Carotid Artery Corrected Flow Time Measured by Wearable Doppler Ultrasound Detects Stroke Volume Change Measured by Transesophageal Echocardiography After Coronary Artery Bypass GraftingTake-Home Points

Background: As a measure of preload responsiveness (PR), change in carotid artery corrected flow time (ccFTΔ) is a surrogate for change in stroke volume (SVΔ). However, the optimal threshold and accuracy of ccFTΔ to detect SVΔ are inconsistent in previous reports. Research Question: Does ccFTΔ from...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jon-Emile S. Kenny, MD, Geoffrey Clarke, MEng, Sarah Atwi, PhD, Isabel Kerrebijn, MSc, Tracy Savery, MASc, Meredith Knott, BSN, Chelsea E. Munding, PhD, Mai Elfarnawany, PhD, Andrew M. Eibl, BComm, Joseph K. Eibl, PhD, Bhanu Nalla, MD, Rony Atoui, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-06-01
Series:CHEST Critical Care
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949788425000115
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: As a measure of preload responsiveness (PR), change in carotid artery corrected flow time (ccFTΔ) is a surrogate for change in stroke volume (SVΔ). However, the optimal threshold and accuracy of ccFTΔ to detect SVΔ are inconsistent in previous reports. Research Question: Does ccFTΔ from a wireless, wearable Doppler ultrasound accurately detect a 10% SVΔ measured by transesophageal echocardiography? Study Design and Methods: This was a prospective, single-center study of adult patients after elective coronary artery bypass grafting. PR was defined as ≥ 10% augmentation in transesophageal echocardiography left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral (as a surrogate for SVΔ) during Trendelenburg positioning. Synchronous carotid Doppler imaging was captured by a wireless, wearable Doppler ultrasound. The optimal ccFTΔ threshold to detect PR, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated. Linear correlation between ccFTΔ and SVΔ was assessed by Pearson correlation coefficient. We also evaluated the effect of the number of consecutively averaged cardiac cycles on ccFTΔ accuracy. Results: This analysis included 30 patients; 7 patients showed a ≥ 10% SVΔ during Trendelenburg positioning. The optimal ccFTΔ thresholds were +6.6 ms or 2.2% with sensitivities of 100%, specificities of 70%, and AUCs of 0.89 and 0.88, respectively. A strong, linear correlation between ccFTΔ and SVΔ was found (r = 0.70; P < .001). The mean AUC increased from 0.68 to 0.87 when using 1 vs 20 consecutively averaged cardiac cycles. Interpretation: After cardiopulmonary bypass, ccFTΔ measured by wireless, wearable ultrasound detected SVΔ during Trendelenburg positioning with high accuracy. The AUC improved as a function of consecutively averaged cardiac cycles. As a surrogate for preload-induced SVΔ, ccFTΔ can direct fluid therapy in the postoperative period.
ISSN:2949-7884