Shelf-Life Assessment of Canola Protein Bio-Adhesive
The storage stability of binders before their application is a crucial factor in the wood panel industry, as it impacts the mechanical properties, quality control, economic efficiency, and market competitiveness of the final products. In the present study, the long-term stability of two canola prote...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
North Carolina State University
2025-01-01
|
Series: | BioResources |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ojs.bioresources.com/index.php/BRJ/article/view/24167 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1823859594944839680 |
---|---|
author | Lawrence Tene Tayo Aldo Joao Cárdenas-Oscanoa Lizhen Chen Darshan Shivappa Nayaka Markus Euring |
author_facet | Lawrence Tene Tayo Aldo Joao Cárdenas-Oscanoa Lizhen Chen Darshan Shivappa Nayaka Markus Euring |
author_sort | Lawrence Tene Tayo |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The storage stability of binders before their application is a crucial factor in the wood panel industry, as it impacts the mechanical properties, quality control, economic efficiency, and market competitiveness of the final products. In the present study, the long-term stability of two canola protein isolate (CPI) and two canola meal (CM) adhesive variants was investigated. The protein-based adhesives were prepared and tested on one-layer particleboards after one week, one month, two months, three months, and four months of storage of the formulations. Results indicate that the CPI-based outperformed the CM-based variants in terms of internal bonding strength (IB), modulus of rupture (MOR), and modulus of elasticity (MOE) due to the higher protein concentration of the CPI over the CM. While the IB strength of the CM-bonded particleboards was lower than the EN 319 requirement after the first four weeks of storage (0.34 N/mm2 and 0.29 N/mm2 for nitrite and bisulfate-crosslinked respectively), that of the CPI-bonded was still superior to the EN 319 after four months (0.44 N/mm2 and 0.3 N/mm2 for nitrite and bisulfate-crosslinked respectively). This indicates that the nitrite-crosslinked variants had a more robust chemical formulation, leading to stronger and more durable bonds. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-207322a1796a438b82d692d5f20e220a |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1930-2126 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
publisher | North Carolina State University |
record_format | Article |
series | BioResources |
spelling | doaj-art-207322a1796a438b82d692d5f20e220a2025-02-10T23:56:27ZengNorth Carolina State UniversityBioResources1930-21262025-01-01201211521342424Shelf-Life Assessment of Canola Protein Bio-AdhesiveLawrence Tene Tayo0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2336-5259Aldo Joao Cárdenas-Oscanoa1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3093-8414Lizhen Chen2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3229-626XDarshan Shivappa Nayaka3https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3392-2081Markus Euring4https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5016-1740Wood Technology and Wood-based Composites, Faculty of Forest Sciences and Forest Ecology, Georg-August-University of Göttingen, Büsgenweg 4, Göttingen, 37077, GermanyWood Technology and Wood-based Composites, Faculty of Forest Sciences and Forest Ecology, Georg-August-University of Goettingen and Forest Industry Department, Faculty of Forest Sciences, Universidad National Agraria La MolinaWood Technology and Wood-based Composites, Faculty of Forest Sciences and Forest Ecology, Georg-August-University of Göttingen, Büsgenweg 4, Göttingen, 37077, GermanyWood Technology and Wood-based Composites, Faculty of Forest Sciences and Forest Ecology, Georg-August-University of Göttingen, Büsgenweg 4, Göttingen, 37077, GermanyWood Technology and Wood-based Composites, Faculty of Forest Sciences and Forest Ecology, Georg-August-University of Göttingen, Büsgenweg 4, Göttingen, 37077, GermanyThe storage stability of binders before their application is a crucial factor in the wood panel industry, as it impacts the mechanical properties, quality control, economic efficiency, and market competitiveness of the final products. In the present study, the long-term stability of two canola protein isolate (CPI) and two canola meal (CM) adhesive variants was investigated. The protein-based adhesives were prepared and tested on one-layer particleboards after one week, one month, two months, three months, and four months of storage of the formulations. Results indicate that the CPI-based outperformed the CM-based variants in terms of internal bonding strength (IB), modulus of rupture (MOR), and modulus of elasticity (MOE) due to the higher protein concentration of the CPI over the CM. While the IB strength of the CM-bonded particleboards was lower than the EN 319 requirement after the first four weeks of storage (0.34 N/mm2 and 0.29 N/mm2 for nitrite and bisulfate-crosslinked respectively), that of the CPI-bonded was still superior to the EN 319 after four months (0.44 N/mm2 and 0.3 N/mm2 for nitrite and bisulfate-crosslinked respectively). This indicates that the nitrite-crosslinked variants had a more robust chemical formulation, leading to stronger and more durable bonds.https://ojs.bioresources.com/index.php/BRJ/article/view/24167canola proteincanola mealbio-adhesivestorage timeparticleboards |
spellingShingle | Lawrence Tene Tayo Aldo Joao Cárdenas-Oscanoa Lizhen Chen Darshan Shivappa Nayaka Markus Euring Shelf-Life Assessment of Canola Protein Bio-Adhesive BioResources canola protein canola meal bio-adhesive storage time particleboards |
title | Shelf-Life Assessment of Canola Protein Bio-Adhesive |
title_full | Shelf-Life Assessment of Canola Protein Bio-Adhesive |
title_fullStr | Shelf-Life Assessment of Canola Protein Bio-Adhesive |
title_full_unstemmed | Shelf-Life Assessment of Canola Protein Bio-Adhesive |
title_short | Shelf-Life Assessment of Canola Protein Bio-Adhesive |
title_sort | shelf life assessment of canola protein bio adhesive |
topic | canola protein canola meal bio-adhesive storage time particleboards |
url | https://ojs.bioresources.com/index.php/BRJ/article/view/24167 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lawrencetenetayo shelflifeassessmentofcanolaproteinbioadhesive AT aldojoaocardenasoscanoa shelflifeassessmentofcanolaproteinbioadhesive AT lizhenchen shelflifeassessmentofcanolaproteinbioadhesive AT darshanshivappanayaka shelflifeassessmentofcanolaproteinbioadhesive AT markuseuring shelflifeassessmentofcanolaproteinbioadhesive |