Clinimetrics of the 9- and 19-Item Wearing-Off Questionnaire: A Systematic Review

The treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD) with dopaminergic therapy improves functionality and quality of life. However, as the disease progresses, the wearing-off phenomenon develops, which necessitates complex posology adjustment or adjuvant therapy. This phenomenon may not be well recognized, esp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carlos E. Mantese, Artur Schumacher-Schuh, Carlos R. M. Rieder
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-01-01
Series:Parkinson's Disease
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5308491
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832566882820947968
author Carlos E. Mantese
Artur Schumacher-Schuh
Carlos R. M. Rieder
author_facet Carlos E. Mantese
Artur Schumacher-Schuh
Carlos R. M. Rieder
author_sort Carlos E. Mantese
collection DOAJ
description The treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD) with dopaminergic therapy improves functionality and quality of life. However, as the disease progresses, the wearing-off phenomenon develops, which necessitates complex posology adjustment or adjuvant therapy. This phenomenon may not be well recognized, especially if it is mild or involves nonmotor symptoms. Questionnaires were developed to improve the recognition of the wearing-off phenomenon. The questionnaires consist of a list of symptoms that patients must check if they have and if the symptoms improve with medication. A recent review by the Movement Disorder Society suggested the 19-item (WOQ-19) and 9-item (WOQ-9) questionnaires as screening tools for the wearing-off phenomenon. However, there has not been a systematic review to assess the questionnaires’ clinimetric properties, such as sensitivity, specificity, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness. We conducted an extensive search for studies using these two tools. We identified 3 studies using WOQ-19 and 5 studies using WOQ-9. Both questionnaires seem to have good sensitivity (0.81–1). WOQ-19 has variable specificity (0.39–0.8), depending on the number of positive items, while WOQ-9 lacks specificity (0.1–0.69). Only one study using WOQ-19 reported test-retest, and only two studies reported responsiveness. Thus, this report describes the first independent systematic review to exam quantitatively the clinimetric properties of these two questionnaires.
format Article
id doaj-art-1fea34b419894c328effb38b85e7ce95
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-8083
2042-0080
language English
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Parkinson's Disease
spelling doaj-art-1fea34b419894c328effb38b85e7ce952025-02-03T01:02:56ZengWileyParkinson's Disease2090-80832042-00802018-01-01201810.1155/2018/53084915308491Clinimetrics of the 9- and 19-Item Wearing-Off Questionnaire: A Systematic ReviewCarlos E. Mantese0Artur Schumacher-Schuh1Carlos R. M. Rieder2Postgraduate Program in Medical Sciences, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, BrazilPostgraduate Program in Medical Sciences, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, BrazilPostgraduate Program in Medical Sciences, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, BrazilThe treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD) with dopaminergic therapy improves functionality and quality of life. However, as the disease progresses, the wearing-off phenomenon develops, which necessitates complex posology adjustment or adjuvant therapy. This phenomenon may not be well recognized, especially if it is mild or involves nonmotor symptoms. Questionnaires were developed to improve the recognition of the wearing-off phenomenon. The questionnaires consist of a list of symptoms that patients must check if they have and if the symptoms improve with medication. A recent review by the Movement Disorder Society suggested the 19-item (WOQ-19) and 9-item (WOQ-9) questionnaires as screening tools for the wearing-off phenomenon. However, there has not been a systematic review to assess the questionnaires’ clinimetric properties, such as sensitivity, specificity, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness. We conducted an extensive search for studies using these two tools. We identified 3 studies using WOQ-19 and 5 studies using WOQ-9. Both questionnaires seem to have good sensitivity (0.81–1). WOQ-19 has variable specificity (0.39–0.8), depending on the number of positive items, while WOQ-9 lacks specificity (0.1–0.69). Only one study using WOQ-19 reported test-retest, and only two studies reported responsiveness. Thus, this report describes the first independent systematic review to exam quantitatively the clinimetric properties of these two questionnaires.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5308491
spellingShingle Carlos E. Mantese
Artur Schumacher-Schuh
Carlos R. M. Rieder
Clinimetrics of the 9- and 19-Item Wearing-Off Questionnaire: A Systematic Review
Parkinson's Disease
title Clinimetrics of the 9- and 19-Item Wearing-Off Questionnaire: A Systematic Review
title_full Clinimetrics of the 9- and 19-Item Wearing-Off Questionnaire: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Clinimetrics of the 9- and 19-Item Wearing-Off Questionnaire: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Clinimetrics of the 9- and 19-Item Wearing-Off Questionnaire: A Systematic Review
title_short Clinimetrics of the 9- and 19-Item Wearing-Off Questionnaire: A Systematic Review
title_sort clinimetrics of the 9 and 19 item wearing off questionnaire a systematic review
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5308491
work_keys_str_mv AT carlosemantese clinimetricsofthe9and19itemwearingoffquestionnaireasystematicreview
AT arturschumacherschuh clinimetricsofthe9and19itemwearingoffquestionnaireasystematicreview
AT carlosrmrieder clinimetricsofthe9and19itemwearingoffquestionnaireasystematicreview