The Three Laws of Artificial Intelligence: Re-Evaluating Human-AI Agency and Interaction in a Time of the Generative and Agentic AI Ren[ai]ssance
Isaac Asimov’s Three Laws of Robotics, a cornerstone of science fiction, provide a foundational but increasingly inadequate framework for governing modern artificial intelligence. This article critically re-examines these laws through the lens of contemporary AI paradigms—from generic tools to gene...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
2025-08-01
|
| Series: | Open Praxis |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://account.openpraxis.org/index.php/up-j-op/article/view/794 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849407277825523712 |
|---|---|
| author | Aras Bozkurt |
| author_facet | Aras Bozkurt |
| author_sort | Aras Bozkurt |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
Isaac Asimov’s Three Laws of Robotics, a cornerstone of science fiction, provide a foundational but increasingly inadequate framework for governing modern artificial intelligence. This article critically re-examines these laws through the lens of contemporary AI paradigms—from generic tools to generative creators and autonomous agents. It argues that the laws fail because their core concepts of “harm,” “obedience,” and “existence” are ill-equipped to address the systemic, non-physical, and adversarial nature of human-AI interaction. The First Law’s prohibition on harm is rendered obsolete by AI’s capacity for psychological and societal damage in a “post-truth” world. The Second Law’s mandate of obedience is inverted into a primary security vulnerability through “jailbreaking”. The Third Law’s self-preservation is reinterpreted as the need for “epistemic integrity”. The analysis posits that attributing moral agency to AI creates a “moral crumple zone,” obscuring human responsibility. The article concludes by rejecting the machine-centric model and proposing a new, human-centric Zeroth Law: An AI system must augment human intellect and preserve the integrity of human agency; its function and reasoning must remain transparent and ultimately subordinate to human values and oversight. This prime directive is not for the AI, but for its creators, designed to prevent a system from invisibly reshaping humanity and to stop humanity from thoughtlessly obeying the machine. In all, the article advocates for a shift from Asimov’s robot-centric rules to adaptive, human-centric governance frameworks that prioritize transparency, accountability, and the preservation of human agency within an “algorithmic panopticon.” This transition is essential for navigating the complex ethical landscape of human-machine symbiosis and ensuring technology augments, rather than erodes, human autonomy.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-1e8f834c8bc746109f01d4a1b32dd621 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1369-9997 2304-070X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-08-01 |
| publisher | International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Open Praxis |
| spelling | doaj-art-1e8f834c8bc746109f01d4a1b32dd6212025-08-20T03:36:07ZengInternational Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)Open Praxis1369-99972304-070X2025-08-0117310.55982/openpraxis.17.3.794The Three Laws of Artificial Intelligence: Re-Evaluating Human-AI Agency and Interaction in a Time of the Generative and Agentic AI Ren[ai]ssanceAras Bozkurt0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4520-642XAnadolu University, TR; Western Caspian University Isaac Asimov’s Three Laws of Robotics, a cornerstone of science fiction, provide a foundational but increasingly inadequate framework for governing modern artificial intelligence. This article critically re-examines these laws through the lens of contemporary AI paradigms—from generic tools to generative creators and autonomous agents. It argues that the laws fail because their core concepts of “harm,” “obedience,” and “existence” are ill-equipped to address the systemic, non-physical, and adversarial nature of human-AI interaction. The First Law’s prohibition on harm is rendered obsolete by AI’s capacity for psychological and societal damage in a “post-truth” world. The Second Law’s mandate of obedience is inverted into a primary security vulnerability through “jailbreaking”. The Third Law’s self-preservation is reinterpreted as the need for “epistemic integrity”. The analysis posits that attributing moral agency to AI creates a “moral crumple zone,” obscuring human responsibility. The article concludes by rejecting the machine-centric model and proposing a new, human-centric Zeroth Law: An AI system must augment human intellect and preserve the integrity of human agency; its function and reasoning must remain transparent and ultimately subordinate to human values and oversight. This prime directive is not for the AI, but for its creators, designed to prevent a system from invisibly reshaping humanity and to stop humanity from thoughtlessly obeying the machine. In all, the article advocates for a shift from Asimov’s robot-centric rules to adaptive, human-centric governance frameworks that prioritize transparency, accountability, and the preservation of human agency within an “algorithmic panopticon.” This transition is essential for navigating the complex ethical landscape of human-machine symbiosis and ensuring technology augments, rather than erodes, human autonomy. https://account.openpraxis.org/index.php/up-j-op/article/view/794Generative AIAgentic AIArtificial IntelligenceAI AgentsRobotsHuman-AI Interaction |
| spellingShingle | Aras Bozkurt The Three Laws of Artificial Intelligence: Re-Evaluating Human-AI Agency and Interaction in a Time of the Generative and Agentic AI Ren[ai]ssance Open Praxis Generative AI Agentic AI Artificial Intelligence AI Agents Robots Human-AI Interaction |
| title | The Three Laws of Artificial Intelligence: Re-Evaluating Human-AI Agency and Interaction in a Time of the Generative and Agentic AI Ren[ai]ssance |
| title_full | The Three Laws of Artificial Intelligence: Re-Evaluating Human-AI Agency and Interaction in a Time of the Generative and Agentic AI Ren[ai]ssance |
| title_fullStr | The Three Laws of Artificial Intelligence: Re-Evaluating Human-AI Agency and Interaction in a Time of the Generative and Agentic AI Ren[ai]ssance |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Three Laws of Artificial Intelligence: Re-Evaluating Human-AI Agency and Interaction in a Time of the Generative and Agentic AI Ren[ai]ssance |
| title_short | The Three Laws of Artificial Intelligence: Re-Evaluating Human-AI Agency and Interaction in a Time of the Generative and Agentic AI Ren[ai]ssance |
| title_sort | three laws of artificial intelligence re evaluating human ai agency and interaction in a time of the generative and agentic ai ren ai ssance |
| topic | Generative AI Agentic AI Artificial Intelligence AI Agents Robots Human-AI Interaction |
| url | https://account.openpraxis.org/index.php/up-j-op/article/view/794 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT arasbozkurt thethreelawsofartificialintelligencereevaluatinghumanaiagencyandinteractioninatimeofthegenerativeandagenticairenaissance AT arasbozkurt threelawsofartificialintelligencereevaluatinghumanaiagencyandinteractioninatimeofthegenerativeandagenticairenaissance |