Strong connectivity to the sensorimotor cortex predicts clinical effectiveness of thalamic deep brain stimulation in essential tremor

Introduction: The outcome of thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) for essential tremor (ET) varies, probably due to the difficulty in identifying the optimal target for DBS placement. Recent approaches compared the clinical response with a connectivity-based segmentation of the target area. However...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: F. Grimm, M. Walcker, L. Milosevic, G. Naros, B. Bender, D. Weiss, A. Gharabaghi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-01-01
Series:NeuroImage: Clinical
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158224001505
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850222482403885056
author F. Grimm
M. Walcker
L. Milosevic
G. Naros
B. Bender
D. Weiss
A. Gharabaghi
author_facet F. Grimm
M. Walcker
L. Milosevic
G. Naros
B. Bender
D. Weiss
A. Gharabaghi
author_sort F. Grimm
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: The outcome of thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) for essential tremor (ET) varies, probably due to the difficulty in identifying the optimal target for DBS placement. Recent approaches compared the clinical response with a connectivity-based segmentation of the target area. However, studies are contradictory by indicating the connectivity to the primary motor cortex (M1) or to the premotor/supplementary motor cortex (SMA) to be therapeutically relevant. Objective: To identify the connectivity profile that corresponds to clinical effective targeting of DBS for ET. Methods: Patient-specific probabilistic diffusion tensor imaging was performed in 20 ET patients with bilateral thalamic DBS. Following monopolar review, the stimulation response was classified for the most effective contact in each hemisphere as complete vs. incomplete upper limb tremor suppression (40 assessments). Finally, the connectivity profiles of these contacts within the cortical and cerebellar tremor network were estimated and compared between groups. Results: The active contacts that led to complete (n = 25) vs. incomplete (n = 15) tremor suppression showed significantly higher connectivity to M1 (p < 0.001), somatosensory cortex (p = 0.008), anterior lobe of the cerebellum (p = 0.026) and SMA (p = 0.05); with Cohen’s (d) effect sizes of 0.53, 0.42, 0.25 and 0.10, respectively. The clinical benefits were achieved without requiring higher stimulation intensities or causing additional side effects. Conclusion: Clinical effectiveness of DBS for ET corresponded to a distributed connectivity profile, with the connection to the sensorimotor cortex being most relevant. Long-term follow-up in larger cohorts and replication in out-of-sample data are necessary to confirm the robustness of these findings.
format Article
id doaj-art-1f3f8547ddfc4eb6bdc20d0126891f72
institution OA Journals
issn 2213-1582
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series NeuroImage: Clinical
spelling doaj-art-1f3f8547ddfc4eb6bdc20d0126891f722025-08-20T02:06:20ZengElsevierNeuroImage: Clinical2213-15822025-01-014510370910.1016/j.nicl.2024.103709Strong connectivity to the sensorimotor cortex predicts clinical effectiveness of thalamic deep brain stimulation in essential tremorF. Grimm0M. Walcker1L. Milosevic2G. Naros3B. Bender4D. Weiss5A. Gharabaghi6Institute for Neuromodulation and Neurotechnology, University Hospital Tübingen (UKT), Faculty of Medicine, University Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, GermanyInstitute for Neuromodulation and Neurotechnology, University Hospital Tübingen (UKT), Faculty of Medicine, University Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, GermanyInstitute for Neuromodulation and Neurotechnology, University Hospital Tübingen (UKT), Faculty of Medicine, University Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, GermanyInstitute for Neuromodulation and Neurotechnology, University Hospital Tübingen (UKT), Faculty of Medicine, University Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, GermanyDepartment for Neuroradiology, University Hospital Tübingen (UKT), Faculty of Medicine, University Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, GermanyCenter for Neurology, Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases, and Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, GermanyInstitute for Neuromodulation and Neurotechnology, University Hospital Tübingen (UKT), Faculty of Medicine, University Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; Center for