1-year data on patient-reported outcome is enough after surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy: a cohort study from the Swedish Spine register

Background and purpose: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the most common cause of spinal cord dysfunction in adults. Repeated follow-ups after surgery are resource consuming. The aim was to examine whether patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) change after the first year. The purpose o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lovisa Gerdhem, Anna MacDowall, Paul Gerdhem
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Medical Journals Sweden 2025-01-01
Series:Acta Orthopaedica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://actaorthop.org/actao/article/view/42630
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background and purpose: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the most common cause of spinal cord dysfunction in adults. Repeated follow-ups after surgery are resource consuming. The aim was to examine whether patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) change after the first year. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether it is necessary to obtain follow-up data from patients more than 1 year after surgery for DCM. Methods: We included individuals treated surgically for DCM in the Swedish Spine registry (Swespine), with available preoperative, 1-, and 2-year PROMs, primarily the European Myelopathy Scale (EMS) and secondarily the Neck Disability Index (NDI), and the European Quality of life Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS). A tertiary analysis included available 5-year data. Median, interquartile range (IQR), and Bland–Altman plots were used to compare PROM data at different follow-up time points. Results: 642 individuals had baseline, 1-, and 2-year follow-up data, of whom 347 also had 5-year data. EMS was 14 (12–16) preoperative, 15 (12–17) at the 1-year follow-up, and 15 (12–17) at the 2-year follow-up. Corresponding data for NDI was 38 (24–50), 25 (12–42), and 26 (12–42) and for EQ-VAS 50 (30–60), 60 (42–77), and 60 (40–75). Similar findings were seen in individuals who also had 5-year data. Bland–Altman plots indicated good agreement between 1- and 2-year data, and between 1- and 5-year data and were without proportional bias. Conclusion: In individuals treated for DCM no clinically meaningful change in PROMs occurred after the 1-year follow-up.
ISSN:1745-3674
1745-3682