China's artificial islands in the south China sea: geopolitics versus rule of law

China’s construction of artificial islands during last few years has raised concerns about militarisation of the South China Sea threatening stability and security for littoral countries. China claims over 80 per cent of the South China Sea and it is building landing and garrison facilities over geo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Swaran Singh, Lilian Yamamoto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PUCPRESS 2017-08-01
Series:Revista de Direito Econômico e Socioambiental
Subjects:
Online Access:https://periodicos.pucpr.br/index.php/direitoeconomico/article/view/7451
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850084858655670272
author Swaran Singh
Lilian Yamamoto
author_facet Swaran Singh
Lilian Yamamoto
author_sort Swaran Singh
collection DOAJ
description China’s construction of artificial islands during last few years has raised concerns about militarisation of the South China Sea threatening stability and security for littoral countries. China claims over 80 per cent of the South China Sea and it is building landing and garrison facilities over geographical features classified as rocks and coral reefs. China's claims are grounded on their supposed discovery and occupation of these features since antiquity. Other claimants, like the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Taiwan, Brunei and Indonesia, have their own historical narratives and cite articles of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) to justify their sovereignty over part of this disputed maritime region. This multilateral nature of dispute makes it extremely complicated and China's increasingly assertive policies have further compounded it. Accordingly, several nations, including United States, have raised alarm regarding freedom of navigation across the South China Sea. It in this backdrop of rising tensions that this article examines these multiple narratives and what UNCLOS and the Permanent Court of Arbitration say in clarifying the legality of maritime rights to crystal gaze likely future trajectories. However, this study also recognizes that while UNCLOS remains at the core of maritime dispute settlement, it is the evolving geopolitics of Asia that will go a long way in guiding both the interpretation of UNCLOS as also state responses in terms of their proposals for joint development or unilateral strategies.
format Article
id doaj-art-209a2cccb5d04f49af64c257e6a924ea
institution DOAJ
issn 2179-345X
2179-8214
language English
publishDate 2017-08-01
publisher PUCPRESS
record_format Article
series Revista de Direito Econômico e Socioambiental
spelling doaj-art-209a2cccb5d04f49af64c257e6a924ea2025-08-20T02:43:54ZengPUCPRESSRevista de Direito Econômico e Socioambiental2179-345X2179-82142017-08-018142310.7213/rev.dir.econ.soc.v8i1.745117058China's artificial islands in the south China sea: geopolitics versus rule of lawSwaran Singh0Lilian Yamamoto1Jawaharlal Nehru University - IndiaUniversidade de São Paulo - USPChina’s construction of artificial islands during last few years has raised concerns about militarisation of the South China Sea threatening stability and security for littoral countries. China claims over 80 per cent of the South China Sea and it is building landing and garrison facilities over geographical features classified as rocks and coral reefs. China's claims are grounded on their supposed discovery and occupation of these features since antiquity. Other claimants, like the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Taiwan, Brunei and Indonesia, have their own historical narratives and cite articles of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) to justify their sovereignty over part of this disputed maritime region. This multilateral nature of dispute makes it extremely complicated and China's increasingly assertive policies have further compounded it. Accordingly, several nations, including United States, have raised alarm regarding freedom of navigation across the South China Sea. It in this backdrop of rising tensions that this article examines these multiple narratives and what UNCLOS and the Permanent Court of Arbitration say in clarifying the legality of maritime rights to crystal gaze likely future trajectories. However, this study also recognizes that while UNCLOS remains at the core of maritime dispute settlement, it is the evolving geopolitics of Asia that will go a long way in guiding both the interpretation of UNCLOS as also state responses in terms of their proposals for joint development or unilateral strategies.https://periodicos.pucpr.br/index.php/direitoeconomico/article/view/7451south china seaartificial islandsunited nations convention on the law of the searule of lawspratly islands.
spellingShingle Swaran Singh
Lilian Yamamoto
China's artificial islands in the south China sea: geopolitics versus rule of law
Revista de Direito Econômico e Socioambiental
south china sea
artificial islands
united nations convention on the law of the sea
rule of law
spratly islands.
title China's artificial islands in the south China sea: geopolitics versus rule of law
title_full China's artificial islands in the south China sea: geopolitics versus rule of law
title_fullStr China's artificial islands in the south China sea: geopolitics versus rule of law
title_full_unstemmed China's artificial islands in the south China sea: geopolitics versus rule of law
title_short China's artificial islands in the south China sea: geopolitics versus rule of law
title_sort china s artificial islands in the south china sea geopolitics versus rule of law
topic south china sea
artificial islands
united nations convention on the law of the sea
rule of law
spratly islands.
url https://periodicos.pucpr.br/index.php/direitoeconomico/article/view/7451
work_keys_str_mv AT swaransingh chinasartificialislandsinthesouthchinaseageopoliticsversusruleoflaw
AT lilianyamamoto chinasartificialislandsinthesouthchinaseageopoliticsversusruleoflaw