Protocol to assess bottlenecks inhibiting the scaling up of evidence-based family planning practices in low-income and middle-income countries using mixed methods
Introduction Scaling up evidence-based practices (EBPs) in family planning (FP), as recommended by the WHO, has increasingly been accepted by global health actors as core to their mission, goals and activities. National policies, strategies, guidance, training materials, political commitment and don...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | BMJ Open |
| Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/12/e087191.full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841536233722871808 |
|---|---|
| author | James Kiarie Moazzam Ali Rita Kabra Komal Preet Allagh Kathryn Church Abdulmumin Saad Petrus Steyn |
| author_facet | James Kiarie Moazzam Ali Rita Kabra Komal Preet Allagh Kathryn Church Abdulmumin Saad Petrus Steyn |
| author_sort | James Kiarie |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Introduction Scaling up evidence-based practices (EBPs) in family planning (FP), as recommended by the WHO, has increasingly been accepted by global health actors as core to their mission, goals and activities. National policies, strategies, guidance, training materials, political commitment and donor support exist in many countries to adopt and scale up a range of EBPs, including postpregnancy FP, task sharing for FP and the promotion of social and behaviour change (SBC) for FP. While there has been some success in implementing these practices, coverage remains inadequate in many countries. To gain a better understanding of the factors that may be hindering the sustained scale-up of these interventions, WHO has developed an assessment protocol to systematically identify the health systems’ ‘bottlenecks’ to implementation and to then identify solutions and develop strategies to address them.Methods and analysis A mixed method approach that includes document review, secondary data analysis (from surveys, service delivery data and case studies) and key informant interviews with policymakers, programme managers, health providers and community groups will be used to identify bottlenecks. This will be followed by a workshop to prioritise bottlenecks and characterise their root causes. Finally, solutions for the root causes of prioritised bottlenecks will be proposed. The protocol is structured in a modular format, with separate modules on postpregnancy FP, task sharing and SBC. Assessment themes and questions are informed by a wide body of literature on the three programmatic components, as well as studies on health policy implementation and scale-up.Ethics and dissemination The protocol was exempt from ethical review by the WHO ethics committee. The findings of the bottleneck analysis will be presented at local, national and international conferences and disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and webinars. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-1f571a71118c474b988cc5e9937ebd52 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2044-6055 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMJ Open |
| spelling | doaj-art-1f571a71118c474b988cc5e9937ebd522025-01-14T19:40:10ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552024-12-01141210.1136/bmjopen-2024-087191Protocol to assess bottlenecks inhibiting the scaling up of evidence-based family planning practices in low-income and middle-income countries using mixed methodsJames Kiarie0Moazzam Ali1Rita Kabra2Komal Preet Allagh3Kathryn Church4Abdulmumin Saad5Petrus Steyn6Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, including UNDP/ UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/ World Bank Special programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland10 Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, SwitzerlandDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, including UNDP/ UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/ World Bank Special programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, World Health Organization, Geneva, SwitzerlandConsultant, Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland2 Independent Consultant, Geneva, Switzerland2 Independent Consultant, Geneva, Switzerland1 Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, SwitzerlandIntroduction Scaling up evidence-based practices (EBPs) in family planning (FP), as recommended by the WHO, has increasingly been accepted by global health actors as core to their mission, goals and activities. National policies, strategies, guidance, training materials, political commitment and donor support exist in many countries to adopt and scale up a range of EBPs, including postpregnancy FP, task sharing for FP and the promotion of social and behaviour change (SBC) for FP. While there has been some success in implementing these practices, coverage remains inadequate in many countries. To gain a better understanding of the factors that may be hindering the sustained scale-up of these interventions, WHO has developed an assessment protocol to systematically identify the health systems’ ‘bottlenecks’ to implementation and to then identify solutions and develop strategies to address them.Methods and analysis A mixed method approach that includes document review, secondary data analysis (from surveys, service delivery data and case studies) and key informant interviews with policymakers, programme managers, health providers and community groups will be used to identify bottlenecks. This will be followed by a workshop to prioritise bottlenecks and characterise their root causes. Finally, solutions for the root causes of prioritised bottlenecks will be proposed. The protocol is structured in a modular format, with separate modules on postpregnancy FP, task sharing and SBC. Assessment themes and questions are informed by a wide body of literature on the three programmatic components, as well as studies on health policy implementation and scale-up.Ethics and dissemination The protocol was exempt from ethical review by the WHO ethics committee. The findings of the bottleneck analysis will be presented at local, national and international conferences and disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and webinars.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/12/e087191.full |
| spellingShingle | James Kiarie Moazzam Ali Rita Kabra Komal Preet Allagh Kathryn Church Abdulmumin Saad Petrus Steyn Protocol to assess bottlenecks inhibiting the scaling up of evidence-based family planning practices in low-income and middle-income countries using mixed methods BMJ Open |
| title | Protocol to assess bottlenecks inhibiting the scaling up of evidence-based family planning practices in low-income and middle-income countries using mixed methods |
| title_full | Protocol to assess bottlenecks inhibiting the scaling up of evidence-based family planning practices in low-income and middle-income countries using mixed methods |
| title_fullStr | Protocol to assess bottlenecks inhibiting the scaling up of evidence-based family planning practices in low-income and middle-income countries using mixed methods |
| title_full_unstemmed | Protocol to assess bottlenecks inhibiting the scaling up of evidence-based family planning practices in low-income and middle-income countries using mixed methods |
| title_short | Protocol to assess bottlenecks inhibiting the scaling up of evidence-based family planning practices in low-income and middle-income countries using mixed methods |
| title_sort | protocol to assess bottlenecks inhibiting the scaling up of evidence based family planning practices in low income and middle income countries using mixed methods |
| url | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/12/e087191.full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jameskiarie protocoltoassessbottlenecksinhibitingthescalingupofevidencebasedfamilyplanningpracticesinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesusingmixedmethods AT moazzamali protocoltoassessbottlenecksinhibitingthescalingupofevidencebasedfamilyplanningpracticesinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesusingmixedmethods AT ritakabra protocoltoassessbottlenecksinhibitingthescalingupofevidencebasedfamilyplanningpracticesinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesusingmixedmethods AT komalpreetallagh protocoltoassessbottlenecksinhibitingthescalingupofevidencebasedfamilyplanningpracticesinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesusingmixedmethods AT kathrynchurch protocoltoassessbottlenecksinhibitingthescalingupofevidencebasedfamilyplanningpracticesinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesusingmixedmethods AT abdulmuminsaad protocoltoassessbottlenecksinhibitingthescalingupofevidencebasedfamilyplanningpracticesinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesusingmixedmethods AT petrussteyn protocoltoassessbottlenecksinhibitingthescalingupofevidencebasedfamilyplanningpracticesinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesusingmixedmethods |