“Morphogenetic Action” Principle for 3D Shape Formation by the Growth of Thin Sheets
How does growth encode form in developing organisms? Many different spatiotemporal growth profiles may sculpt tissues into the same target 3D shapes, but only specific growth patterns are observed in animal and plant development. In particular, growth profiles may differ in their degree of spatial v...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
American Physical Society
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Physical Review X |
| Online Access: | http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.15.021068 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849719570331336704 |
|---|---|
| author | Dillon J. Cislo Anastasios Pavlopoulos Boris I. Shraiman |
| author_facet | Dillon J. Cislo Anastasios Pavlopoulos Boris I. Shraiman |
| author_sort | Dillon J. Cislo |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | How does growth encode form in developing organisms? Many different spatiotemporal growth profiles may sculpt tissues into the same target 3D shapes, but only specific growth patterns are observed in animal and plant development. In particular, growth profiles may differ in their degree of spatial variation and growth anisotropy; however, the criteria that distinguish observed patterns of growth from other possible alternatives are not understood. Here we exploit the mathematical formalism of quasiconformal transformations to formulate the problem of “growth pattern selection” quantitatively in the context of 3D shape formation by growing 2D epithelial sheets. We propose that nature settles on growth patterns that are the “simplest” in a certain way. Specifically, we demonstrate that growth pattern selection can be formulated as an optimization problem and solved for the trajectories that minimize spatiotemporal variation in areal growth rates and deformation anisotropy. The result is a complete prediction for the growth of the surface, including not only a set of intermediate shapes, but also a prediction for cell displacement along those surfaces in the process of growth. Optimization of growth trajectories for both idealized surfaces and those observed in nature show that relative growth rates can be uniformized at the cost of introducing anisotropy. Minimizing the variation of programmed growth rates can therefore be viewed as a generic mechanism for growth pattern selection and may help us to understand the prevalence of anisotropy in developmental programs. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-20c83348a59d4eb8ba2d9512fdccd08d |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2160-3308 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-05-01 |
| publisher | American Physical Society |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Physical Review X |
| spelling | doaj-art-20c83348a59d4eb8ba2d9512fdccd08d2025-08-20T03:12:08ZengAmerican Physical SocietyPhysical Review X2160-33082025-05-0115202106810.1103/PhysRevX.15.021068“Morphogenetic Action” Principle for 3D Shape Formation by the Growth of Thin SheetsDillon J. CisloAnastasios PavlopoulosBoris I. ShraimanHow does growth encode form in developing organisms? Many different spatiotemporal growth profiles may sculpt tissues into the same target 3D shapes, but only specific growth patterns are observed in animal and plant development. In particular, growth profiles may differ in their degree of spatial variation and growth anisotropy; however, the criteria that distinguish observed patterns of growth from other possible alternatives are not understood. Here we exploit the mathematical formalism of quasiconformal transformations to formulate the problem of “growth pattern selection” quantitatively in the context of 3D shape formation by growing 2D epithelial sheets. We propose that nature settles on growth patterns that are the “simplest” in a certain way. Specifically, we demonstrate that growth pattern selection can be formulated as an optimization problem and solved for the trajectories that minimize spatiotemporal variation in areal growth rates and deformation anisotropy. The result is a complete prediction for the growth of the surface, including not only a set of intermediate shapes, but also a prediction for cell displacement along those surfaces in the process of growth. Optimization of growth trajectories for both idealized surfaces and those observed in nature show that relative growth rates can be uniformized at the cost of introducing anisotropy. Minimizing the variation of programmed growth rates can therefore be viewed as a generic mechanism for growth pattern selection and may help us to understand the prevalence of anisotropy in developmental programs.http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.15.021068 |
| spellingShingle | Dillon J. Cislo Anastasios Pavlopoulos Boris I. Shraiman “Morphogenetic Action” Principle for 3D Shape Formation by the Growth of Thin Sheets Physical Review X |
| title | “Morphogenetic Action” Principle for 3D Shape Formation by the Growth of Thin Sheets |
| title_full | “Morphogenetic Action” Principle for 3D Shape Formation by the Growth of Thin Sheets |
| title_fullStr | “Morphogenetic Action” Principle for 3D Shape Formation by the Growth of Thin Sheets |
| title_full_unstemmed | “Morphogenetic Action” Principle for 3D Shape Formation by the Growth of Thin Sheets |
| title_short | “Morphogenetic Action” Principle for 3D Shape Formation by the Growth of Thin Sheets |
| title_sort | morphogenetic action principle for 3d shape formation by the growth of thin sheets |
| url | http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.15.021068 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT dillonjcislo morphogeneticactionprinciplefor3dshapeformationbythegrowthofthinsheets AT anastasiospavlopoulos morphogeneticactionprinciplefor3dshapeformationbythegrowthofthinsheets AT borisishraiman morphogeneticactionprinciplefor3dshapeformationbythegrowthofthinsheets |