Shelf-Life Assessment of Canola Protein Bio-Adhesive

The storage stability of binders before their application is a crucial factor in the wood panel industry, as it impacts the mechanical properties, quality control, economic efficiency, and market competitiveness of the final products. In the present study, the long-term stability of two canola prote...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lawrence Tene Tayo, Aldo Joao Cárdenas-Oscanoa, Lizhen Chen, Darshan Shivappa Nayaka, Markus Euring
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: North Carolina State University 2025-01-01
Series:BioResources
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.bioresources.com/index.php/BRJ/article/view/24167
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823859594944839680
author Lawrence Tene Tayo
Aldo Joao Cárdenas-Oscanoa
Lizhen Chen
Darshan Shivappa Nayaka
Markus Euring
author_facet Lawrence Tene Tayo
Aldo Joao Cárdenas-Oscanoa
Lizhen Chen
Darshan Shivappa Nayaka
Markus Euring
author_sort Lawrence Tene Tayo
collection DOAJ
description The storage stability of binders before their application is a crucial factor in the wood panel industry, as it impacts the mechanical properties, quality control, economic efficiency, and market competitiveness of the final products. In the present study, the long-term stability of two canola protein isolate (CPI) and two canola meal (CM) adhesive variants was investigated. The protein-based adhesives were prepared and tested on one-layer particleboards after one week, one month, two months, three months, and four months of storage of the formulations. Results indicate that the CPI-based outperformed the CM-based variants in terms of internal bonding strength (IB), modulus of rupture (MOR), and modulus of elasticity (MOE) due to the higher protein concentration of the CPI over the CM. While the IB strength of the CM-bonded particleboards was lower than the EN 319 requirement after the first four weeks of storage (0.34 N/mm2 and 0.29 N/mm2 for nitrite and bisulfate-crosslinked respectively), that of the CPI-bonded was still superior to the EN 319 after four months (0.44 N/mm2 and 0.3 N/mm2 for nitrite and bisulfate-crosslinked respectively). This indicates that the nitrite-crosslinked variants had a more robust chemical formulation, leading to stronger and more durable bonds.
format Article
id doaj-art-207322a1796a438b82d692d5f20e220a
institution Kabale University
issn 1930-2126
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher North Carolina State University
record_format Article
series BioResources
spelling doaj-art-207322a1796a438b82d692d5f20e220a2025-02-10T23:56:27ZengNorth Carolina State UniversityBioResources1930-21262025-01-01201211521342424Shelf-Life Assessment of Canola Protein Bio-AdhesiveLawrence Tene Tayo0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2336-5259Aldo Joao Cárdenas-Oscanoa1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3093-8414Lizhen Chen2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3229-626XDarshan Shivappa Nayaka3https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3392-2081Markus Euring4https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5016-1740Wood Technology and Wood-based Composites, Faculty of Forest Sciences and Forest Ecology, Georg-August-University of Göttingen, Büsgenweg 4, Göttingen, 37077, GermanyWood Technology and Wood-based Composites, Faculty of Forest Sciences and Forest Ecology, Georg-August-University of Goettingen and Forest Industry Department, Faculty of Forest Sciences, Universidad National Agraria La MolinaWood Technology and Wood-based Composites, Faculty of Forest Sciences and Forest Ecology, Georg-August-University of Göttingen, Büsgenweg 4, Göttingen, 37077, GermanyWood Technology and Wood-based Composites, Faculty of Forest Sciences and Forest Ecology, Georg-August-University of Göttingen, Büsgenweg 4, Göttingen, 37077, GermanyWood Technology and Wood-based Composites, Faculty of Forest Sciences and Forest Ecology, Georg-August-University of Göttingen, Büsgenweg 4, Göttingen, 37077, GermanyThe storage stability of binders before their application is a crucial factor in the wood panel industry, as it impacts the mechanical properties, quality control, economic efficiency, and market competitiveness of the final products. In the present study, the long-term stability of two canola protein isolate (CPI) and two canola meal (CM) adhesive variants was investigated. The protein-based adhesives were prepared and tested on one-layer particleboards after one week, one month, two months, three months, and four months of storage of the formulations. Results indicate that the CPI-based outperformed the CM-based variants in terms of internal bonding strength (IB), modulus of rupture (MOR), and modulus of elasticity (MOE) due to the higher protein concentration of the CPI over the CM. While the IB strength of the CM-bonded particleboards was lower than the EN 319 requirement after the first four weeks of storage (0.34 N/mm2 and 0.29 N/mm2 for nitrite and bisulfate-crosslinked respectively), that of the CPI-bonded was still superior to the EN 319 after four months (0.44 N/mm2 and 0.3 N/mm2 for nitrite and bisulfate-crosslinked respectively). This indicates that the nitrite-crosslinked variants had a more robust chemical formulation, leading to stronger and more durable bonds.https://ojs.bioresources.com/index.php/BRJ/article/view/24167canola proteincanola mealbio-adhesivestorage timeparticleboards
spellingShingle Lawrence Tene Tayo
Aldo Joao Cárdenas-Oscanoa
Lizhen Chen
Darshan Shivappa Nayaka
Markus Euring
Shelf-Life Assessment of Canola Protein Bio-Adhesive
BioResources
canola protein
canola meal
bio-adhesive
storage time
particleboards
title Shelf-Life Assessment of Canola Protein Bio-Adhesive
title_full Shelf-Life Assessment of Canola Protein Bio-Adhesive
title_fullStr Shelf-Life Assessment of Canola Protein Bio-Adhesive
title_full_unstemmed Shelf-Life Assessment of Canola Protein Bio-Adhesive
title_short Shelf-Life Assessment of Canola Protein Bio-Adhesive
title_sort shelf life assessment of canola protein bio adhesive
topic canola protein
canola meal
bio-adhesive
storage time
particleboards
url https://ojs.bioresources.com/index.php/BRJ/article/view/24167
work_keys_str_mv AT lawrencetenetayo shelflifeassessmentofcanolaproteinbioadhesive
AT aldojoaocardenasoscanoa shelflifeassessmentofcanolaproteinbioadhesive
AT lizhenchen shelflifeassessmentofcanolaproteinbioadhesive
AT darshanshivappanayaka shelflifeassessmentofcanolaproteinbioadhesive
AT markuseuring shelflifeassessmentofcanolaproteinbioadhesive