Experimental Study on The Capacity Of Z-Brace and X-Brace Cold-Formed Steel Wall Panel
Awaludin et al. created an anti-earthquake temporary shelter called RISBARI (Rumah Instan Baja Ringan/Light Steel Instant House), featuring an X-shaped strap-braced wall system using cold-formed steel as its primary structure. A similar temporary shelter (hunian sementara/huntara) was developed by B...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universitas Negeri Semarang
2023-10-01
|
| Series: | Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Perencanaan |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jtsp/article/view/46357 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850246681441861632 |
|---|---|
| author | Khristia Ningsih Cantikawati Nindyawati Nindyawati Roro Sulaksitaningrum |
| author_facet | Khristia Ningsih Cantikawati Nindyawati Nindyawati Roro Sulaksitaningrum |
| author_sort | Khristia Ningsih Cantikawati |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Awaludin et al. created an anti-earthquake temporary shelter called RISBARI (Rumah Instan Baja Ringan/Light Steel Instant House), featuring an X-shaped strap-braced wall system using cold-formed steel as its primary structure. A similar temporary shelter (hunian sementara/huntara) was developed by Biru Bumi Hijau using Z-shaped wall bracing. While experimental research on the lateral strength of cold-formed steel wall panels with X-brace bracing, such as in RISBARI, has been conducted extensively, there has been limited in-depth study on Biru Bumi Hijau's huntara. Hence, this research aimed to identify the load capacity, stiffness, and ductility of both bracing configurations on lateral strength using cold-formed steel wall panels. This study used an experimental method through the monotonic static load in the laboratory. The test results were analyzed with One-way ANOVA. The load capacity, stiffness, and ductility of the X-brace panel increased by 201%, 4452%, and 105%, respectively. In contrast, the load capacity, stiffness, and ductility of the Z-brace panel increased by 201%, 4253%, and 156%. The bracing capacity on both was not directly proportional since both test objects had different configuration structures, although they had equalized length and width. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-1fffceb4e2a54b899f814b594942c4e5 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1411-1772 2503-1899 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-10-01 |
| publisher | Universitas Negeri Semarang |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Perencanaan |
| spelling | doaj-art-1fffceb4e2a54b899f814b594942c4e52025-08-20T01:59:08ZengUniversitas Negeri SemarangJurnal Teknik Sipil dan Perencanaan1411-17722503-18992023-10-0125219019810.15294/jtsp.v25i2.4635714416Experimental Study on The Capacity Of Z-Brace and X-Brace Cold-Formed Steel Wall PanelKhristia Ningsih Cantikawati0Nindyawati Nindyawati1Roro Sulaksitaningrum2Universitas Negeri MalangUniversitas Negeri MalangUniversitas Negeri MalangAwaludin et al. created an anti-earthquake temporary shelter called RISBARI (Rumah Instan Baja Ringan/Light Steel Instant House), featuring an X-shaped strap-braced wall system using cold-formed steel as its primary structure. A similar temporary shelter (hunian sementara/huntara) was developed by Biru Bumi Hijau using Z-shaped wall bracing. While experimental research on the lateral strength of cold-formed steel wall panels with X-brace bracing, such as in RISBARI, has been conducted extensively, there has been limited in-depth study on Biru Bumi Hijau's huntara. Hence, this research aimed to identify the load capacity, stiffness, and ductility of both bracing configurations on lateral strength using cold-formed steel wall panels. This study used an experimental method through the monotonic static load in the laboratory. The test results were analyzed with One-way ANOVA. The load capacity, stiffness, and ductility of the X-brace panel increased by 201%, 4452%, and 105%, respectively. In contrast, the load capacity, stiffness, and ductility of the Z-brace panel increased by 201%, 4253%, and 156%. The bracing capacity on both was not directly proportional since both test objects had different configuration structures, although they had equalized length and width.https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jtsp/article/view/46357lateral strengthcold rolled steel panelx-bracez-bracestatic monotonic |
| spellingShingle | Khristia Ningsih Cantikawati Nindyawati Nindyawati Roro Sulaksitaningrum Experimental Study on The Capacity Of Z-Brace and X-Brace Cold-Formed Steel Wall Panel Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Perencanaan lateral strength cold rolled steel panel x-brace z-brace static monotonic |
| title | Experimental Study on The Capacity Of Z-Brace and X-Brace Cold-Formed Steel Wall Panel |
| title_full | Experimental Study on The Capacity Of Z-Brace and X-Brace Cold-Formed Steel Wall Panel |
| title_fullStr | Experimental Study on The Capacity Of Z-Brace and X-Brace Cold-Formed Steel Wall Panel |
| title_full_unstemmed | Experimental Study on The Capacity Of Z-Brace and X-Brace Cold-Formed Steel Wall Panel |
| title_short | Experimental Study on The Capacity Of Z-Brace and X-Brace Cold-Formed Steel Wall Panel |
| title_sort | experimental study on the capacity of z brace and x brace cold formed steel wall panel |
| topic | lateral strength cold rolled steel panel x-brace z-brace static monotonic |
| url | https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jtsp/article/view/46357 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT khristianingsihcantikawati experimentalstudyonthecapacityofzbraceandxbracecoldformedsteelwallpanel AT nindyawatinindyawati experimentalstudyonthecapacityofzbraceandxbracecoldformedsteelwallpanel AT rorosulaksitaningrum experimentalstudyonthecapacityofzbraceandxbracecoldformedsteelwallpanel |