Influence of geometrical parameters of dental implants on secondary stability and osseointegration process depending on the type of bone

Aim. Comparison of the secondary stability and osseointegration rate of dental implants with fine and coarse threads placed in bones of various types.Materials and Methods. The study considered the data of 60 implants with fine and coarse threads, installed in the bone types I-III. After two and six...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: R. V. Studenikin, A. V. Sushchenko, A. A. Mamedov
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: LLC "Endo Press" 2023-07-01
Series:Эндодонтия Today
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.endodont.ru/jour/article/view/1215
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849695604915044352
author R. V. Studenikin
A. V. Sushchenko
A. A. Mamedov
author_facet R. V. Studenikin
A. V. Sushchenko
A. A. Mamedov
author_sort R. V. Studenikin
collection DOAJ
description Aim. Comparison of the secondary stability and osseointegration rate of dental implants with fine and coarse threads placed in bones of various types.Materials and Methods. The study considered the data of 60 implants with fine and coarse threads, installed in the bone types I-III. After two and six months, an analysis of the loss of marginal bone, micromotion tests were carried out, changes in the stability coefficients were determined by the method of frequency magnetic resonance.Results. The 30 coarse threaded implants showed higher secondary stability compared to the finely threaded implants in all three bone types. Marginal bone loss was observed for both types of implants only in type III bone – but when comparing the absolute values, it is noticeable that they are smaller with large threads. Micromotion was absent in all cases for bone types I and II. For implants with large threads in type III bone, micromotion was less than 30 μm, and for implants with fine threads, it was 150-160 μm.Conclusions. High secondary stability is typical for implants installed in type I-II bone, regardless of the thread pitch, but the value of the stability coefficient is higher for specimens with coarse threads. In addition, there is no loss of marginal bone in these cases. Finely threaded implants placed in Type III bone are subject to micromovement.
format Article
id doaj-art-1e91c43739d54bf6a01a2020a36b2f6c
institution DOAJ
issn 1683-2981
1726-7242
language Russian
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher LLC "Endo Press"
record_format Article
series Эндодонтия Today
spelling doaj-art-1e91c43739d54bf6a01a2020a36b2f6c2025-08-20T03:19:43ZrusLLC "Endo Press"Эндодонтия Today1683-29811726-72422023-07-0121214815310.36377/1683-2981-2023-21-2-148-1531029Influence of geometrical parameters of dental implants on secondary stability and osseointegration process depending on the type of boneR. V. Studenikin0A. V. Sushchenko1A. A. Mamedov2Voronezh State Medical UniversityVoronezh State Medical UniversityChildren's State Clinical Hospital № 9Aim. Comparison of the secondary stability and osseointegration rate of dental implants with fine and coarse threads placed in bones of various types.Materials and Methods. The study considered the data of 60 implants with fine and coarse threads, installed in the bone types I-III. After two and six months, an analysis of the loss of marginal bone, micromotion tests were carried out, changes in the stability coefficients were determined by the method of frequency magnetic resonance.Results. The 30 coarse threaded implants showed higher secondary stability compared to the finely threaded implants in all three bone types. Marginal bone loss was observed for both types of implants only in type III bone – but when comparing the absolute values, it is noticeable that they are smaller with large threads. Micromotion was absent in all cases for bone types I and II. For implants with large threads in type III bone, micromotion was less than 30 μm, and for implants with fine threads, it was 150-160 μm.Conclusions. High secondary stability is typical for implants installed in type I-II bone, regardless of the thread pitch, but the value of the stability coefficient is higher for specimens with coarse threads. In addition, there is no loss of marginal bone in these cases. Finely threaded implants placed in Type III bone are subject to micromovement.https://www.endodont.ru/jour/article/view/1215stability coefficientsecondary stabilitymarginal bone lossimplant micromovement
spellingShingle R. V. Studenikin
A. V. Sushchenko
A. A. Mamedov
Influence of geometrical parameters of dental implants on secondary stability and osseointegration process depending on the type of bone
Эндодонтия Today
stability coefficient
secondary stability
marginal bone loss
implant micromovement
title Influence of geometrical parameters of dental implants on secondary stability and osseointegration process depending on the type of bone
title_full Influence of geometrical parameters of dental implants on secondary stability and osseointegration process depending on the type of bone
title_fullStr Influence of geometrical parameters of dental implants on secondary stability and osseointegration process depending on the type of bone
title_full_unstemmed Influence of geometrical parameters of dental implants on secondary stability and osseointegration process depending on the type of bone
title_short Influence of geometrical parameters of dental implants on secondary stability and osseointegration process depending on the type of bone
title_sort influence of geometrical parameters of dental implants on secondary stability and osseointegration process depending on the type of bone
topic stability coefficient
secondary stability
marginal bone loss
implant micromovement
url https://www.endodont.ru/jour/article/view/1215
work_keys_str_mv AT rvstudenikin influenceofgeometricalparametersofdentalimplantsonsecondarystabilityandosseointegrationprocessdependingonthetypeofbone
AT avsushchenko influenceofgeometricalparametersofdentalimplantsonsecondarystabilityandosseointegrationprocessdependingonthetypeofbone
AT aamamedov influenceofgeometricalparametersofdentalimplantsonsecondarystabilityandosseointegrationprocessdependingonthetypeofbone