Machine learning algorithms for manufacturing quality assurance: A systematic review of performance metrics and applications
Adopting Machine Learning (ML) in manufacturing quality assurance (QA) has accelerated with Industry 4.0, enabling automated defect detection, predictive maintenance, and real-time process optimization. However, selecting the most effective ML model remains challenging due to performance variability...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | Array |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590005625000207 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850118542272233472 |
|---|---|
| author | Ashfakul Karim Kausik Adib Bin Rashid Ramisha Fariha Baki Md Mifthahul Jannat Maktum |
| author_facet | Ashfakul Karim Kausik Adib Bin Rashid Ramisha Fariha Baki Md Mifthahul Jannat Maktum |
| author_sort | Ashfakul Karim Kausik |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Adopting Machine Learning (ML) in manufacturing quality assurance (QA) has accelerated with Industry 4.0, enabling automated defect detection, predictive maintenance, and real-time process optimization. However, selecting the most effective ML model remains challenging due to performance variability, scalability constraints, and inconsistent evaluation metrics across manufacturing sectors. This systematic review analyzes over 300 peer-reviewed studies over the last two decades (mostly analyzing the recent works) to evaluate the effectiveness of widely used ML algorithms—Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), Support Vector Machines (SVMs), Random Forests (RFs), Decision Trees (DTs), and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN)—in QA applications. Performance metrics include accuracy, precision, speed, recall, computational efficiency, scalability, and real-time processing capabilities. Findings reveal that ANNs outperform other models in image-based defect detection, while SVMs and RFs excel in predictive maintenance and process parameter optimization. DTs provide better interpretability for process control, and KNN is effective for small-scale QA implementations. In specific case scenarios, RF models showed particular strength in handling high-dimensional sensor data in fault detection in manufacturing quality assurance operations. The study presents a comparative assessment framework, guiding algorithm selection based on industry-specific requirements and operational constraints. This review provides the latest implementation of ML in QA along with quantitative evidence on which algorithm offers the most optimization in specific industrial settings, which would help in algorithm selection in manufacturing quality assurance in future for both researchers and industrial experts. Also, it offers an overview of the major and minor algorithms based on their performance metrics. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-21b7aa42614b4dfdaf456efddcb87841 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2590-0056 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-07-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Array |
| spelling | doaj-art-21b7aa42614b4dfdaf456efddcb878412025-08-20T02:35:50ZengElsevierArray2590-00562025-07-012610039310.1016/j.array.2025.100393Machine learning algorithms for manufacturing quality assurance: A systematic review of performance metrics and applicationsAshfakul Karim Kausik0Adib Bin Rashid1Ramisha Fariha Baki2Md Mifthahul Jannat Maktum3Industrial and Production Engineering Department, Military Institute of Science and Technology (MIST), Dhaka, BangladeshIndustrial and Production Engineering Department, Military Institute of Science and Technology (MIST), Dhaka, Bangladesh; Corresponding author.Computer Science & Engineering Department, Military Institute of Science and Technology (MIST), Dhaka, BangladeshNaval Architecture & Marine Engineering Department, Military Institute of Science and Technology (MIST), Dhaka, BangladeshAdopting Machine Learning (ML) in manufacturing quality assurance (QA) has accelerated with Industry 4.0, enabling automated defect detection, predictive maintenance, and real-time process optimization. However, selecting the most effective ML model remains challenging due to performance variability, scalability constraints, and inconsistent evaluation metrics across manufacturing sectors. This systematic review analyzes over 300 peer-reviewed studies over the last two decades (mostly analyzing the recent works) to evaluate the effectiveness of widely used ML algorithms—Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), Support Vector Machines (SVMs), Random Forests (RFs), Decision Trees (DTs), and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN)—in QA applications. Performance metrics include accuracy, precision, speed, recall, computational efficiency, scalability, and real-time processing capabilities. Findings reveal that ANNs outperform other models in image-based defect detection, while SVMs and RFs excel in predictive maintenance and process parameter optimization. DTs provide better interpretability for process control, and KNN is effective for small-scale QA implementations. In specific case scenarios, RF models showed particular strength in handling high-dimensional sensor data in fault detection in manufacturing quality assurance operations. The study presents a comparative assessment framework, guiding algorithm selection based on industry-specific requirements and operational constraints. This review provides the latest implementation of ML in QA along with quantitative evidence on which algorithm offers the most optimization in specific industrial settings, which would help in algorithm selection in manufacturing quality assurance in future for both researchers and industrial experts. Also, it offers an overview of the major and minor algorithms based on their performance metrics.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590005625000207Machine learningQuality assuranceArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural networksPredictive analyticsProcess optimization |
| spellingShingle | Ashfakul Karim Kausik Adib Bin Rashid Ramisha Fariha Baki Md Mifthahul Jannat Maktum Machine learning algorithms for manufacturing quality assurance: A systematic review of performance metrics and applications Array Machine learning Quality assurance Artificial intelligence Artificial neural networks Predictive analytics Process optimization |
| title | Machine learning algorithms for manufacturing quality assurance: A systematic review of performance metrics and applications |
| title_full | Machine learning algorithms for manufacturing quality assurance: A systematic review of performance metrics and applications |
| title_fullStr | Machine learning algorithms for manufacturing quality assurance: A systematic review of performance metrics and applications |
| title_full_unstemmed | Machine learning algorithms for manufacturing quality assurance: A systematic review of performance metrics and applications |
| title_short | Machine learning algorithms for manufacturing quality assurance: A systematic review of performance metrics and applications |
| title_sort | machine learning algorithms for manufacturing quality assurance a systematic review of performance metrics and applications |
| topic | Machine learning Quality assurance Artificial intelligence Artificial neural networks Predictive analytics Process optimization |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590005625000207 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ashfakulkarimkausik machinelearningalgorithmsformanufacturingqualityassuranceasystematicreviewofperformancemetricsandapplications AT adibbinrashid machinelearningalgorithmsformanufacturingqualityassuranceasystematicreviewofperformancemetricsandapplications AT ramishafarihabaki machinelearningalgorithmsformanufacturingqualityassuranceasystematicreviewofperformancemetricsandapplications AT mdmifthahuljannatmaktum machinelearningalgorithmsformanufacturingqualityassuranceasystematicreviewofperformancemetricsandapplications |