Various Statistical Methods in Use for Evaluating Human Malignant Gastric Specimens

This paper presents the use of certain statistical methods (comparison of means – independent samples t‐test, multiple linear regression analysis, multiple logistic regression analysis, analysis of clusters, etc.) included in the SPSS Statistical Package used to classify the patients quantitatively...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ventzeslav Enchev, Mircho Vukov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 1998-01-01
Series:Analytical Cellular Pathology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1998/149710
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850228323475521536
author Ventzeslav Enchev
Mircho Vukov
author_facet Ventzeslav Enchev
Mircho Vukov
author_sort Ventzeslav Enchev
collection DOAJ
description This paper presents the use of certain statistical methods (comparison of means – independent samples t‐test, multiple linear regression analysis, multiple logistic regression analysis, analysis of clusters, etc.) included in the SPSS Statistical Package used to classify the patients quantitatively evaluated after a subtotal resection of their stomachs. The group consisted of 40 patients subdivided into two groups: primary neoplasia of the stomach (20 patients), and corresponding lymphogenic deposits in the abdominal perigastric lymph nodes (20 patients). Paraffin‐embedded tissue sections (thickness 4–5µm) prepared as consecutive hematoxylin‐eosin‐stained slides were morphometrically measured by a rotation of a graduated eyepiece‐micrometer; thus, we obtained the minor and major axes’ lengths of the elliptic nuclear profiles and the minor and major caliper diameters of the corresponding cellular profiles. These four variables were used to determine the dynamic changes in quantitative features of human gastric lesions when passing from normal histological structures, through hyperplastic processes (chronic gastritis), gastric precancer (ulcers and polyps with or without malignancy) till the development of primary carcinomas and their corresponding lymphogeneous metastases. Besides the increased cytomorphometrical measures, we also noted an opportunity to classify the patients according to these data as well as to add to the knowledge of our consultation system for clinical aid and use, recently published in the literature.
format Article
id doaj-art-1f3e7193fcd14c19b1b90ee30148d87d
institution OA Journals
issn 0921-8912
1878-3651
language English
publishDate 1998-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Analytical Cellular Pathology
spelling doaj-art-1f3e7193fcd14c19b1b90ee30148d87d2025-08-20T02:04:34ZengWileyAnalytical Cellular Pathology0921-89121878-36511998-01-011629510010.1155/1998/149710Various Statistical Methods in Use for Evaluating Human Malignant Gastric SpecimensVentzeslav Enchev0Mircho Vukov1Department of Pathology, Third City Hospital, Sofia, BulgariaNational Centre of Health Informatics, Sofia, BulgariaThis paper presents the use of certain statistical methods (comparison of means – independent samples t‐test, multiple linear regression analysis, multiple logistic regression analysis, analysis of clusters, etc.) included in the SPSS Statistical Package used to classify the patients quantitatively evaluated after a subtotal resection of their stomachs. The group consisted of 40 patients subdivided into two groups: primary neoplasia of the stomach (20 patients), and corresponding lymphogenic deposits in the abdominal perigastric lymph nodes (20 patients). Paraffin‐embedded tissue sections (thickness 4–5µm) prepared as consecutive hematoxylin‐eosin‐stained slides were morphometrically measured by a rotation of a graduated eyepiece‐micrometer; thus, we obtained the minor and major axes’ lengths of the elliptic nuclear profiles and the minor and major caliper diameters of the corresponding cellular profiles. These four variables were used to determine the dynamic changes in quantitative features of human gastric lesions when passing from normal histological structures, through hyperplastic processes (chronic gastritis), gastric precancer (ulcers and polyps with or without malignancy) till the development of primary carcinomas and their corresponding lymphogeneous metastases. Besides the increased cytomorphometrical measures, we also noted an opportunity to classify the patients according to these data as well as to add to the knowledge of our consultation system for clinical aid and use, recently published in the literature.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1998/149710
spellingShingle Ventzeslav Enchev
Mircho Vukov
Various Statistical Methods in Use for Evaluating Human Malignant Gastric Specimens
Analytical Cellular Pathology
title Various Statistical Methods in Use for Evaluating Human Malignant Gastric Specimens
title_full Various Statistical Methods in Use for Evaluating Human Malignant Gastric Specimens
title_fullStr Various Statistical Methods in Use for Evaluating Human Malignant Gastric Specimens
title_full_unstemmed Various Statistical Methods in Use for Evaluating Human Malignant Gastric Specimens
title_short Various Statistical Methods in Use for Evaluating Human Malignant Gastric Specimens
title_sort various statistical methods in use for evaluating human malignant gastric specimens
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1998/149710
work_keys_str_mv AT ventzeslavenchev variousstatisticalmethodsinuseforevaluatinghumanmalignantgastricspecimens
AT mirchovukov variousstatisticalmethodsinuseforevaluatinghumanmalignantgastricspecimens