionospheric Maps (GIM), which show small but consistent systematic differences. The potential cause of these systematic biases is investigated using multiple experimental A‐CHAIM test runs, including the effect of plasmaspheric electron content. By running tests using the GIM‐derived DCBs, it is shown that using A‐CHAIM DCBs produces the lowest overall error, and that using GIM DCBs causes an overestimation of the topside electron density which can exceed 100% when compared to in situ measurements from DMSP.
format Article
id doaj-art-222be6f2bd3a4685ac4a68b040b452bb
institution Kabale University
issn 1542-7390
language English
publishDate 2024-05-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Space Weather
spelling doaj-art-222be6f2bd3a4685ac4a68b040b452bb2025-01-14T16:27:30ZengWileySpace Weather1542-73902024-05-01225n/an/a10.1029/2023SW003611GNSS Differential Code Bias Determination Using Rao‐Blackwellized Particle FilteringBen Reid0David R. Themens1Anthony McCaffrey2P. T. Jayachandran3Mainul Hoque4Andrew J. Mazzella Jr.5Department of Physics University of New Brunswick Fredericton NB CanadaSchool of Engineering SERENE University of Birmingham Birmingham UKDepartment of Physics University of New Brunswick Fredericton NB CanadaDepartment of Physics University of New Brunswick Fredericton NB CanadaGerman Aerospace Center (DLR) Neustrelitz GermanyNone Watertown Massachusetts USAAbstract The Assimilative Canadian High Arctic Ionospheric Model (A‐CHAIM) is a near‐real‐time data assimilation model of the high latitude ionosphere, incorporating measurements from many instruments, including slant Total Electron Content measurements from ground‐based Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receivers. These measurements have receiver‐specific Differential Code Biases (DCB) which must be resolved to produce an absolute measurement, which are resolved simultaneously with the ionospheric state using Rao‐Blackwellized particle filtering. These DCBs are compared to published values and to DCBs determined using eight different Global Ionospheric Maps (GIM), which show small but consistent systematic differences. The potential cause of these systematic biases is investigated using multiple experimental A‐CHAIM test runs, including the effect of plasmaspheric electron content. By running tests using the GIM‐derived DCBs, it is shown that using A‐CHAIM DCBs produces the lowest overall error, and that using GIM DCBs causes an overestimation of the topside electron density which can exceed 100% when compared to in situ measurements from DMSP.https://doi.org/10.1029/2023SW003611data assimilationGNSSdifferential code biasparticle filterRao‐Blackwellizedreal time
spellingShingle Ben Reid
David R. Themens
Anthony McCaffrey
P. T. Jayachandran
Mainul Hoque
Andrew J. Mazzella Jr.
GNSS Differential Code Bias Determination Using Rao‐Blackwellized Particle Filtering
Space Weather
data assimilation
GNSS
differential code bias
particle filter
Rao‐Blackwellized
real time
title GNSS Differential Code Bias Determination Using Rao‐Blackwellized Particle Filtering
title_full GNSS Differential Code Bias Determination Using Rao‐Blackwellized Particle Filtering
title_fullStr GNSS Differential Code Bias Determination Using Rao‐Blackwellized Particle Filtering
title_full_unstemmed GNSS Differential Code Bias Determination Using Rao‐Blackwellized Particle Filtering
title_short GNSS Differential Code Bias Determination Using Rao‐Blackwellized Particle Filtering
title_sort gnss differential code bias determination using rao blackwellized particle filtering
topic data assimilation
GNSS
differential code bias
particle filter
Rao‐Blackwellized
real time
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2023SW003611
work_keys_str_mv AT benreid gnssdifferentialcodebiasdeterminationusingraoblackwellizedparticlefiltering
AT davidrthemens gnssdifferentialcodebiasdeterminationusingraoblackwellizedparticlefiltering
AT anthonymccaffrey gnssdifferentialcodebiasdeterminationusingraoblackwellizedparticlefiltering
AT ptjayachandran gnssdifferentialcodebiasdeterminationusingraoblackwellizedparticlefiltering
AT mainulhoque gnssdifferentialcodebiasdeterminationusingraoblackwellizedparticlefiltering
AT andrewjmazzellajr gnssdifferentialcodebiasdeterminationusingraoblackwellizedparticlefiltering