An Examination of Water‐Related Melt Processes in Arctic Snow on Tundra and Sea‐Ice

Abstract From April through June in 2019 and 2022, we monitored snow melt at three sites near Utqiaġvik, Alaska. Along 200‐m lines we measured snow depth, density, stratigraphy, snow‐covered area, and spectral albedo. Site 1 (ARM) was sloped tundra drained by water tracks. Site 2 (BEO) was flat poly...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anika Pinzner, Matthew Sturm, Jennifer S. Delamere, Andrew R. Mahoney
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-01-01
Series:Water Resources Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR033440
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract From April through June in 2019 and 2022, we monitored snow melt at three sites near Utqiaġvik, Alaska. Along 200‐m lines we measured snow depth, density, stratigraphy, snow‐covered area, and spectral albedo. Site 1 (ARM) was sloped tundra drained by water tracks. Site 2 (BEO) was flat polygonal tundra. Site 3 (ICE) was on undeformed landfast sea ice. All three sites were within a 6 km radius. Despite similar pre‐melt snow distributions and weather, the melt progression differed markedly between sites. In 2019, by mid‐melt, there was 40% less snow‐covered area at ARM versus ICE, and 34% less snow‐covered area at ARM versus BEO. The 2022 melt started 2 weeks later than in 2019 and was rapid, so smaller differences in snow‐covered areas developed. In both years meltout dates varied by up to 25 days between sites, and more than 20 days within sites, with melt rates at locations only meters apart differing by up to a factor of seven. This melt diachroneity led to highly heterogeneous meltout patterns at all three sites. Our measurements and observations indicate that, in addition to reductions in snow reflective properties and wind‐driven heat advection, the fate of meltwater plays a key role in producing melt diachroneity. We identify seven snow‐water mechanisms that can enhance or inhibit melt rates, all largely controlled by the local topography and the nature of the substrate. These mechanisms are important because the most rapid changes in albedo coincide with the peak of water‐snow melt interactions.
ISSN:0043-1397
1944-7973