The use of magnification in endodontic treatments by endodontists: results of a questionnaire

Abstract Background The aim of the study to investigate the accessibility and frequency of use of magnification systems in endodontics and to evaluate the economic and logistical factors. Methods A survey comprising of 34 questions, created in Survey Monkey, was sent to 874 clinicians. The survey co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gülsen Kiraz, Ayşe İbiloğlu, Arzu Kaya Mumcu, Safa Kurnaz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-02-01
Series:BMC Oral Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-05599-x
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850067846787235840
author Gülsen Kiraz
Ayşe İbiloğlu
Arzu Kaya Mumcu
Safa Kurnaz
author_facet Gülsen Kiraz
Ayşe İbiloğlu
Arzu Kaya Mumcu
Safa Kurnaz
author_sort Gülsen Kiraz
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The aim of the study to investigate the accessibility and frequency of use of magnification systems in endodontics and to evaluate the economic and logistical factors. Methods A survey comprising of 34 questions, created in Survey Monkey, was sent to 874 clinicians. The survey consisted of three main sections: demographic information, the use of magnification systems, and financial factors. Descriptive analysis and chi-square tests were performed. Results Of the participants, 42.3% were endodontists, and 57.7% were postgraduate students in endodontics. Nearly 26.1%, 32.7%, and 41.1% reported using a dental operating microscope (DOM), a loupe, and no magnification system, respectively. When asked how long it would take to recoup the cost of the DOM, considering additional charges or patient preferences, the most common response (40%) was 1–2 years. Conclusion Although the use of magnification systems has become quite widespread today, it is important to increase their use further. The procurement and use of DOMs have not created a long-term financial burden for clinicians.
format Article
id doaj-art-1e2b972d1ab94a609631f347d5e27db6
institution DOAJ
issn 1472-6831
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Oral Health
spelling doaj-art-1e2b972d1ab94a609631f347d5e27db62025-08-20T02:48:12ZengBMCBMC Oral Health1472-68312025-02-0125111210.1186/s12903-025-05599-xThe use of magnification in endodontic treatments by endodontists: results of a questionnaireGülsen Kiraz0Ayşe İbiloğlu1Arzu Kaya Mumcu2Safa Kurnaz3Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kutahya Health Sciences UniversityDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kutahya Health Sciences UniversityDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kutahya Health Sciences UniversityDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kutahya Health Sciences UniversityAbstract Background The aim of the study to investigate the accessibility and frequency of use of magnification systems in endodontics and to evaluate the economic and logistical factors. Methods A survey comprising of 34 questions, created in Survey Monkey, was sent to 874 clinicians. The survey consisted of three main sections: demographic information, the use of magnification systems, and financial factors. Descriptive analysis and chi-square tests were performed. Results Of the participants, 42.3% were endodontists, and 57.7% were postgraduate students in endodontics. Nearly 26.1%, 32.7%, and 41.1% reported using a dental operating microscope (DOM), a loupe, and no magnification system, respectively. When asked how long it would take to recoup the cost of the DOM, considering additional charges or patient preferences, the most common response (40%) was 1–2 years. Conclusion Although the use of magnification systems has become quite widespread today, it is important to increase their use further. The procurement and use of DOMs have not created a long-term financial burden for clinicians.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-05599-xDental operating microscope, endodontistLoupeMagnification systemsPostgraduate students
spellingShingle Gülsen Kiraz
Ayşe İbiloğlu
Arzu Kaya Mumcu
Safa Kurnaz
The use of magnification in endodontic treatments by endodontists: results of a questionnaire
BMC Oral Health
Dental operating microscope, endodontist
Loupe
Magnification systems
Postgraduate students
title The use of magnification in endodontic treatments by endodontists: results of a questionnaire
title_full The use of magnification in endodontic treatments by endodontists: results of a questionnaire
title_fullStr The use of magnification in endodontic treatments by endodontists: results of a questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed The use of magnification in endodontic treatments by endodontists: results of a questionnaire
title_short The use of magnification in endodontic treatments by endodontists: results of a questionnaire
title_sort use of magnification in endodontic treatments by endodontists results of a questionnaire
topic Dental operating microscope, endodontist
Loupe
Magnification systems
Postgraduate students
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-05599-x
work_keys_str_mv AT gulsenkiraz theuseofmagnificationinendodontictreatmentsbyendodontistsresultsofaquestionnaire
AT ayseibiloglu theuseofmagnificationinendodontictreatmentsbyendodontistsresultsofaquestionnaire
AT arzukayamumcu theuseofmagnificationinendodontictreatmentsbyendodontistsresultsofaquestionnaire
AT safakurnaz theuseofmagnificationinendodontictreatmentsbyendodontistsresultsofaquestionnaire
AT gulsenkiraz useofmagnificationinendodontictreatmentsbyendodontistsresultsofaquestionnaire
AT ayseibiloglu useofmagnificationinendodontictreatmentsbyendodontistsresultsofaquestionnaire
AT arzukayamumcu useofmagnificationinendodontictreatmentsbyendodontistsresultsofaquestionnaire
AT safakurnaz useofmagnificationinendodontictreatmentsbyendodontistsresultsofaquestionnaire