Comparative efficacy of chemical peels and laser treatments in melasma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Melasma is a chronic pigmentation disorder that is difficult to treat due to its recurrent nature. This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of chemical peels and laser treatments in reducing pigmentation and associated risks like post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH). To compare chem...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ingyu Lee, SeoWon Kang, JinHan Lee, Hyungin Cho, Ki Won Lee, Dongkeun Lim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Society of Korean Cosmetic Surgery and medicine 2024-12-01
Series:Journal of Cosmetic Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jcosmetmed.org/journal/view.html?doi=10.25056/JCM.2024.8.2.81
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841558750115135488
author Ingyu Lee
SeoWon Kang
JinHan Lee
Hyungin Cho
Ki Won Lee
Dongkeun Lim
author_facet Ingyu Lee
SeoWon Kang
JinHan Lee
Hyungin Cho
Ki Won Lee
Dongkeun Lim
author_sort Ingyu Lee
collection DOAJ
description Melasma is a chronic pigmentation disorder that is difficult to treat due to its recurrent nature. This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of chemical peels and laser treatments in reducing pigmentation and associated risks like post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH). To compare chemical peels and laser treatments for melasma, focusing on their effectiveness in reducing pigmentation severity (Melasma Area and Severity Index) and assessing risks like PIH. We analyzed 15 randomized controlled trials comparing outcomes of chemical peels (e.g., glycolic acid, salicylic acid) and laser treatments (e.g., Q-switched Nd, fractional lasers). Outcomes included melasma severity reduction, PIH incidence, and patient satisfaction. Data were synthesized using standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and forest and funnel plots were used to evaluate efficacy and publication bias. Lasers showed higher efficacy in reducing melasma severity (SMD=0.82, 95% CI [0.60, 1.04], p<0.001) than chemical peels (SMD=0.65, 95% CI [0.45, 0.85], p=0.015). However, lasers had a higher risk of PIH, especially in darker skin types (Fitzpatrick IV-VI), while chemical peels were safer with fewer complications. Laser treatments effectively reduce melasma severity but increase PIH risk. Chemical peels, though slower, are safer for patients prone to adverse effects. Combination therapies and maintenance strategies may improve long-term outcomes in melasma
format Article
id doaj-art-1ea02dc210ff4bb9b1e4761131ee8ef0
institution Kabale University
issn 2586-0585
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Korean Society of Korean Cosmetic Surgery and medicine
record_format Article
series Journal of Cosmetic Medicine
spelling doaj-art-1ea02dc210ff4bb9b1e4761131ee8ef02025-01-06T05:22:11ZengKorean Society of Korean Cosmetic Surgery and medicineJournal of Cosmetic Medicine2586-05852024-12-0182818710.25056/JCM.2024.8.2.81JCM.2024.8.2.81Comparative efficacy of chemical peels and laser treatments in melasma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsIngyu Lee0SeoWon Kang1JinHan Lee2Hyungin Cho3Ki Won Lee4Dongkeun Lim5Department of Dermatology, Eco Samsung Orthopedic Clinic, Jeonju, Rep. of KoreaDepartment of Dermatology, Eco Samsung Orthopedic Clinic, Jeonju, Rep. of KoreaDepartment of Dermatology, Eco Samsung Orthopedic Clinic, Jeonju, Rep. of KoreaDepartment of Dermatology, Eco Samsung Orthopedic Clinic, Jeonju, Rep. of KoreaDepartment of Dermatology, Eco Samsung Orthopedic Clinic, Jeonju, Rep. of KoreaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Eulji University Medical Center, Seoul, Rep. of KoreaMelasma is a chronic pigmentation disorder that is difficult to treat due to its recurrent nature. This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of chemical peels and laser treatments in reducing pigmentation and associated risks like post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH). To compare chemical peels and laser treatments for melasma, focusing on their effectiveness in reducing pigmentation severity (Melasma Area and Severity Index) and assessing risks like PIH. We analyzed 15 randomized controlled trials comparing outcomes of chemical peels (e.g., glycolic acid, salicylic acid) and laser treatments (e.g., Q-switched Nd, fractional lasers). Outcomes included melasma severity reduction, PIH incidence, and patient satisfaction. Data were synthesized using standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and forest and funnel plots were used to evaluate efficacy and publication bias. Lasers showed higher efficacy in reducing melasma severity (SMD=0.82, 95% CI [0.60, 1.04], p<0.001) than chemical peels (SMD=0.65, 95% CI [0.45, 0.85], p=0.015). However, lasers had a higher risk of PIH, especially in darker skin types (Fitzpatrick IV-VI), while chemical peels were safer with fewer complications. Laser treatments effectively reduce melasma severity but increase PIH risk. Chemical peels, though slower, are safer for patients prone to adverse effects. Combination therapies and maintenance strategies may improve long-term outcomes in melasmahttp://www.jcosmetmed.org/journal/view.html?doi=10.25056/JCM.2024.8.2.81chemical peels; laser treatments; melasma; meta-analysis; post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation; randomized controlled trials
spellingShingle Ingyu Lee
SeoWon Kang
JinHan Lee
Hyungin Cho
Ki Won Lee
Dongkeun Lim
Comparative efficacy of chemical peels and laser treatments in melasma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Journal of Cosmetic Medicine
chemical peels; laser treatments; melasma; meta-analysis; post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation; randomized controlled trials
title Comparative efficacy of chemical peels and laser treatments in melasma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Comparative efficacy of chemical peels and laser treatments in melasma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy of chemical peels and laser treatments in melasma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy of chemical peels and laser treatments in melasma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Comparative efficacy of chemical peels and laser treatments in melasma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort comparative efficacy of chemical peels and laser treatments in melasma a meta analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic chemical peels; laser treatments; melasma; meta-analysis; post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation; randomized controlled trials
url http://www.jcosmetmed.org/journal/view.html?doi=10.25056/JCM.2024.8.2.81
work_keys_str_mv AT ingyulee comparativeefficacyofchemicalpeelsandlasertreatmentsinmelasmaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT seowonkang comparativeefficacyofchemicalpeelsandlasertreatmentsinmelasmaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT jinhanlee comparativeefficacyofchemicalpeelsandlasertreatmentsinmelasmaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT hyungincho comparativeefficacyofchemicalpeelsandlasertreatmentsinmelasmaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT kiwonlee comparativeefficacyofchemicalpeelsandlasertreatmentsinmelasmaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT dongkeunlim comparativeefficacyofchemicalpeelsandlasertreatmentsinmelasmaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials