The privacy role of information intermediaries through self-regulation

Through qualitative analysis of the policies of two major global information intermediaries — Google and Microsoft — and related case studies, this paper demonstrates a) that intermediaries’ participation in self-regulatory programmes and implementation of privacy principles does not necessarily tra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tatevik Sargsyan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society 2016-12-01
Series:Internet Policy Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://policyreview.info/node/438
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850232343209443328
author Tatevik Sargsyan
author_facet Tatevik Sargsyan
author_sort Tatevik Sargsyan
collection DOAJ
description Through qualitative analysis of the policies of two major global information intermediaries — Google and Microsoft — and related case studies, this paper demonstrates a) that intermediaries’ participation in self-regulatory programmes and implementation of privacy principles does not necessarily translate into meaningful privacy safeguards for users in the face of growing private surveillance capacity; and b) that within the EU and US self-regulatory frameworks, information intermediaries have discretionary power to set their policies and practices prioritising strategic interests over privacy commitments. Discussions in this paper complement existing studies on the implementation of privacy principles stipulated in Fair Information Practices (FIPs) by enhancing understanding about the role of information intermediaries in defining privacy conditions of users within self-regulation.
format Article
id doaj-art-1f99754d509444d6bdd2b2515b89fcdb
institution OA Journals
issn 2197-6775
language English
publishDate 2016-12-01
publisher Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society
record_format Article
series Internet Policy Review
spelling doaj-art-1f99754d509444d6bdd2b2515b89fcdb2025-08-20T02:03:14ZengAlexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and SocietyInternet Policy Review2197-67752016-12-015410.14763/2016.4.438The privacy role of information intermediaries through self-regulationTatevik Sargsyan0American UniversityThrough qualitative analysis of the policies of two major global information intermediaries — Google and Microsoft — and related case studies, this paper demonstrates a) that intermediaries’ participation in self-regulatory programmes and implementation of privacy principles does not necessarily translate into meaningful privacy safeguards for users in the face of growing private surveillance capacity; and b) that within the EU and US self-regulatory frameworks, information intermediaries have discretionary power to set their policies and practices prioritising strategic interests over privacy commitments. Discussions in this paper complement existing studies on the implementation of privacy principles stipulated in Fair Information Practices (FIPs) by enhancing understanding about the role of information intermediaries in defining privacy conditions of users within self-regulation.https://policyreview.info/node/438PrivacyIntermediariesPlatformsSelf-regulationFair Information PracticesTerms of Service (TOS)
spellingShingle Tatevik Sargsyan
The privacy role of information intermediaries through self-regulation
Internet Policy Review
Privacy
Intermediaries
Platforms
Self-regulation
Fair Information Practices
Terms of Service (TOS)
title The privacy role of information intermediaries through self-regulation
title_full The privacy role of information intermediaries through self-regulation
title_fullStr The privacy role of information intermediaries through self-regulation
title_full_unstemmed The privacy role of information intermediaries through self-regulation
title_short The privacy role of information intermediaries through self-regulation
title_sort privacy role of information intermediaries through self regulation
topic Privacy
Intermediaries
Platforms
Self-regulation
Fair Information Practices
Terms of Service (TOS)
url https://policyreview.info/node/438
work_keys_str_mv AT tateviksargsyan theprivacyroleofinformationintermediariesthroughselfregulation
AT tateviksargsyan privacyroleofinformationintermediariesthroughselfregulation