Comparative study of conventional and 3D printed denture base polymers: effect of low-pressure plasma as a surface treatment method

Objective: To compare flexure strength (FS) and surface roughness properties of conventional heat polymerized (CHP) and three-dimensionally printed (3DP) denture base resins and study the effect of plasma surface treatment on these properties. Material and Methods: Rectangular resin samples (65 × 1...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmed Abdulraheem Meki, Mohamed Khalaf, Hosam Muhammed Elsayed, Fayez El-Hossary, Mahmoud Ammar, Emad Boriqaa Abd Elsalam
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Estadual Paulista 2025-05-01
Series:Brazilian Dental Science
Online Access:https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/4568
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849229433423003648
author Ahmed Abdulraheem Meki
Mohamed Khalaf
Hosam Muhammed Elsayed
Fayez El-Hossary
Mahmoud Ammar
Emad Boriqaa Abd Elsalam
author_facet Ahmed Abdulraheem Meki
Mohamed Khalaf
Hosam Muhammed Elsayed
Fayez El-Hossary
Mahmoud Ammar
Emad Boriqaa Abd Elsalam
author_sort Ahmed Abdulraheem Meki
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To compare flexure strength (FS) and surface roughness properties of conventional heat polymerized (CHP) and three-dimensionally printed (3DP) denture base resins and study the effect of plasma surface treatment on these properties. Material and Methods: Rectangular resin samples (65 × 10 × 3.3 mm3) were fabricated from two material groups: CHP and 3DP resins (N=24/material group). Each group was divided into control and treated groups (n=12/subgroup) to study their flexural strength and surface roughness properties. A comparative evaluation of these properties was performed between the control groups at first. Afterwards, treated groups were exposed to low pressure atmospheric plasma treatment and were compared with control (untreated) samples regarding changes in their properties both before and after plasma treatment. Results: The surface properties of control CHP groups showed higher FS (p<0.0001) and lower surface roughness (p=0.0002) than the 3DP group. Generally, when compared to the control group of each material, the plasma-treated CHP group and the treated 3DP group showed significant increase in FS (p<0.0001). Surface roughness significantly increased in treated group of CHP (p<0.0001) but had no significant change in treated 3DP group (p=0.068). Conclusion: Conventional heat polymerized denture base resins possess superior flexural strength and lower surface roughness compared to 3D printed resins. Plasma surface treatment is an effective method to strengthen both CHP and 3DP denture base resins and roughen (micro-etch) CHP resin surfaces toward further chemical reactions. KEYWORDS Acrylic denture base; Plasma; Polymethyl methacrylate; Surface treatment; Three-dimensional printing.
format Article
id doaj-art-1f2e8d97b0914e768e7f1cf88c236ca9
institution Kabale University
issn 2178-6011
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher Universidade Estadual Paulista
record_format Article
series Brazilian Dental Science
spelling doaj-art-1f2e8d97b0914e768e7f1cf88c236ca92025-08-21T14:05:12ZengUniversidade Estadual PaulistaBrazilian Dental Science2178-60112025-05-0128110.4322/bds.2025.e4568Comparative study of conventional and 3D printed denture base polymers: effect of low-pressure plasma as a surface treatment methodAhmed Abdulraheem Meki0https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7430-0175Mohamed Khalaf1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0529-6720Hosam Muhammed Elsayed2https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5174-469XFayez El-Hossary3https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9289-0650Mahmoud Ammar4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4963-5854Emad Boriqaa Abd Elsalam5https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9007-2397Sphinx University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics. Assiut, Egypt.Sohag University, Faculty of Science, Physics Department. Sohag, Egypt.Al Azhar University (Assiut Branch), Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Dental Biomaterial Department. Assiut, Egypt.Sohag University, Faculty of Science, Physics Department. Sohag, Egypt.Al Azhar University (Assiut Branch), Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Department of Prosthodontics. Assiut, Egypt.Al Azhar University (Assiut Branch), Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Department of Prosthodontics. Assiut, Egypt. Objective: To compare flexure strength (FS) and surface roughness properties of conventional heat polymerized (CHP) and three-dimensionally printed (3DP) denture base resins and study the effect of plasma surface treatment on these properties. Material and Methods: Rectangular resin samples (65 × 10 × 3.3 mm3) were fabricated from two material groups: CHP and 3DP resins (N=24/material group). Each group was divided into control and treated groups (n=12/subgroup) to study their flexural strength and surface roughness properties. A comparative evaluation of these properties was performed between the control groups at first. Afterwards, treated groups were exposed to low pressure atmospheric plasma treatment and were compared with control (untreated) samples regarding changes in their properties both before and after plasma treatment. Results: The surface properties of control CHP groups showed higher FS (p<0.0001) and lower surface roughness (p=0.0002) than the 3DP group. Generally, when compared to the control group of each material, the plasma-treated CHP group and the treated 3DP group showed significant increase in FS (p<0.0001). Surface roughness significantly increased in treated group of CHP (p<0.0001) but had no significant change in treated 3DP group (p=0.068). Conclusion: Conventional heat polymerized denture base resins possess superior flexural strength and lower surface roughness compared to 3D printed resins. Plasma surface treatment is an effective method to strengthen both CHP and 3DP denture base resins and roughen (micro-etch) CHP resin surfaces toward further chemical reactions. KEYWORDS Acrylic denture base; Plasma; Polymethyl methacrylate; Surface treatment; Three-dimensional printing. https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/4568
spellingShingle Ahmed Abdulraheem Meki
Mohamed Khalaf
Hosam Muhammed Elsayed
Fayez El-Hossary
Mahmoud Ammar
Emad Boriqaa Abd Elsalam
Comparative study of conventional and 3D printed denture base polymers: effect of low-pressure plasma as a surface treatment method
Brazilian Dental Science
title Comparative study of conventional and 3D printed denture base polymers: effect of low-pressure plasma as a surface treatment method
title_full Comparative study of conventional and 3D printed denture base polymers: effect of low-pressure plasma as a surface treatment method
title_fullStr Comparative study of conventional and 3D printed denture base polymers: effect of low-pressure plasma as a surface treatment method
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of conventional and 3D printed denture base polymers: effect of low-pressure plasma as a surface treatment method
title_short Comparative study of conventional and 3D printed denture base polymers: effect of low-pressure plasma as a surface treatment method
title_sort comparative study of conventional and 3d printed denture base polymers effect of low pressure plasma as a surface treatment method
url https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/4568
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedabdulraheemmeki comparativestudyofconventionaland3dprinteddenturebasepolymerseffectoflowpressureplasmaasasurfacetreatmentmethod
AT mohamedkhalaf comparativestudyofconventionaland3dprinteddenturebasepolymerseffectoflowpressureplasmaasasurfacetreatmentmethod
AT hosammuhammedelsayed comparativestudyofconventionaland3dprinteddenturebasepolymerseffectoflowpressureplasmaasasurfacetreatmentmethod
AT fayezelhossary comparativestudyofconventionaland3dprinteddenturebasepolymerseffectoflowpressureplasmaasasurfacetreatmentmethod
AT mahmoudammar comparativestudyofconventionaland3dprinteddenturebasepolymerseffectoflowpressureplasmaasasurfacetreatmentmethod
AT emadboriqaaabdelsalam comparativestudyofconventionaland3dprinteddenturebasepolymerseffectoflowpressureplasmaasasurfacetreatmentmethod