Distinguish between feasibility and desirability when assessing climate response options
Abstract The current literature on assessing climate change response options does not sufficiently distinguish between assessing options in terms of their feasibility and in terms of their desirability. One example of this is the IPCC feasibility assessment framework. We argue that assessments of cl...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Lukas Tank, Lieske Voget-Kleschin, Matthias Garschagen, Miranda Boettcher, Nadine Mengis, Antonia Holland-Cunz, Gregor Rehder, Christian Baatz |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2025-04-01
|
| Series: | npj Climate Action |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-025-00237-2 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Reassessing the need for carbon dioxide removal: moral implications of alternative climate target pathways
by: Lieske Voget-Kleschin, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Governance of Carbon Dioxide Removal: Practitioners’ Perspectives on Fairness and Equity
by: Felix Dörpmund, et al. -
Even When Historical Texts Are Not an Option
by: Marion Wettstein, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Guaranteeing Desirable Futures: What Schools Offer to Prospective Students When in Mutual Competition
by: Westergren Jakob, et al.
Published: (2025-05-01) -
Ancient Desires
by: Charwei Tsai, et al.
Published: (2023-11-01)