The Relation between Morphology of Maxillary Sinus after Augmentation in Three Classification Methods and Residual Bone Height: A Retrospective Study

Maxillary sinus augmentation is critical to oral implantology, particularly in some cases. The morphology of the sinus floor reflects the lifting effect to a certain extent; however, there has been limited research on the morphology after sinus augmentation. The present study aims to investigate the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhi Wang, Qi Jia, Heng Bo Jiang, Jianmin Han, Lidong Zou, Guangliang Niu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:International Journal of Clinical Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1850012
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849307969386184704
author Zhi Wang
Qi Jia
Heng Bo Jiang
Jianmin Han
Lidong Zou
Guangliang Niu
author_facet Zhi Wang
Qi Jia
Heng Bo Jiang
Jianmin Han
Lidong Zou
Guangliang Niu
author_sort Zhi Wang
collection DOAJ
description Maxillary sinus augmentation is critical to oral implantology, particularly in some cases. The morphology of the sinus floor reflects the lifting effect to a certain extent; however, there has been limited research on the morphology after sinus augmentation. The present study aims to investigate the relationship between residual bone height (RBH) and the morphology of the sinus floor and determine whether a correlation exists between the different evaluation classifications. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation procedures were performed in 56 patients and 68 teeth using the sinus crest approach (SCA). Imaging results obtained after one year of sinus augmentation were analyzed and simultaneously classified along the coronal plane, the sagittal plane, and the biplane (coronal-sagittal). The higher the RBH, the closer the result tends to be to A, A’, or type 1 (more satisfactory). There was a significant correlation between the three different evaluation classifications (p<0.05). The morphology of perforation cases was involved in types C, D, C’, and D’. A more satisfactory post-lifting morphology (tent type and flat type) is probably related to an optimal preoperative bone height, and an unsatisfactory post-lifting morphology is related to a low preoperative sinus floor height. The sagittal plane evaluation correlates with the coronal plane and biplane evaluation and is thus more recommended.
format Article
id doaj-art-1f5a8583df044c6582eb7a044dcf586b
institution Kabale University
issn 1742-1241
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Clinical Practice
spelling doaj-art-1f5a8583df044c6582eb7a044dcf586b2025-08-20T03:54:36ZengWileyInternational Journal of Clinical Practice1742-12412022-01-01202210.1155/2022/1850012The Relation between Morphology of Maxillary Sinus after Augmentation in Three Classification Methods and Residual Bone Height: A Retrospective StudyZhi Wang0Qi Jia1Heng Bo Jiang2Jianmin Han3Lidong Zou4Guangliang Niu5Second Clinical DivisionDepartment of Dental MaterialsDepartment of Dental MaterialsDepartment of Dental MaterialsSecond Clinical DivisionDepartment of Oral ProsthodonticsMaxillary sinus augmentation is critical to oral implantology, particularly in some cases. The morphology of the sinus floor reflects the lifting effect to a certain extent; however, there has been limited research on the morphology after sinus augmentation. The present study aims to investigate the relationship between residual bone height (RBH) and the morphology of the sinus floor and determine whether a correlation exists between the different evaluation classifications. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation procedures were performed in 56 patients and 68 teeth using the sinus crest approach (SCA). Imaging results obtained after one year of sinus augmentation were analyzed and simultaneously classified along the coronal plane, the sagittal plane, and the biplane (coronal-sagittal). The higher the RBH, the closer the result tends to be to A, A’, or type 1 (more satisfactory). There was a significant correlation between the three different evaluation classifications (p<0.05). The morphology of perforation cases was involved in types C, D, C’, and D’. A more satisfactory post-lifting morphology (tent type and flat type) is probably related to an optimal preoperative bone height, and an unsatisfactory post-lifting morphology is related to a low preoperative sinus floor height. The sagittal plane evaluation correlates with the coronal plane and biplane evaluation and is thus more recommended.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1850012
spellingShingle Zhi Wang
Qi Jia
Heng Bo Jiang
Jianmin Han
Lidong Zou
Guangliang Niu
The Relation between Morphology of Maxillary Sinus after Augmentation in Three Classification Methods and Residual Bone Height: A Retrospective Study
International Journal of Clinical Practice
title The Relation between Morphology of Maxillary Sinus after Augmentation in Three Classification Methods and Residual Bone Height: A Retrospective Study
title_full The Relation between Morphology of Maxillary Sinus after Augmentation in Three Classification Methods and Residual Bone Height: A Retrospective Study
title_fullStr The Relation between Morphology of Maxillary Sinus after Augmentation in Three Classification Methods and Residual Bone Height: A Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed The Relation between Morphology of Maxillary Sinus after Augmentation in Three Classification Methods and Residual Bone Height: A Retrospective Study
title_short The Relation between Morphology of Maxillary Sinus after Augmentation in Three Classification Methods and Residual Bone Height: A Retrospective Study
title_sort relation between morphology of maxillary sinus after augmentation in three classification methods and residual bone height a retrospective study
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1850012
work_keys_str_mv AT zhiwang therelationbetweenmorphologyofmaxillarysinusafteraugmentationinthreeclassificationmethodsandresidualboneheightaretrospectivestudy
AT qijia therelationbetweenmorphologyofmaxillarysinusafteraugmentationinthreeclassificationmethodsandresidualboneheightaretrospectivestudy
AT hengbojiang therelationbetweenmorphologyofmaxillarysinusafteraugmentationinthreeclassificationmethodsandresidualboneheightaretrospectivestudy
AT jianminhan therelationbetweenmorphologyofmaxillarysinusafteraugmentationinthreeclassificationmethodsandresidualboneheightaretrospectivestudy
AT lidongzou therelationbetweenmorphologyofmaxillarysinusafteraugmentationinthreeclassificationmethodsandresidualboneheightaretrospectivestudy
AT guangliangniu therelationbetweenmorphologyofmaxillarysinusafteraugmentationinthreeclassificationmethodsandresidualboneheightaretrospectivestudy
AT zhiwang relationbetweenmorphologyofmaxillarysinusafteraugmentationinthreeclassificationmethodsandresidualboneheightaretrospectivestudy
AT qijia relationbetweenmorphologyofmaxillarysinusafteraugmentationinthreeclassificationmethodsandresidualboneheightaretrospectivestudy
AT hengbojiang relationbetweenmorphologyofmaxillarysinusafteraugmentationinthreeclassificationmethodsandresidualboneheightaretrospectivestudy
AT jianminhan relationbetweenmorphologyofmaxillarysinusafteraugmentationinthreeclassificationmethodsandresidualboneheightaretrospectivestudy
AT lidongzou relationbetweenmorphologyofmaxillarysinusafteraugmentationinthreeclassificationmethodsandresidualboneheightaretrospectivestudy
AT guangliangniu relationbetweenmorphologyofmaxillarysinusafteraugmentationinthreeclassificationmethodsandresidualboneheightaretrospectivestudy