Callimachean Criticism in Anaximenes SH 45 and Choerilus of Iasos SH 333

This article traces the relics of Callimachean criticism in the testimonia to the work of Anaximenes of Lampsacus and Choerilus of Iasos, portrayed either as poet-sycophants or authors of bad quality poetry. It assesses the profile of Anaximenes as an epic writer and investigates the origin and dyna...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marco Perale
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: ENS Éditions 2024-11-01
Series:Aitia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/aitia/12081
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850168856354488320
author Marco Perale
author_facet Marco Perale
author_sort Marco Perale
collection DOAJ
description This article traces the relics of Callimachean criticism in the testimonia to the work of Anaximenes of Lampsacus and Choerilus of Iasos, portrayed either as poet-sycophants or authors of bad quality poetry. It assesses the profile of Anaximenes as an epic writer and investigates the origin and dynamics of the confusion between Choerilus of Iasos and Choerilus of Samos in late Hellenistic and Imperial witnesses. It concludes that the negative judgment on Choerilus of Samos formulated by Istrus, a disciple of Callimachus, may have been wrongly transferred to Choerilus of Iasos and that it influenced later critics and writers’ perception of the latter.
format Article
id doaj-art-20f3da3467604b7fa1370ef5b72f2c4c
institution OA Journals
issn 1775-4275
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher ENS Éditions
record_format Article
series Aitia
spelling doaj-art-20f3da3467604b7fa1370ef5b72f2c4c2025-08-20T02:20:52ZengENS ÉditionsAitia1775-42752024-11-0113210.4000/12t47Callimachean Criticism in Anaximenes SH 45 and Choerilus of Iasos SH 333Marco PeraleThis article traces the relics of Callimachean criticism in the testimonia to the work of Anaximenes of Lampsacus and Choerilus of Iasos, portrayed either as poet-sycophants or authors of bad quality poetry. It assesses the profile of Anaximenes as an epic writer and investigates the origin and dynamics of the confusion between Choerilus of Iasos and Choerilus of Samos in late Hellenistic and Imperial witnesses. It concludes that the negative judgment on Choerilus of Samos formulated by Istrus, a disciple of Callimachus, may have been wrongly transferred to Choerilus of Iasos and that it influenced later critics and writers’ perception of the latter.https://journals.openedition.org/aitia/12081CallimachusChoerilus of SamosChoerilus of IasosAnaximenesIstrus
spellingShingle Marco Perale
Callimachean Criticism in Anaximenes SH 45 and Choerilus of Iasos SH 333
Aitia
Callimachus
Choerilus of Samos
Choerilus of Iasos
Anaximenes
Istrus
title Callimachean Criticism in Anaximenes SH 45 and Choerilus of Iasos SH 333
title_full Callimachean Criticism in Anaximenes SH 45 and Choerilus of Iasos SH 333
title_fullStr Callimachean Criticism in Anaximenes SH 45 and Choerilus of Iasos SH 333
title_full_unstemmed Callimachean Criticism in Anaximenes SH 45 and Choerilus of Iasos SH 333
title_short Callimachean Criticism in Anaximenes SH 45 and Choerilus of Iasos SH 333
title_sort callimachean criticism in anaximenes sh 45 and choerilus of iasos sh 333
topic Callimachus
Choerilus of Samos
Choerilus of Iasos
Anaximenes
Istrus
url https://journals.openedition.org/aitia/12081
work_keys_str_mv AT marcoperale callimacheancriticisminanaximenessh45andchoerilusofiasossh333