Understanding physical activity participation among underserved women: a mixed-methods cross sectional study using an ecological framework

Abstract Background Physical inactivity remains a major contributor to non-communicable diseases and health inequalities in the UK, particularly among underserved women living in socioeconomically deprived areas. In post-industrial port communities across Suffolk and Norfolk such as Ipswich, Lowesto...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jude Ominyi, Andrew Clifton, Aaron Nwedu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-07-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-23189-y
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849238203337277440
author Jude Ominyi
Andrew Clifton
Aaron Nwedu
author_facet Jude Ominyi
Andrew Clifton
Aaron Nwedu
author_sort Jude Ominyi
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Physical inactivity remains a major contributor to non-communicable diseases and health inequalities in the UK, particularly among underserved women living in socioeconomically deprived areas. In post-industrial port communities across Suffolk and Norfolk such as Ipswich, Lowestoft, Great Yarmouth, and Felixstowe, women face intersecting barriers to physical activity (PA), including gender norms, ethnicity, chronic illness, caregiving duties, and limited access to affordable, culturally appropriate PA opportunities. This study addresses a critical evidence gap by exploring multi-level influences on PA engagement among these populations using an ecological and intersectional lens. Methods A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was employed, guided by Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems Theory. Quantitative data were collected using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF) and the Exercise Benefits and Barriers Scale (EBBS), administered to 112 women aged 18–65 recruited from community-based PA and weight-loss programmes. Embedded within the survey were open-ended prompts capturing lived experiences. Data were analysed using SPSS v29 for t-tests, chi-square tests, and logistic regression, while qualitative data underwent thematic analysis using NVivo 14. Findings were integrated across five ecological levels: microsystem, mesosystem, exosystem, macrosystem, and chronosystem. Results Only 58% of participants met recommended PA guidelines. Key barriers included chronic health conditions (Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.50), caregiving responsibilities (OR = 0.56), low self-confidence (OR = 0.49), and cost (OR = 0.59). Qualitative findings revealed intersecting challenges, such as cultural expectations, modesty norms, family criticism, lack of safe infrastructure, and inconsistent PA programme availability. Divergences between high EBBS benefit scores and narratives of demotivation highlighted emotional dissonance and structural constraints. Temporal factors like motherhood, menopause, and community service cuts also disrupted sustained engagement. Conclusion Women’s PA behaviours in these areas are shaped by a complex interplay of individual, social, structural, cultural, and temporal factors. One-size-fits-all behavioural messaging is insufficient. Effective interventions must be inclusive, culturally sensitive, and rooted in local realities. This study offers a robust foundation for designing equity-focused, multi-level strategies to promote PA in underserved communities.
format Article
id doaj-art-1f8c554dbb004d518fcdfbec77f68242
institution Kabale University
issn 1471-2458
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Public Health
spelling doaj-art-1f8c554dbb004d518fcdfbec77f682422025-08-20T04:01:42ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582025-07-0125112310.1186/s12889-025-23189-yUnderstanding physical activity participation among underserved women: a mixed-methods cross sectional study using an ecological frameworkJude Ominyi0Andrew Clifton1Aaron Nwedu2School of Nursing, Midwifery & Public Health, University of SuffolkSchool of Nursing, Midwifery & Public Health, University of SuffolkSenior Lecturer, Federal University of Health SciencesAbstract Background Physical inactivity remains a major contributor to non-communicable diseases and health inequalities in the UK, particularly among underserved women living in socioeconomically deprived areas. In post-industrial port communities across Suffolk and Norfolk such as Ipswich, Lowestoft, Great Yarmouth, and Felixstowe, women face intersecting barriers to physical activity (PA), including gender norms, ethnicity, chronic illness, caregiving duties, and limited access to affordable, culturally appropriate PA opportunities. This study addresses a critical evidence gap by exploring multi-level influences on PA engagement among these populations using an ecological and intersectional lens. Methods A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was employed, guided by Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems Theory. Quantitative data were collected using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF) and the Exercise Benefits and Barriers Scale (EBBS), administered to 112 women aged 18–65 recruited from community-based PA and weight-loss programmes. Embedded within the survey were open-ended prompts capturing lived experiences. Data were analysed using SPSS v29 for t-tests, chi-square tests, and logistic regression, while qualitative data underwent thematic analysis using NVivo 14. Findings were integrated across five ecological levels: microsystem, mesosystem, exosystem, macrosystem, and chronosystem. Results Only 58% of participants met recommended PA guidelines. Key barriers included chronic health conditions (Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.50), caregiving responsibilities (OR = 0.56), low self-confidence (OR = 0.49), and cost (OR = 0.59). Qualitative findings revealed intersecting challenges, such as cultural expectations, modesty norms, family criticism, lack of safe infrastructure, and inconsistent PA programme availability. Divergences between high EBBS benefit scores and narratives of demotivation highlighted emotional dissonance and structural constraints. Temporal factors like motherhood, menopause, and community service cuts also disrupted sustained engagement. Conclusion Women’s PA behaviours in these areas are shaped by a complex interplay of individual, social, structural, cultural, and temporal factors. One-size-fits-all behavioural messaging is insufficient. Effective interventions must be inclusive, culturally sensitive, and rooted in local realities. This study offers a robust foundation for designing equity-focused, multi-level strategies to promote PA in underserved communities.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-23189-yPhysical activityUnderserved womenEcological systems theoryCoastal communitiesHealth inequalitiesMixed methods
spellingShingle Jude Ominyi
Andrew Clifton
Aaron Nwedu
Understanding physical activity participation among underserved women: a mixed-methods cross sectional study using an ecological framework
BMC Public Health
Physical activity
Underserved women
Ecological systems theory
Coastal communities
Health inequalities
Mixed methods
title Understanding physical activity participation among underserved women: a mixed-methods cross sectional study using an ecological framework
title_full Understanding physical activity participation among underserved women: a mixed-methods cross sectional study using an ecological framework
title_fullStr Understanding physical activity participation among underserved women: a mixed-methods cross sectional study using an ecological framework
title_full_unstemmed Understanding physical activity participation among underserved women: a mixed-methods cross sectional study using an ecological framework
title_short Understanding physical activity participation among underserved women: a mixed-methods cross sectional study using an ecological framework
title_sort understanding physical activity participation among underserved women a mixed methods cross sectional study using an ecological framework
topic Physical activity
Underserved women
Ecological systems theory
Coastal communities
Health inequalities
Mixed methods
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-23189-y
work_keys_str_mv AT judeominyi understandingphysicalactivityparticipationamongunderservedwomenamixedmethodscrosssectionalstudyusinganecologicalframework
AT andrewclifton understandingphysicalactivityparticipationamongunderservedwomenamixedmethodscrosssectionalstudyusinganecologicalframework
AT aaronnwedu understandingphysicalactivityparticipationamongunderservedwomenamixedmethodscrosssectionalstudyusinganecologicalframework