Detection of Helicobacter pylori in stool specimens: comparative evaluation of nested PCR and antigen detection

Background: Efficacy of Helicobacter pylori stool antigen enzyme immunoassay (HpSA) and stool PCR was evaluated, before and after treatment, in a country with a high prevalence of H. pylori infection. Methodology: A total of 52 patients with dyspeptic symptoms were included in the study. Antral biop...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shrutkirti Mishra, Varsha Singh, GRKoteswar Rao, Ashok Kumar Jain, Vinod Kumar Dixit, Anil Kumar Gulati, Gopal Nath
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries 2008-06-01
Series:Journal of Infection in Developing Countries
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jidc.org/index.php/journal/article/view/264
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850187334636535808
author Shrutkirti Mishra
Varsha Singh
GRKoteswar Rao
Ashok Kumar Jain
Vinod Kumar Dixit
Anil Kumar Gulati
Gopal Nath
author_facet Shrutkirti Mishra
Varsha Singh
GRKoteswar Rao
Ashok Kumar Jain
Vinod Kumar Dixit
Anil Kumar Gulati
Gopal Nath
author_sort Shrutkirti Mishra
collection DOAJ
description Background: Efficacy of Helicobacter pylori stool antigen enzyme immunoassay (HpSA) and stool PCR was evaluated, before and after treatment, in a country with a high prevalence of H. pylori infection. Methodology: A total of 52 patients with dyspeptic symptoms were included in the study. Antral biopsy was collected during pre- and post-therapy periods for rapid urease test (RUT) and PCR. Similarly stool specimens for PCR and HpSA test were collected during both the periods from all 52 patients. Biopsy, PCR and RUT results together were considered the "gold standard." Results: On the basis of gold standard tests, 40/52 patients were H. pylori positive. The sensitivity and specificity of HpSA test were 80% and 83.3% respectively in untreated patients. On the other hand, the sensitivity and specificity of stool PCR in untreated patients were 72.5% and 100% respectively. After eradication therapy, the results of both RUT and biopsy PCR were negative in 87.5% and positive in 12.5% of the patients. Although post treatment sensitivity of HpSA and stool PCR was equal (60%), specificity of HpSA and stool PCR were 68.6% and 97.1% respectively. Conclusion: The H. pylori stool tests represent a non-invasive concept for diagnosis of infection. Both HpSA and stool PCR seem to be satisfactory tests for pre-eradication as well as assessment of infection. But stool PCR is a better indicator than HpSA test in the post-eradication assessment of infection.
format Article
id doaj-art-20674555eee94f67ad4f04fac4a8c0e9
institution OA Journals
issn 1972-2680
language English
publishDate 2008-06-01
publisher The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries
record_format Article
series Journal of Infection in Developing Countries
spelling doaj-art-20674555eee94f67ad4f04fac4a8c0e92025-08-20T02:16:07ZengThe Journal of Infection in Developing CountriesJournal of Infection in Developing Countries1972-26802008-06-0120310.3855/jidc.264Detection of Helicobacter pylori in stool specimens: comparative evaluation of nested PCR and antigen detectionShrutkirti Mishra0Varsha Singh1GRKoteswar Rao2Ashok Kumar Jain3Vinod Kumar Dixit4Anil Kumar Gulati5Gopal Nath6Department of Biochemistry, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi-221005Department of Biochemistry, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi-221005Department of Biochemistry, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi-221005Department of Gastroenterology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi-221005Department of Gastroenterology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi-221005Department of Microbiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi-221005Department of Biochemistry, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi-221005Background: Efficacy of Helicobacter pylori stool antigen enzyme immunoassay (HpSA) and stool PCR was evaluated, before and after treatment, in a country with a high prevalence of H. pylori infection. Methodology: A total of 52 patients with dyspeptic symptoms were included in the study. Antral biopsy was collected during pre- and post-therapy periods for rapid urease test (RUT) and PCR. Similarly stool specimens for PCR and HpSA test were collected during both the periods from all 52 patients. Biopsy, PCR and RUT results together were considered the "gold standard." Results: On the basis of gold standard tests, 40/52 patients were H. pylori positive. The sensitivity and specificity of HpSA test were 80% and 83.3% respectively in untreated patients. On the other hand, the sensitivity and specificity of stool PCR in untreated patients were 72.5% and 100% respectively. After eradication therapy, the results of both RUT and biopsy PCR were negative in 87.5% and positive in 12.5% of the patients. Although post treatment sensitivity of HpSA and stool PCR was equal (60%), specificity of HpSA and stool PCR were 68.6% and 97.1% respectively. Conclusion: The H. pylori stool tests represent a non-invasive concept for diagnosis of infection. Both HpSA and stool PCR seem to be satisfactory tests for pre-eradication as well as assessment of infection. But stool PCR is a better indicator than HpSA test in the post-eradication assessment of infection.https://jidc.org/index.php/journal/article/view/264H. pyloriHpSAStool PCRBiopsy PCRRUThsp
spellingShingle Shrutkirti Mishra
Varsha Singh
GRKoteswar Rao
Ashok Kumar Jain
Vinod Kumar Dixit
Anil Kumar Gulati
Gopal Nath
Detection of Helicobacter pylori in stool specimens: comparative evaluation of nested PCR and antigen detection
Journal of Infection in Developing Countries
H. pylori
HpSA
Stool PCR
Biopsy PCR
RUT
hsp
title Detection of Helicobacter pylori in stool specimens: comparative evaluation of nested PCR and antigen detection
title_full Detection of Helicobacter pylori in stool specimens: comparative evaluation of nested PCR and antigen detection
title_fullStr Detection of Helicobacter pylori in stool specimens: comparative evaluation of nested PCR and antigen detection
title_full_unstemmed Detection of Helicobacter pylori in stool specimens: comparative evaluation of nested PCR and antigen detection
title_short Detection of Helicobacter pylori in stool specimens: comparative evaluation of nested PCR and antigen detection
title_sort detection of helicobacter pylori in stool specimens comparative evaluation of nested pcr and antigen detection
topic H. pylori
HpSA
Stool PCR
Biopsy PCR
RUT
hsp
url https://jidc.org/index.php/journal/article/view/264
work_keys_str_mv AT shrutkirtimishra detectionofhelicobacterpyloriinstoolspecimenscomparativeevaluationofnestedpcrandantigendetection
AT varshasingh detectionofhelicobacterpyloriinstoolspecimenscomparativeevaluationofnestedpcrandantigendetection
AT grkoteswarrao detectionofhelicobacterpyloriinstoolspecimenscomparativeevaluationofnestedpcrandantigendetection
AT ashokkumarjain detectionofhelicobacterpyloriinstoolspecimenscomparativeevaluationofnestedpcrandantigendetection
AT vinodkumardixit detectionofhelicobacterpyloriinstoolspecimenscomparativeevaluationofnestedpcrandantigendetection
AT anilkumargulati detectionofhelicobacterpyloriinstoolspecimenscomparativeevaluationofnestedpcrandantigendetection
AT gopalnath detectionofhelicobacterpyloriinstoolspecimenscomparativeevaluationofnestedpcrandantigendetection