Trade opportunities within MIKTA: A Macroeconomic comparative analysis between Mexico, Indonesia and Turkey (2000-2019)
This paper aims at exploring trade opportunities between Mexico, Indonesia, and Turkey, presently members of MIKTA, by comparing their respective Macroeconomic and socio-economic variables. We use the GDP per capita as a key indicator of productivity and market size to see which MIKTA members are s...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
2020-07-01
|
| Series: | Norteamérica |
| Online Access: | https://www.revistanorteamerica.unam.mx/index.php/nam/article/view/431 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850035201507328000 |
|---|---|
| author | Gerardo Reyes Guzmán Marco Antonio Escobar Acevedo Perla Esperanza Rostro Hernández Damaris León Pérez |
| author_facet | Gerardo Reyes Guzmán Marco Antonio Escobar Acevedo Perla Esperanza Rostro Hernández Damaris León Pérez |
| author_sort | Gerardo Reyes Guzmán |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
This paper aims at exploring trade opportunities between Mexico, Indonesia, and Turkey, presently members of MIKTA, by comparing their respective Macroeconomic and socio-economic variables. We use the GDP per capita as a key indicator of productivity and market size to see which MIKTA members are similar and therefore have a potential to set trade and business projects among them. To do that we conducted an ANOVA test and skiped Australia and South Korea of the analysis due to their high income per capita. We then focused on Mexico, Indonesia, and Turkey, whose economies proved to be equivalent and compared their key macroeconomic and social indicators, outstanding their most competitive sectors, commodities, foreign trade, and trade partners. A total of 87 observations were rated from one to three to identify which country was better. Mexico scored 205 points followed by Indonesia with 164 and Turkey, 153 points. Finally, we ran a second ANOVA test, taking the value of all observations in a logarithmic scale to prove that in spite of the different scores, the mean of the three countries was equal. The results are relevant as the three of them present a wide business scope to be exploited, which could allow them to lead the MIKTA in the coming decades.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-200792bfc95040968daa93dd19ac67a7 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 1870-3550 2448-7228 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2020-07-01 |
| publisher | Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Norteamérica |
| spelling | doaj-art-200792bfc95040968daa93dd19ac67a72025-08-20T02:57:33ZengUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoNorteamérica1870-35502448-72282020-07-0115210.22201/cisan.24487228e.2020.2.431Trade opportunities within MIKTA: A Macroeconomic comparative analysis between Mexico, Indonesia and Turkey (2000-2019)Gerardo Reyes Guzmán0Marco Antonio Escobar Acevedo1Perla Esperanza Rostro Hernández2Damaris León Pérez3Universidad DelaSalle Bajío, Campus Salamanca, GtoUniversidad DelaSalle Bajío, Campus Salamanca, GtoFacultad de Negocios de la Universidad DelaSalle Bajío, Campus SalamancaUniversidad DelaSalle Bajío, Campus Salamanca, Gto This paper aims at exploring trade opportunities between Mexico, Indonesia, and Turkey, presently members of MIKTA, by comparing their respective Macroeconomic and socio-economic variables. We use the GDP per capita as a key indicator of productivity and market size to see which MIKTA members are similar and therefore have a potential to set trade and business projects among them. To do that we conducted an ANOVA test and skiped Australia and South Korea of the analysis due to their high income per capita. We then focused on Mexico, Indonesia, and Turkey, whose economies proved to be equivalent and compared their key macroeconomic and social indicators, outstanding their most competitive sectors, commodities, foreign trade, and trade partners. A total of 87 observations were rated from one to three to identify which country was better. Mexico scored 205 points followed by Indonesia with 164 and Turkey, 153 points. Finally, we ran a second ANOVA test, taking the value of all observations in a logarithmic scale to prove that in spite of the different scores, the mean of the three countries was equal. The results are relevant as the three of them present a wide business scope to be exploited, which could allow them to lead the MIKTA in the coming decades. https://www.revistanorteamerica.unam.mx/index.php/nam/article/view/431 |
| spellingShingle | Gerardo Reyes Guzmán Marco Antonio Escobar Acevedo Perla Esperanza Rostro Hernández Damaris León Pérez Trade opportunities within MIKTA: A Macroeconomic comparative analysis between Mexico, Indonesia and Turkey (2000-2019) Norteamérica |
| title | Trade opportunities within MIKTA: A Macroeconomic comparative analysis between Mexico, Indonesia and Turkey (2000-2019) |
| title_full | Trade opportunities within MIKTA: A Macroeconomic comparative analysis between Mexico, Indonesia and Turkey (2000-2019) |
| title_fullStr | Trade opportunities within MIKTA: A Macroeconomic comparative analysis between Mexico, Indonesia and Turkey (2000-2019) |
| title_full_unstemmed | Trade opportunities within MIKTA: A Macroeconomic comparative analysis between Mexico, Indonesia and Turkey (2000-2019) |
| title_short | Trade opportunities within MIKTA: A Macroeconomic comparative analysis between Mexico, Indonesia and Turkey (2000-2019) |
| title_sort | trade opportunities within mikta a macroeconomic comparative analysis between mexico indonesia and turkey 2000 2019 |
| url | https://www.revistanorteamerica.unam.mx/index.php/nam/article/view/431 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gerardoreyesguzman tradeopportunitieswithinmiktaamacroeconomiccomparativeanalysisbetweenmexicoindonesiaandturkey20002019 AT marcoantonioescobaracevedo tradeopportunitieswithinmiktaamacroeconomiccomparativeanalysisbetweenmexicoindonesiaandturkey20002019 AT perlaesperanzarostrohernandez tradeopportunitieswithinmiktaamacroeconomiccomparativeanalysisbetweenmexicoindonesiaandturkey20002019 AT damarisleonperez tradeopportunitieswithinmiktaamacroeconomiccomparativeanalysisbetweenmexicoindonesiaandturkey20002019 |