Bionic Intelligence Tübingen Stuttgart (BITS), 72076 Tübingen, Germany; German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), 72076 Tübingen, Germany; Corresponding author at: Institute for Neuromodulation and Neurotechnology, University Hospital Tübingen (UKT), Faculty of Medicine, University Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.Introduction: The outcome of thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) for essential tremor (ET) varies, probably due to the difficulty in identifying the optimal target for DBS placement. Recent approaches compared the clinical response with a connectivity-based segmentation of the target area. However, studies are contradictory by indicating the connectivity to the primary motor cortex (M1) or to the premotor/supplementary motor cortex (SMA) to be therapeutically relevant. Objective: To identify the connectivity profile that corresponds to clinical effective targeting of DBS for ET. Methods: Patient-specific probabilistic diffusion tensor imaging was performed in 20 ET patients with bilateral thalamic DBS. Following monopolar review, the stimulation response was classified for the most effective contact in each hemisphere as complete vs. incomplete upper limb tremor suppression (40 assessments). Finally, the connectivity profiles of these contacts within the cortical and cerebellar tremor network were estimated and compared between groups. Results: The active contacts that led to complete (n = 25) vs. incomplete (n = 15) tremor suppression showed significantly higher connectivity to M1 (p < 0.001), somatosensory cortex (p = 0.008), anterior lobe of the cerebellum (p = 0.026) and SMA (p = 0.05); with Cohen’s (d) effect sizes of 0.53, 0.42, 0.25 and 0.10, respectively. The clinical benefits were achieved without requiring higher stimulation intensities or causing additional side effects. Conclusion: Clinical effectiveness of DBS for ET corresponded to a distributed connectivity profile, with the connection to the sensorimotor cortex being most relevant. Long-term follow-up in larger cohorts and replication in out-of-sample data are necessary to confirm the robustness of these findings.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158224001505Essential tremorDeep brain stimulationThalamusProbabilistic diffusion tensor imaging
spellingShingle F. Grimm
M. Walcker
L. Milosevic
G. Naros
B. Bender
D. Weiss
A. Gharabaghi
Strong connectivity to the sensorimotor cortex predicts clinical effectiveness of thalamic deep brain stimulation in essential tremor
NeuroImage: Clinical
Essential tremor
Deep brain stimulation
Thalamus
Probabilistic diffusion tensor imaging
title Strong connectivity to the sensorimotor cortex predicts clinical effectiveness of thalamic deep brain stimulation in essential tremor
title_full Strong connectivity to the sensorimotor cortex predicts clinical effectiveness of thalamic deep brain stimulation in essential tremor
title_fullStr Strong connectivity to the sensorimotor cortex predicts clinical effectiveness of thalamic deep brain stimulation in essential tremor
title_full_unstemmed Strong connectivity to the sensorimotor cortex predicts clinical effectiveness of thalamic deep brain stimulation in essential tremor
title_short Strong connectivity to the sensorimotor cortex predicts clinical effectiveness of thalamic deep brain stimulation in essential tremor
title_sort strong connectivity to the sensorimotor cortex predicts clinical effectiveness of thalamic deep brain stimulation in essential tremor
topic Essential tremor
Deep brain stimulation
Thalamus
Probabilistic diffusion tensor imaging
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158224001505
work_keys_str_mv AT fgrimm strongconnectivitytothesensorimotorcortexpredictsclinicaleffectivenessofthalamicdeepbrainstimulationinessentialtremor
AT mwalcker strongconnectivitytothesensorimotorcortexpredictsclinicaleffectivenessofthalamicdeepbrainstimulationinessentialtremor
AT lmilosevic strongconnectivitytothesensorimotorcortexpredictsclinicaleffectivenessofthalamicdeepbrainstimulationinessentialtremor
AT gnaros strongconnectivitytothesensorimotorcortexpredictsclinicaleffectivenessofthalamicdeepbrainstimulationinessentialtremor
AT bbender strongconnectivitytothesensorimotorcortexpredictsclinicaleffectivenessofthalamicdeepbrainstimulationinessentialtremor
AT dweiss strongconnectivitytothesensorimotorcortexpredictsclinicaleffectivenessofthalamicdeepbrainstimulationinessentialtremor
AT agharabaghi strongconnectivitytothesensorimotorcortexpredictsclinicaleffectivenessofthalamicdeepbrainstimulationinessentialtremor