Too close for cycling comfort? Social and physical contributors to subjective cycling safety in the context of overtaking: Results from a mixed-methods study combining data from OpenBikeSensors, the SimRa app, and qualitative interviews

Cycling is a central component of the mobility transition towards a sustainable mobility culture. While existing research on cycling largely focuses on transport infrastructure, the influence of subjective safety as a key factor in the decision to cycle remains understudied.This study contributes to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jennifer Bosen, Annika Herberg, Carmella Pfaffenbach, Carmen Leicht-Scholten
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-06-01
Series:Journal of Urban Mobility
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667091725000251
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849725532005990400
author Jennifer Bosen
Annika Herberg
Carmella Pfaffenbach
Carmen Leicht-Scholten
author_facet Jennifer Bosen
Annika Herberg
Carmella Pfaffenbach
Carmen Leicht-Scholten
author_sort Jennifer Bosen
collection DOAJ
description Cycling is a central component of the mobility transition towards a sustainable mobility culture. While existing research on cycling largely focuses on transport infrastructure, the influence of subjective safety as a key factor in the decision to cycle remains understudied.This study contributes to the growing body of research on subjective safety in cycling, presenting findings from an explorative, mixed-methods, inter- and transdisciplinary examination of subjective safety in the context of overtaking of cyclists in Aachen, Germany. Ten participants (gender-balanced, non-disabled, white, German, with a mix of ages, household sizes, and care responsibilities), were equipped with OpenBikeSensors (OBS) and the SimRa (German acronym for ‘safety in bicycle traffic’) app to measure overtaking distances and track incidents such as near misses. The individual OBS and SimRa data maps were then used as prompts in problem-centred qualitative interviews, which were analysed following qualitative content analysis and contextualised with the OBS and SimRa data.Results show that factors contributing to subjective cycling safety are highly individualised and multifaceted. Beyond physical vulnerability, subjective cycling safety includes factors of social vulnerability. The mitigation of factors contributing to subjective safety can be a route to cycling resilience and cycling agency. Planning for a cycling-friendly mobility culture requires addressing aspects related to transport equity and inclusion, particularly in relation to social vulnerability, in order to improve subjective cycling safety. Inter- and transdisciplinary collaborations, and mixed-method analyses, can generate scientific results to support and inform policy and practice, ultimately increasing the relevance of research results for sustainable transport planning.
format Article
id doaj-art-1e87450eeeeb49ada9392be949ee4255
institution DOAJ
issn 2667-0917
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Urban Mobility
spelling doaj-art-1e87450eeeeb49ada9392be949ee42552025-08-20T03:10:27ZengElsevierJournal of Urban Mobility2667-09172025-06-01710012310.1016/j.urbmob.2025.100123Too close for cycling comfort? Social and physical contributors to subjective cycling safety in the context of overtaking: Results from a mixed-methods study combining data from OpenBikeSensors, the SimRa app, and qualitative interviewsJennifer Bosen0Annika Herberg1Carmella Pfaffenbach2Carmen Leicht-Scholten3Corresponding author.; RWTH Aachen University, 52062 Aachen, GermanyRWTH Aachen University, 52062 Aachen, GermanyRWTH Aachen University, 52062 Aachen, GermanyRWTH Aachen University, 52062 Aachen, GermanyCycling is a central component of the mobility transition towards a sustainable mobility culture. While existing research on cycling largely focuses on transport infrastructure, the influence of subjective safety as a key factor in the decision to cycle remains understudied.This study contributes to the growing body of research on subjective safety in cycling, presenting findings from an explorative, mixed-methods, inter- and transdisciplinary examination of subjective safety in the context of overtaking of cyclists in Aachen, Germany. Ten participants (gender-balanced, non-disabled, white, German, with a mix of ages, household sizes, and care responsibilities), were equipped with OpenBikeSensors (OBS) and the SimRa (German acronym for ‘safety in bicycle traffic’) app to measure overtaking distances and track incidents such as near misses. The individual OBS and SimRa data maps were then used as prompts in problem-centred qualitative interviews, which were analysed following qualitative content analysis and contextualised with the OBS and SimRa data.Results show that factors contributing to subjective cycling safety are highly individualised and multifaceted. Beyond physical vulnerability, subjective cycling safety includes factors of social vulnerability. The mitigation of factors contributing to subjective safety can be a route to cycling resilience and cycling agency. Planning for a cycling-friendly mobility culture requires addressing aspects related to transport equity and inclusion, particularly in relation to social vulnerability, in order to improve subjective cycling safety. Inter- and transdisciplinary collaborations, and mixed-method analyses, can generate scientific results to support and inform policy and practice, ultimately increasing the relevance of research results for sustainable transport planning.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667091725000251Subjective safetyCyclingMixed-methodTransdisciplinaryVulnerabilitySustainability
spellingShingle Jennifer Bosen
Annika Herberg
Carmella Pfaffenbach
Carmen Leicht-Scholten
Too close for cycling comfort? Social and physical contributors to subjective cycling safety in the context of overtaking: Results from a mixed-methods study combining data from OpenBikeSensors, the SimRa app, and qualitative interviews
Journal of Urban Mobility
Subjective safety
Cycling
Mixed-method
Transdisciplinary
Vulnerability
Sustainability
title Too close for cycling comfort? Social and physical contributors to subjective cycling safety in the context of overtaking: Results from a mixed-methods study combining data from OpenBikeSensors, the SimRa app, and qualitative interviews
title_full Too close for cycling comfort? Social and physical contributors to subjective cycling safety in the context of overtaking: Results from a mixed-methods study combining data from OpenBikeSensors, the SimRa app, and qualitative interviews
title_fullStr Too close for cycling comfort? Social and physical contributors to subjective cycling safety in the context of overtaking: Results from a mixed-methods study combining data from OpenBikeSensors, the SimRa app, and qualitative interviews
title_full_unstemmed Too close for cycling comfort? Social and physical contributors to subjective cycling safety in the context of overtaking: Results from a mixed-methods study combining data from OpenBikeSensors, the SimRa app, and qualitative interviews
title_short Too close for cycling comfort? Social and physical contributors to subjective cycling safety in the context of overtaking: Results from a mixed-methods study combining data from OpenBikeSensors, the SimRa app, and qualitative interviews
title_sort too close for cycling comfort social and physical contributors to subjective cycling safety in the context of overtaking results from a mixed methods study combining data from openbikesensors the simra app and qualitative interviews
topic Subjective safety
Cycling
Mixed-method
Transdisciplinary
Vulnerability
Sustainability
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667091725000251
work_keys_str_mv AT jenniferbosen toocloseforcyclingcomfortsocialandphysicalcontributorstosubjectivecyclingsafetyinthecontextofovertakingresultsfromamixedmethodsstudycombiningdatafromopenbikesensorsthesimraappandqualitativeinterviews
AT annikaherberg toocloseforcyclingcomfortsocialandphysicalcontributorstosubjectivecyclingsafetyinthecontextofovertakingresultsfromamixedmethodsstudycombiningdatafromopenbikesensorsthesimraappandqualitativeinterviews
AT carmellapfaffenbach toocloseforcyclingcomfortsocialandphysicalcontributorstosubjectivecyclingsafetyinthecontextofovertakingresultsfromamixedmethodsstudycombiningdatafromopenbikesensorsthesimraappandqualitativeinterviews
AT carmenleichtscholten toocloseforcyclingcomfortsocialandphysicalcontributorstosubjectivecyclingsafetyinthecontextofovertakingresultsfromamixedmethodsstudycombiningdatafromopenbikesensorsthesimraappandqualitativeinterviews