Caesarean section or vaginal delivery for low-risk pregnancy? Helping women make an informed choice in low- and middle-income countries.

Women's fear and uncertainty about vaginal delivery and lack of empowerment in decision-making generate decision conflict and is one of the main determinants of high caesarean section rates in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study aims to develop a decision analysis tool (DAT) to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexandre Dumont, Myriam de Loenzien, Hung Mac Quo Nhu, Marylène Dugas, Charles Kabore, Pisake Lumbiganon, Maria Regina Torloni, Celina Gialdini, Guillermo Carroli, Claudia Hanson, Ana Pilar Betrán, QUALI-DEC consortium
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2022-01-01
Series:PLOS Global Public Health
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001264
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849337118731534336
author Alexandre Dumont
Myriam de Loenzien
Hung Mac Quo Nhu
Marylène Dugas
Charles Kabore
Pisake Lumbiganon
Maria Regina Torloni
Celina Gialdini
Guillermo Carroli
Claudia Hanson
Ana Pilar Betrán
QUALI-DEC consortium
author_facet Alexandre Dumont
Myriam de Loenzien
Hung Mac Quo Nhu
Marylène Dugas
Charles Kabore
Pisake Lumbiganon
Maria Regina Torloni
Celina Gialdini
Guillermo Carroli
Claudia Hanson
Ana Pilar Betrán
QUALI-DEC consortium
author_sort Alexandre Dumont
collection DOAJ
description Women's fear and uncertainty about vaginal delivery and lack of empowerment in decision-making generate decision conflict and is one of the main determinants of high caesarean section rates in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study aims to develop a decision analysis tool (DAT) to help pregnant women make an informed choice about the planned mode of delivery and to evaluate its acceptability in Vietnam, Thailand, Argentina, and Burkina Faso. The DAT targets low-risk pregnant women with a healthy, singleton foetus, without any medical or obstetric disorder, no previous caesarean scarring, and eligibility for labour trials. We conducted a systematic review to determine the short- and long-term maternal and offspring risks and benefits of planned caesarean section compared to planned vaginal delivery. We carried out individual interviews and focus group discussions with key informants to capture informational needs for decision-making, and to assess the acceptability of the DAT in participating hospitals. The DAT meets 20 of the 22 Patient Decision Aid Standards for decision support. It includes low- to moderate-certainty evidence-based information on the risks and benefits of both modes of birth, and helps pregnant women clarify their personal values. It has been well accepted by women and health care providers. Adaptations have been made in each country to fit the context and to facilitate its implementation in current practice, including the development of an App. DAT is a simple method to improve communication and facilitate shared decision-making for planned modes of birth. It is expected to build trust and foster more effective, satisfactory dialogue between pregnant women and providers. It can be easily adapted and updated as new evidence emerges. We encourage further studies in LMICs to assess the impact of DAT on quality decision-making for the appropriate use of caesarean section in these settings.
