Expression of Concern on “The Comparative Analysis of Two RT-qPCR Kits for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Reveals a Higher Risk of False-Negative Diagnosis in Samples with High Quantification Cycles for Viral and Internal Genes”

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-01-01
Series:Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/9798013
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849701509319622656
author Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology
author_facet Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology
author_sort Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology
collection DOAJ
format Article
id doaj-art-212aa9b2d0fb450fae6fdd1056fce463
institution DOAJ
issn 1918-1493
language English
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology
spelling doaj-art-212aa9b2d0fb450fae6fdd1056fce4632025-08-20T03:17:55ZengWileyCanadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology1918-14932023-01-01202310.1155/2023/9798013Expression of Concern on “The Comparative Analysis of Two RT-qPCR Kits for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Reveals a Higher Risk of False-Negative Diagnosis in Samples with High Quantification Cycles for Viral and Internal Genes”Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiologyhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/9798013
spellingShingle Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology
Expression of Concern on “The Comparative Analysis of Two RT-qPCR Kits for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Reveals a Higher Risk of False-Negative Diagnosis in Samples with High Quantification Cycles for Viral and Internal Genes”
Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology
title Expression of Concern on “The Comparative Analysis of Two RT-qPCR Kits for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Reveals a Higher Risk of False-Negative Diagnosis in Samples with High Quantification Cycles for Viral and Internal Genes”
title_full Expression of Concern on “The Comparative Analysis of Two RT-qPCR Kits for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Reveals a Higher Risk of False-Negative Diagnosis in Samples with High Quantification Cycles for Viral and Internal Genes”
title_fullStr Expression of Concern on “The Comparative Analysis of Two RT-qPCR Kits for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Reveals a Higher Risk of False-Negative Diagnosis in Samples with High Quantification Cycles for Viral and Internal Genes”
title_full_unstemmed Expression of Concern on “The Comparative Analysis of Two RT-qPCR Kits for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Reveals a Higher Risk of False-Negative Diagnosis in Samples with High Quantification Cycles for Viral and Internal Genes”
title_short Expression of Concern on “The Comparative Analysis of Two RT-qPCR Kits for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Reveals a Higher Risk of False-Negative Diagnosis in Samples with High Quantification Cycles for Viral and Internal Genes”
title_sort expression of concern on the comparative analysis of two rt qpcr kits for detecting sars cov 2 reveals a higher risk of false negative diagnosis in samples with high quantification cycles for viral and internal genes
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/9798013
work_keys_str_mv AT canadianjournalofinfectiousdiseasesandmedicalmicrobiology expressionofconcernonthecomparativeanalysisoftwortqpcrkitsfordetectingsarscov2revealsahigherriskoffalsenegativediagnosisinsampleswithhighquantificationcyclesforviralandinternalgenes