format Article
id doaj-art-204413d865ef4e5cb4cf96ceac4406a3
institution Kabale University
issn 2767-3375
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLOS Global Public Health
spelling doaj-art-204413d865ef4e5cb4cf96ceac4406a32025-08-20T03:44:47ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLOS Global Public Health2767-33752022-01-01211e000126410.1371/journal.pgph.0001264Caesarean section or vaginal delivery for low-risk pregnancy? Helping women make an informed choice in low- and middle-income countries.Alexandre DumontMyriam de LoenzienHung Mac Quo NhuMarylène DugasCharles KaborePisake LumbiganonMaria Regina TorloniCelina GialdiniGuillermo CarroliClaudia HansonAna Pilar BetránQUALI-DEC consortiumWomen's fear and uncertainty about vaginal delivery and lack of empowerment in decision-making generate decision conflict and is one of the main determinants of high caesarean section rates in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study aims to develop a decision analysis tool (DAT) to help pregnant women make an informed choice about the planned mode of delivery and to evaluate its acceptability in Vietnam, Thailand, Argentina, and Burkina Faso. The DAT targets low-risk pregnant women with a healthy, singleton foetus, without any medical or obstetric disorder, no previous caesarean scarring, and eligibility for labour trials. We conducted a systematic review to determine the short- and long-term maternal and offspring risks and benefits of planned caesarean section compared to planned vaginal delivery. We carried out individual interviews and focus group discussions with key informants to capture informational needs for decision-making, and to assess the acceptability of the DAT in participating hospitals. The DAT meets 20 of the 22 Patient Decision Aid Standards for decision support. It includes low- to moderate-certainty evidence-based information on the risks and benefits of both modes of birth, and helps pregnant women clarify their personal values. It has been well accepted by women and health care providers. Adaptations have been made in each country to fit the context and to facilitate its implementation in current practice, including the development of an App. DAT is a simple method to improve communication and facilitate shared decision-making for planned modes of birth. It is expected to build trust and foster more effective, satisfactory dialogue between pregnant women and providers. It can be easily adapted and updated as new evidence emerges. We encourage further studies in LMICs to assess the impact of DAT on quality decision-making for the appropriate use of caesarean section in these settings.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001264
spellingShingle Alexandre Dumont
Myriam de Loenzien
Hung Mac Quo Nhu
Marylène Dugas
Charles Kabore
Pisake Lumbiganon
Maria Regina Torloni
Celina Gialdini
Guillermo Carroli
Claudia Hanson
Ana Pilar Betrán
QUALI-DEC consortium
Caesarean section or vaginal delivery for low-risk pregnancy? Helping women make an informed choice in low- and middle-income countries.
PLOS Global Public Health
title Caesarean section or vaginal delivery for low-risk pregnancy? Helping women make an informed choice in low- and middle-income countries.
title_full Caesarean section or vaginal delivery for low-risk pregnancy? Helping women make an informed choice in low- and middle-income countries.
title_fullStr Caesarean section or vaginal delivery for low-risk pregnancy? Helping women make an informed choice in low- and middle-income countries.
title_full_unstemmed Caesarean section or vaginal delivery for low-risk pregnancy? Helping women make an informed choice in low- and middle-income countries.
title_short Caesarean section or vaginal delivery for low-risk pregnancy? Helping women make an informed choice in low- and middle-income countries.
title_sort caesarean section or vaginal delivery for low risk pregnancy helping women make an informed choice in low and middle income countries
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001264
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandredumont caesareansectionorvaginaldeliveryforlowriskpregnancyhelpingwomenmakeaninformedchoiceinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT myriamdeloenzien caesareansectionorvaginaldeliveryforlowriskpregnancyhelpingwomenmakeaninformedchoiceinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT hungmacquonhu caesareansectionorvaginaldeliveryforlowriskpregnancyhelpingwomenmakeaninformedchoiceinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT marylenedugas caesareansectionorvaginaldeliveryforlowriskpregnancyhelpingwomenmakeaninformedchoiceinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT charleskabore caesareansectionorvaginaldeliveryforlowriskpregnancyhelpingwomenmakeaninformedchoiceinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT pisakelumbiganon caesareansectionorvaginaldeliveryforlowriskpregnancyhelpingwomenmakeaninformedchoiceinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT mariareginatorloni caesareansectionorvaginaldeliveryforlowriskpregnancyhelpingwomenmakeaninformedchoiceinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT celinagialdini caesareansectionorvaginaldeliveryforlowriskpregnancyhelpingwomenmakeaninformedchoiceinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT guillermocarroli caesareansectionorvaginaldeliveryforlowriskpregnancyhelpingwomenmakeaninformedchoiceinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT claudiahanson caesareansectionorvaginaldeliveryforlowriskpregnancyhelpingwomenmakeaninformedchoiceinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT anapilarbetran caesareansectionorvaginaldeliveryforlowriskpregnancyhelpingwomenmakeaninformedchoiceinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT qualidecconsortium caesareansectionorvaginaldeliveryforlowriskpregnancyhelpingwomenmakeaninformedchoiceinlowandmiddleincomecountries